By on June 26, 2020

2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 1.5T SEL S-AWC Fast Facts

1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (152 hp @ 5,500 rpm, 184 lb-ft @ 2,000-3,500 rpm)

Continuously-variable automatic transmission with 8 “steps”, all-wheel drive

25 city / 26 highway / 25 combined (EPA Estimated Rating, MPG)

9.6 city, 8.9 highway, 9.3 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)

Base Price: $28,595 (U.S) / $36,298 (Canada)

As Tested: $32,125 (U.S.) / $38,598 (Canada)

Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $2,000 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Mitsubishi burned a lot of what little street cred it had left by taking the name of a once-beloved affordable sports coupe and plunking it onto yet another crossover.

The good news, if there is any, is that the crossover that now bears the nameplate is more than a little quirky.

The bad news – it’s not an affordable, fun-to-drive sports coupe.

Not to mention that the brand may soon be history, at least on these shores.

The least weird thing about the Eclipse Cross is that the driving experience is mostly unremarkable, especially in urban environs. It’s neither fast nor slow, but the 1.5-liter turbo four-cylinder has enough guts for undramatic commuting. The steering feels relatively connected to the road, with appropriate weighting, and the ride is about par for a vehicle in this class. The continuously-variable automatic, which has “steps” meant to mimic a conventional automatic, is relatively inoffensive, as CVTs go.

[Get a price quote for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross here!]

If it were safe to close your eyes while driving, you might think you were wheeling any old crossover. The driving experience is mostly normal, although the mode selector for all-wheel drive is a rarity.

It’s the rest that’s weird.

2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Let’s start with the styling. While not all that weird up front, it quickly gets quirky. The front view is pretty standard for a crossover – boxy and angular hood area with large fog lamp openings and a big lower fascia below the grille. Not quite attractive, but not ugly, either.

From the side, the view looks sloped and stanced, an appropriate attempt by the brand to give some sport to a crossover bearing a hallowed nameplate. Out back, though, it goes off the rails.

The rear haunches are unnecessarily bulbous, even accounting for the fact that the wheels are placed near the edges. The light bar bisects the rear glass, the taillights spike out, and a curving spoiler awkwardly frames it all.

Inside, the story isn’t much better. Fonts used in the gauge cluster and infotainment system are outdated, and the infotainment screen looks like a TomTom that got stuck to the dash. A Lexus-like touchpad sits aft and starboard of the gear shift, and there’s a reason only Lexus and Mitsu use these things. The buttons are laid out logically enough, but look weird – as if the design team thought they’d need to try extra hard to overcome Mitsubishi’s bad reputation of late. Material quality and build quality was better than what I’ve encountered on every Outlander I’ve ever driven, although the bar here is set low.

t.h./ttac

The entire experience just screams out that you either don’t know/care about cars and took the best deal you could find, or you have just enough money for a crossover in this class but not enough to drop a few grand more on something better.

Of course, Mitsubishi would argue that the Eclipse Cross offers value for the money, and the features list does bolster the brand’s case, even if Mitsubishi lists some features that are so mundane they’d might not make the sticker on other vehicles.

2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Standard items on my SEL test unit included fog lamps, LED lighting front and rear, paddle shifters, chrome grille accents, 18-inch wheels, heated front seats, leather seats, tilt/telescope steering wheel, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, satellite radio, Bluetooth, multiple USB ports, multiple-view camera, head-up display, keyless entry and starting, dual-zone climate control, blind-spot warning with lane-change assist, rear cross-traffic alert, automatic high beams, forward-collision mitigation with pedestrian detection, and lane-departure warning.

2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Options included a package that added a sunroof, premium audio, forward-collision mitigation with high-speed braking capability with pedestrian detection, adaptive cruise control, heated steering wheel, heated rear seats, auto-dimming rear-view mirror with HomeLink, and roof rails. A tonneau cover and carpeted floor mats rounded out the list.

