U.S. to Play Beefier Role in Nissan's Future; Company Shakes Up North American Leadership

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A struggling Nissan sees the U.S. market playing a bigger role in the company’s sales future. Ahead of the release of its near-term recovery plan, expected later this month, the automaker sees new product as the key to firming up its flagging U.S. presence.

Elsewhere, a report out Friday claims Nissan’s new plan will see the U.S. account for a third of the automaker’s global volume. With all of this in the works, it’s perhaps no surprise that the company’s North American arm saw a sudden resignation.

Speaking to Reuters, sources with knowledge of the plan say the U.S. and China will each account of a third of the company’s volume (U.S. share rises from 25 percent today), with everywhere else — Europe, other Asian markets, Russia, and Latin America — seeing their share fall from 45 percent today to a third.

Word of this plan leaked earlier this year, as Nissan attempted to forge a path out of a global sales retraction and profit loss made all the more worse by the arrival of COVID-19. The company’s workforce and R&D spending will see a haircut, production volume will be cut going forward, and both Nissan and alliance partner Renault will focus on their strengths. Models that work in some markets will continue to be sold there, minus unnecessary, slower-selling stablemates.

In an interview with Automotive News, Nissan’s chief operating officer, Ashwani Gupta, called the U.S. a “great market” where the company will focus on three strategies: product, dealers, and “brand power.” The first of the three efforts is well underway, as seen by revamped models like the Altima, Versa, and Sentra. (The Rogue is next, followed by the Frontier and Armada.)

Greater standard content and fewer build configurations is now the name of the game, with focus placed on fewer fleet sales.

Gupta promised eight new products over the next 28 months, a move he says will reduce the average model age in Nissan’s lineup to 3.3 to 3.5 years. Despite overall sales figures deep-sixed by the coronavirus lockdown, Gupta added that Sentra’s retail share increased in April compared to the previous year.

“This product strategy, which is focused on new products with advanced technology, will bring the momentum in the U.S. market,” Gupta said. The COO then went out of his way to celebrate the brand’s dealer network, calling them “the face of our customer.” If you’ll recall, American dealers gave the company’s newly minted CEO an earful over the winter.

“If the product and dealers are great, they need to be connected by a transparent and sustainable business mechanism,” Gupta said. “In mid-February, we launched the Nissan Drive 2020 dealer support plan — a very comprehensive package designed to support the dealer.”

As for brand recognition, Nissan is well-known as a purveyor of value products — which doesn’t necessarily mean cheap. However, Nissan wants more brand power, preferring to be known as much for quality and accolades as its affordability. That power will come from new product, Gupta claims.

On Friday, Nissan announced the resignation of its North American president and chairman, José Luis Valls. His departure date is June 15th. Into the vice chairman role steps Jérémie Papin (seen above, on the left), who joined Nissan North America as its administration and finance chief in 2018 after serving as global finance director of the broader Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance.

Working beneath Papin will be Mike Colleran (same photo, on the right), current Nissan corporate vice president and global chairman of the Infiniti division. Colleran was appointed senior vice president for Nissan U.S. effective June 1st.

[Images: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on May 16, 2020

    Agree, many buyers don't even know how many cylinders are under the hood either. Nissan's problems are much greater than what type of structure their vehicle has. Nissan's quality really took a nosedive with their partnership with Renault.

  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on May 18, 2020

    So there's more suckers in the US and China? I believe it.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next