QOTD: Alternative History of Avoiding Disastrous Consequences?


Last week we played a round of Armchair Alternative History where we discussed missed opportunities in the automotive industry. Conversation focused on actions automakers didn’t take when they should’ve.
Today is round two. Let’s go back and erase things that actually happened.
Some of you branched out into this topic last week in the 270-plus comments the article received. Today you’ll just have to pick a different past mistake to erase. No one covered your author’s selected misstep for this week.
This one had “AVOIDABLE” written on it in red paint.
1989: General Motors decides not to get involved with Saab
In 1989, Saab (cars) and Scania (trucks) were a single large company. The company restructured itself so the more profitable trucks were separated from the struggling automotive branch. The newly independent Saab Automobile AB needed some assistance, and it leaned on two new capitally-rich owners: Investor AB and General Motors, each with 50 percent ownership. Investor AB was (and is) a private equity firm controlled by the same family since 1916. Typically its investments are in large Swedish-based companies. Though it only has about 80 employees, the firm is worth over $30 billion. General Motors, a much different sort of company, spent $600 million, just like Investor AB. The investment came with an understanding that GM could purchase the remaining stake in the company within 10 years. It did so in 2000, at a cost of $125 million more (quite a discount).

It never should’ve happened. Though the new GM-based 900 was successful and caused the company to turn a profit, Saab was a story of continual struggle. With quirky ideas, unique engineering, and a small following, it was a bad match for the Costco management style of GM. By late in 2008 the brand’s future was in doubt among all of GM’s financial troubles. From there it was sold multiple times, split up, and finally rendered defunct in 2012. NEVS made some electric Saab 9-3s for a while, but those didn’t really count.
In my alternative history, the Saab brand goes to Investor AB and some other firm, probably in China. Eventually wholly Chinese-owned, Saab is just a name for cars that would normally be called Roewe or Great Wall. The company’s last real vehicles were the 900 and 9000, which lived until circa 2002 with minor revisions. Here, General Motors saves itself some money, and does not dilute the final chapter of Saab with things like the Trollblazer 9-7X, and the Saabaru 9-2X.
What’s your historical automotive misstep to erase?
[Images: Saab]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Carrera The diesels built during the last 10-15 years, if kept stock, don't really stink at all.
- MaintenanceCosts I keep finding myself drawn to the Fox PLCs, both the Thunderbird and the Mark VII. They really got the design right by 1980s standards. The cars were reasonably sized but didn't look dinky like the 1986 Eldorado, they were comfortable and drove pretty well, and they were available with a 302 (that even got non-asthmatic in the late years).When I bought my first car - a 1987 Taurus - I also thought about Aerobirds, but I decided (probably correctly, given the number of carpools I was part of) that I wanted four doors.
- SaraJumra Everyone can make money now a days very easily. I am a full time college student and just w0rking for 3 to 4 hrs a day. Everybody must try this home online job now by just useThis Following Website.-------->> dollar.onliejobs.workers.dev
- SaraJumra hwllo hy
- MaintenanceCosts Where's a gas inline six, for that torque and nice sound without all the diesel stink? Oh, that's right; GM being GM, they prematurely canceled it.
Comments
Join the conversation
Another from GM. What if Chevy had not gone the air cooled, rear engine route with the Corvair and had instead introduced a conventional front engine, rwd compact in the fall of 1959?
What if Chevy gave it a good rear suspension. It sells better, Detroit gets into the small car game earlier, Nader never writes "Unsafe at any Speed", remains unknown, and the Lions share of the 97,421 votes he got in Florida in 2000 likely go to Gore. Not injecting Politics...just pointing out that one had some serious ripple effects for years to come lol.