So yeah, the features list is class-competitive. And the $32K sticker price isn’t terrible. There’s value here, perhaps. The Eclipse Cross at least has that going for it, which is nice.

Quirky, odd design is one thing – some people prefer that. And while the materials don’t feel class-competitive, necessarily, they’re still an improvement over what’s offered in other models in the lineup.

Yet, the Eclipse Cross just doesn’t quite feel good enough to justify a purchase to save dollars, unless one has no choice.

2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi had the chance to make something interesting here and got part of the way there. That’s no way to honor the Eclipse name.

But it is consistent with the band’s recent M.O.

There may be a time when Mitsubishi once again builds interesting cars at a value price. If that time doesn’t come soon, the brand won’t be in this market much longer.

[Images © 2020 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross SEL 1.5T S-AWC Review – In a Word: Weird...”


  • avatar
    Fred

    Kia and Hyundai sold a lot of cars in the early days, simply because of price. So did Yugo and others. Price is king. The big question of course is Mitsubishi going to be another Yugo or will they rise above the fray.

  • avatar
    B-BodyBuick84

    If one has the time, I’d suggest watching ‘the fast lane truck’ video of a 2018 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross VS a 2018 Jeep Compass. Despite being shod in street tread, it has an extremely commendable performance. To be frank, I don’t like the rear end styling of this car, and I generally shake my head at a CTV transmission that ‘acts’ like a conventional automatic as opposed to just designing and using an 8 speed automatic. BUT, it must be said that the S-AWC system Mitsubishi uses is excellent for snow and rough terrain, to the point that 95% of your average joe drivers would be satisfied or pleseantly surprised with. Underneath all that quirkiness is a very capable AWD system, which for here in Canada is a big selling point. Mitsubishi might pull back from N. America, but I doubt they will pull out.

  • avatar
    JMII

    Paddle shifters with a CVT transmission? Weirdness for sure. And yes the back end is a mess. As an ex-Eclipse GS-T owner (1996) the name alone makes me hate on this CUV.

  • avatar
    Menar Fromarz

    Is it too late to bring back their line from the early ‘90’s? I really liked those. Sigh.

  • avatar
    KOKing

    It has that top-heavy, small-tire look that 2000s non-Evo Lancers and original Tiburon had. And that rear looks like a bad attempt at 00s French design. Thankfully there don’t seem to be very many around, even on the roads of SoCal where people are more likely to remember Mitsu still sells cars.

  • avatar
    sgeffe

    From the front 3/4-view, the side apes a Chevy Trax pretty well. Whether that’s a compliment isn’t for me to judge.

  • avatar

    There are a lot of these in Japan, but imagine them with a lift kit that looks like a 5/8 version of something stolen from a Jeep.

  • avatar
    here4aSammich

    My local Mitsu dealer closed this year (not exactly sure when, but the sign is gone). I’ve only seen these as rentals on the Emerald Aisle. Pass.

  • avatar
    ajla

    I find this more compelling than the Altima AWD reviewed earlier this week.

  • avatar
    Flipper35

    The rear styling, the tacked on screen and “stepped” CVT are all individual deal breakers for me. I don’t get why you would use a stepped algorithm on a CVT. Just let it do its thing for economy like it is supposed to do. Otherwise drop a proper auto in and be done with it.

    No mention if it has engine noise piped in. That would be a complete list, though that isn’t as bad as the other three and could probably live with it.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • la834: > “the Bronco II’s main competition coming from General Motors via the S-10 Blazer and S-15 Jimmy....
  • ect: I acquired an ’87 Jeep Cherokee as a company car. It was head and shoulders above the Bronco II.
  • bd2: Kia could have done better if they had more inventory of models like the Telluride (which was vastly outsold by...
  • ect: Ditto, Tim. Reality is that, as I joke with my friends, it’s hard to tell what’s a weekday and...
  • Jeff S: Ok I meant timing chain but either is bad. I believe the design was to save space under the hood. I love the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber