As Wall Street Awaits Earnings Report, Tesla Pumps Up the Range

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Later today, Tesla will release financial data for the first quarter of 2019, a quarter in which both deliveries and production fell compared to Q4 2019. The Model S and X returned their worst sales showings in years, and analysts fear a steep drop in revenue in a period where CEO Elon Musk pulled a U-turn on profitability predictions.

Should be fun.

However, there’s a more news coming out of Tesla than just anxious investors and head-scratching autonomy promises. There’s real, bonafide driving range added to the two aforementioned vehicles, and the company at least deserves kudos for improving its existing products.

As of Wednesday, a top-flight Tesla Model S Long Range offers a range of 370 miles, some 35 miles more than previous, while keeping the existing 100 kWh battery. The range-topping (so to speak) Model X Long Range can now travel up to 325 miles, or 30 extra miles compared to the previous model. As with the Model S, the Model X keeps its existing battery pack.

The bump in range is the product of several improvements, topmost of which is a motor upgrade. Both Long Range vehicles adopt a permanent magnet motor up front while keeping the induction motor in the rear; Tesla claims the new unit boasts silicon carbide power electronics, as well as improved lubrication, cooling, bearing, and gear designs. Efficiency is said to hit 93 percent. Aiding the models’ range mission are new wheel bearings and a new tire design, plus regenerative braking that returns more juice to the battery.

The existence of the Long Range monikers must mean something exists on the bottom end, right? Correct. Entry-level Model S and X models are back, carrying the Standard Range name. The Model S Standard Range is rated at an estimated 285 miles, while the Model X version is pegged at 250 miles. Starting price before incentives for the former is $79,200; the latter, $84,200.

While accessing extra range carries a premium over the base versions, you’ll have the added perk of faster charging. The automaker claims the Long Range models charge at a rate of 200 kW on its beefier V3 Supercharger and 145 kW on its more common V2 Supercharger. These rates represent a 50 percent boost in charging speed.

Both Model S and X Long Range models also see an updated version of Tesla’s air suspension, this one tailored to lower the vehicle as much as possible at highway speeds, thus reducing drag and eking out additional range.

News of the changes to the company’s higher-margin vehicle lines did nothing to elevate Tesla’s stock, which remains depressed following Monday’s open. Everyone’s waiting for new of another nature.

[Images: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Apr 25, 2019

    Just seen Tesla’s losses and it’s grim reading. Meanwhile sales of the Tesla model X and model S have been overtaken already in Europe by the Jaguar I Pace and the Audi E Tron. What’s remarkable about this is that the Audi isn’t actually available yet and Jaguar has come from nowhere in markets like the Netherlands and Norway to achieve this. Tesla owned these markets. The message is simple the competition is coming Tesla and your still loosing money!

  • EBFlex EBFlex on Apr 25, 2019

    Range is still pathetic compared to a proper gasoline powered vehicle. So worse range, way more expensive, and worse in the environment than a diesel vehicle. Why would anyone want a garbage electric car again? I guess the only upside is you will be able to drive father away from bumper that fell off in the rain. Good job Musk, you’re still a fraud

  • Oberkanone 1973 - 1979 F series instrument type display would be interesting. https://www.holley.com/products/gauges_and_gauge_accessories/gauge_sets/parts/FT73B?utm_term=&utm_campaign=Google+Shopping+-+Classic+Instruments+-+Non-Brand&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&hsa_acc=7848552874&hsa_cam=17860023743&hsa_grp=140304643838&hsa_ad=612697866608&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=pla-1885377986567&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwrIixBhBbEiwACEqDJVB75pIQvC2MPO6ZdubtnK7CULlmdlj4TjJaDljTCSi-g-lgRZm_FBoCrjEQAvD_BwE
  • TCowner Need to have 77-79 Lincoln Town Car sideways thermometer speedo!
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
Next