Duramax Deferral: Emissions Delay Punts Straight-six GM Diesel to 2020 Model Year

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors’ new Flint-built, light-duty 3.0-liter inline-six turbo-diesel won’t be a late-year addition to the company’s full-size pickup lineup, after all.

Apparently, the engine’s emissions certification process was not the speedy affair GM had hoped for. Customers will now have to wait for the 2020 model year before getting their hands on the 460 lb-ft oil burner.

The news comes by way of Automotive News, which got its hands on a memo sent to dealers Tuesday. As a result of a “slight delay” in the Environmental Protection Agency’s emissions certification process, dealers must now cancel and resubmit their orders, the memo said.

Production of diesel 2020 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 models should begin “soon,” the automaker said.

Since Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal in 2015, the EPA has taken a more rigorous approach to vetting diesel powerplants, leading to delays in certification. Fiat Chrysler’s EcoDiesel affair certainly didn’t help the EPA’s paranoia, either. The same situation is occurring overseas, where certain German product launches ran into unexpected delays as a result of the slower process.

With its new 3.0L Duramax, GM hopes to best a Detroit rival in light-duty diesel performance. Ford launched its 3.0L Power Stroke diesel for the 2018 model year and, while the Duramax powerplant bests it in terms of output (277 hp and 460 lb-ft, versus Ford’s 250 hp and 440 lb-ft), the GM engine’s fuel economy and towing figures remain unknown.

The automaker claims drivers will see 95 percent torque output at 1,250 rpm, with peak torque coming online at 1,500 rpm and staying until 3,000 rpm. Like the Ford, the only transmission available with the new GM diesel is a 10-speed automatic.

By adding an available diesel across multiple trims, GM hopes to boost the average transaction price of its new-generation pickups even further. Last quarter, the company said full-size ATPs were $8,040 higher than than of the old-gen pickup in the same quarter a year earlier. Helping the figure, of course, was the fact that full production of Silverado and Sierra regular and double cabs didn’t start until March.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on May 22, 2019

    I think the diesel is cool, but do they expect to sell many of these? I've seen exactly *one* F-150 with the 3.0l Power Stroke, and it was a King Ranch. I do see a fair number of RAM 1500 EcoDiesels, but still maybe less than five percent (heck, maybe one percent) of the RAM 1500s I see.

    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on May 22, 2019

      "Multiple Trim Levels" will help. Many of the other brands restrict the trim levels available with the diesel.

  • Oberkanone Oberkanone on May 22, 2019

    EPA is justifying the delay how? What is the amount of time required for certification? Fail on the part of EPA.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next