Status of PSA-FCA Merger Questioned, French Half Says Everything's Fine

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
status of psa fca merger questioned french half says everythings fine

Following reports from France that the merger between PSA Group and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles could be upended by the coronavirus, PSA announced that the media got this one all wrong. While the French automaker admitted that economic problems stemming from the outbreak are indeed concerning, it reiterated its commitment to safeguarding employment while adding that a merger makes even more sense now than before.

Still, there are valid reasons to question the current state of the merger agreement established in December via a memorandum of understanding. COVID-19 has sent global markets into a tailspin, with PSA and FCA seeing their share prices seesawing in the wrong direction over the last two weeks.

While the last few days has seen both companies regaining some of their lost value, neither are sitting pretty. Fiat Chrysler went from about $15 dollars per share in October, when the merger was announced, to roughly $7.50 today. Over the same period, PSA Group went from nearly $30 per share to just $13.72. Those in the know say this has not deterred negotiations; apparently, the businesses’ legal representation have continued seeking authorization from antitrust authorities so the merger can go through.

The Agence France-Presse news agency, however, reports that the financial impact of the pandemic will — at the very least — require the automakers to reassess the pact’s finer details, citing numerous insider sources asking to remain anonymous. Too much has changed over the past few months for there to be any alternative.

“Assumptions about valuation of the companies, revenues projections, sales for 2020 and beyond for both companies, all those mathematical assumptions that were made during the talks essentially have to be re-evaluated now,” explained Kelley Blue Book’s Karl Brauer.

From AFP:

The two groups planned a merger of equals, which involves paying a dividend of 1.1 billion euros to their respective shareholders for 2019.

FCA is also expected to pay an extraordinary dividend of 5.5 billion euros, while PSA must distribute to its shareholders its 46 percent stake in French equipment manufacturer Faurecia.

But Faurecia’s market capitalization has shrunk by at least a third since the merger was announced, which means the value of PSA’s stake lost nearly 1 billion euros as of Monday.

“We will have to rebalance things between shareholders if we still want to talk about a merger of equals,” said one of the financial sources.

And an industry expert, who asked not to be named, said, “I have always found that parity is very much to Fiat’s advantage.”

On Tuesday, French Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire warned all companies to exercise the maximum restraint possible on the payment of dividends. “It is a time when all the money has to be used to run businesses,” he said, adding that this would be doubly true of any businesses seeking government aid during the coronavirus pandemic.

“If PSA or FCA appeal to the state, how could they justify asking taxpayers for billions and distributing billions to their shareholders at the same time?” Gregori Volokhine of Meeschaert Financial Services told AFP.

For now, neither side is answering questions about how the merger might change. Considering how uncertain the next couple of months look, that’s not all that unreasonable, either. It’s doubtful the automakers are even in a position to effectively renegotiate. The industry could bounce back quickly after COVID-19 withdraws or stay in a prolonged state of decline if complications persist and factories take longer to resume operations. That’s a hell of a place to try and reopen the discussion.

FCA is silent on the matter, but PSA at least admits the status and schedule of the merger hasn’t changed. Expect that to be the narrative for at least the next few months.

[Image: PSA Group]

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 25 comments
  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Mar 27, 2020

    If we are truthful to ourselves, everyone has made -at least once- a big mistake in life which ended costing him/her dearly. When one finally realizes that things won't improve in the future, and it is better to cut your loses now to carry on with the rest of your life, one does indeed feel that a heavy weight has been lifted from your shoulders. That situation is called "experience". It is how we learn from our mistakes. Like the experience of having been a FIAT owner.

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Mar 27, 2020

      ... an experience that was all fun and no pain.

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Mar 27, 2020

    But to comment on the actual post content: Both FCA and PSA must be really, and I mean really desperate.

    • See 4 previous
    • -Nate -Nate on Mar 27, 2020

      @Scoutdude Just wait until you're older then remove your hearing aids and you'll sleep like a baby . I don't sleep much but I rarely hear her either.... I have incredibly bad gas and she hates it but also doesn't like it when I sleep elsewhere . -Nate

  • Jim Bonham Full EVs are not for everyone, they cannot meet all needs. Hybrids do a much better job of providing the benefits of EVs without most of the drawbacks. I have a hybrid sedan with plenty of room, plus all the bells and whistles. It has 360 hp, AWD, does 0-60 in just over 5 sec.(the instant torque is a real benefit), and I get 29 mpg, average. NOT driven lightly. I bought it used for $25k.Sure, it's a little heavier because of the battery, motor, etc., but not nearly as much as a full EV. The battery is smaller/lighter/cheaper and both the alternator and starter motor are eliminated since the motor assumes those functions. It's cool to watch the charge guage show I'm getting energy back when coasting and/or braking. It's even cooler to drive around part of the time on battery only. It really comes in handy in traffic since the engine turns off and you don't waste fuel idling. With the adaptive cruise control you just let the car slowly inch along by itself.I only wish it were a Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV). Then, I'd have A LOT more EV-only range, along with even more of that instant torque. The battery would be bigger, but still a fraction of the size of a full EV. I could easily go weeks without using much, if any gas (depending upon my commute) IF I plug it in every night. But I don't have to. The gas engine will charge the battery whenever it's needed.It's just not as efficient a way to do it.Electric companies offer special rates for both EVs and PHEVs which lower your operating cost compared to gasoline. They'll even give you a rebate to offset the cost of installing a home charger. You can still get federal (up to $7,500, plus some state) tax credits for PHEVs.What's not to like? My next daily driver will be a PHEV of some kind. Probably a performance-oriented one like the new Dodge Hornet or one of the German Hybrid SUVs. All the benefits, sound, feel, etc., of a gas vehicle along with some electric assist to improve fuel economy, performance, and drivability. None of the inherent EV issues of cost, range anxiety, long charging times, poor charger availability, grid capacity issues, etc. I think most people will eventually catch on to this and go PHEV instead of going full EV. Synthetic, carbon-neutral eFuels, hydrogen engines, and other things will also prevent full EVs from being 100% of the fleet, regardless of what the politicians say. PHEVs can be as "clean" (overall) as full EVs with the right fuels. They're also cheaper, and far more practical, for most people. They can do it all, EVs can't.
  • Ron rufo there is in WaSHINGTON STATE
  • ToolGuy @Chris, your photography rocks.
  • ToolGuy No War for Oli.If you have not ever held a piece of structural honeycomb (composite sandwich) in your own hands, try it.
  • ToolGuy You make them sound like criminals.
Next