QOTD: Smart Idea, or No?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Monday brought news few people feared: the dwindling, one-model Smart brand (we refuse to use a lowercase “S”) is gonzo after 2019, at least in North America. Finally, some of you might be thinking.

It’s not likely there’s a large contingent of readers who can claim to be an owner of a Fortwo, or a Fortwo Electric Drive, or a Fortwo EQ Somethingorother, but it’s not inconceivable that a Smart played some part in your automotive history.

Given that the Smart brand lives on — and is destined to breed a new crop of global vehicles from its future Chinese plant come 2022 — it’s worth asking: can you see the brand returning to these unfriendly shores?

It won’t happen without eased trade tensions between the U.S. and China, and it certainly won’t happen if Daimler and joint venture partner Geely feel the new entity has something really hot. Something so scorching, so sure-fire, that it compels the partners to fund homologation, boat trips, showrooms, and branding.

Future Smarts will be electric, yes, but perhaps not as impractical as the brand’s current roster. And who knows what the future holds in terms of fuel prices and government intervention?

The original Fortwo was an oddity when it appeared. In that pre-recession era, the new, second-generation Fortwo offered a 36 mpg combined figure, a low price, and the ability to park anywhere. Despite the fact that a new, five-speed Corolla could seat five and return 31 mpg combined, five-figure volume occurred in more than one year. Up north, Canadians had access to the first-gen diesel model for a couple of years before the Americans, and that lunchbox-on-wheels’ 40 hp diesel triple returned 62 mpg on the highway.

Frugal.

Future Smarts might carry four passengers, not unlike the overseas-market Forfour, and they’ll certainly boast a driving range far in excess of the current EV model’s 58 miles. Looking three years into the future — when we’re all driving Ford Mach Es or what have you — can you see the Smart brand returning for round two?

[Image: Daimler AG]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 30, 2019

    Meh, I would rather ride bicycle.

  • Charliej Charliej on Apr 30, 2019

    There are quite a few Smarts down here in Mexico. They are very practical here in Mexico with the narrow streets in 500 year old villages. Even Nissan March's are a little to big. Watching someone try to wrestle a large pickup around the village is something to see. You may have to back up three times to get around the corner. So a Smart is a practical car for this area. Or you could do like me and leave the car at home and ride a motorcycle around the village. Cheap Mexican motorcycles start at less than a thousand dollars US. Even Hondas and Yamahas are about a thousand dollars here. Motorcycle heaven.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next