Junkyard Find: 1992 Jaguar XJ6 Vanden Plas Majestic

by Murilee Martin

Published: February 4th, 2019

junkyard find 1992 jaguar xj6 vanden plas majestic

Jaguar XJ40s are so plentiful in U-Wrench-It yards that I don’t even notice them as I wander around searching for the elusive Suzuki Equator (no luck there, yet). In fact, none of the Jags I’ve photographed prior to today’s Junkyard Find have been XJ40s, but we’ve got a one-of-121-built super-rarity here in Denver: a genuine Vanden Plas Majestic!

I must admit that I’d never heard of the Majestic before spotting this car, and my first thought that that I was looking at aftermarket badges sold by Manny, Moe, and/or Jack.

However, the MAJESTIC badging is everywhere in this car, so I realized I had a factory-built special edition car in front of me. The stretched wheelbase was a clue, too.

Determining the cause of junkyardization proved easy enough. It’s a shame for a car like this to end its career in some depressingly everyday crash with, I dunno, a Chrysler Cirrus.

The El Cheapo window-film job indicates that the final owner may not have been quite as wealthy as the car’s original purchaser.

The list price of the ’92 Majestic came to $59,500, or just over $108,000 in 2019 dollars. The 1992 Lexus LS400 went for $42,200, but didn’t have quite as swanky an interior.

The 4.0-liter straight-six made 223 horsepower, which resulted in leisurely acceleration for this two-tonner. Not that anyone bought this car for fast driving, of course.

This must have been one of the last American-market car ads to emphasize the ashtray.

If you like these junkyard posts, you can reach all 1600+ right here at the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand!

#1990s #1992 #1992JaguarXJ6 #BritishCar #BritishCars #Colorado #Denver #Depreciation #DownOnTheJunkyard #Jaguar #VandenPlas #Junkyard #JunkyardFind #LuxuryCar #LuxurySedans #LuxurySedan #JaguarXJ6

Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Hagerty and The Truth About Cars.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 46 comments

EGSE on Feb 04, 2019

A close-up of the pod to the right of the steering wheel would've been interesting to see what all those buttons are for. Murilee's junkyard series is one of my favorite reads on TTAC.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Jagboi on Feb 04, 2019
  
  Trip computer and cruise control. The switch on the vertical panel is for cruise on/off and resume. The buttons on the sloping panel are trip computer functions.
  
  Like
- Lie2me on Feb 04, 2019
  
  @Jagboi Bet none of them worked
  
  Like
- Jagboi on Feb 04, 2019
  
  @Lie2me Cruise was made by Hella, it seemed pretty durable.
  
  Like
Superdessucke on Feb 05, 2019

That half shaft holding up the hood of the Majestic is so undignified!

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Mitchell Leitman Matt, Canada is getting the EV5 as well. Looks like Kia likes Canada
Jkross22 "It’s that manufacturers have undermined the very concept of ownership by building de facto backdoors into connected products that now make up a majority of what’s on the market."Matt, you buried the lead. It's not just a privacy problem. Per Rossmann.... if you buy a product that relies on an internet connection to work, do you really own it or are you just making monthly installments in perpetuity until the product has a catastrophic failure and you have to buy a new one?Speaking of catastrophically failing products, Samsung is pushing ads to their refrigerators with screens.... The fridges that are $3.5k+. Nothing Phone is experimenting with sending ads to the people that bought their cell phones and making the ad the home screen. Google is cutting connected support for their Gen 1/2 thermostats so that they will no longer be accessible remotely. The appetite of companies to invade our privacy and to monetize us instead of innovating is endless. I know I'm not alone when I say the best car is one without a screen. If you can't avoid that, try to get one with a 3g radio. Good luck hacking those.
28-Cars-Later “1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries....It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences”― Theodore J. Kaczynski, Ph.D., Industrial Society and Its Future, 1995.
FreedMike "Automotive connectivity has clearly been a net negative for the end user..."Really? Here's a list of all the net negatives for me:1) Instead of lugging around a road atlas or smaller maps that do nothing but distract me from driving, and don't tell me where to go once I've reached Point B, I can now just ask my car's navigation system to navigate me there. It'll even tell me how long it will take given current traffic conditions. 2) Instead of lugging around a box of a dozen or so cassette tapes that do nothing but distract me from driving, I can now just punch up a virtually endless library of music, podcasts, or audiobooks on the screen, push a button, and play them. 3) I can tell my car, "call (insert name here)" and the call is made without taking my hands off the wheel.4) I can tell my car, "text (insert name here)" and the system takes my dictation, sends me the text, and reads off any replies. 5) I can order up food on my screen, show up at the restaurant, and they'll have it waiting for me. 6) I can pull up a weather map that allows me to see things like hailstorms in my path. 7) If I'm in trouble, I can push a "SOS" button and help will be sent. 8) Using my phone, I can locate my car on a map and navigate to it on foot, and tell it to turn on the heat, A/C, or defrosters.None of these are benefits? Sorry, not sorry...I like them all. Why wouldn't I? Consumers clearly also like this stuff, and if they didn't, none of it would be included in cars. Now, maybe Matt doesn't find these to be beneficial. Fair enough! But he should not declare these things as a "net negative" for the rest of us. That's presumption. So...given all that, what's the answer here? Matt seems to think the answer is to "unplug" and go back to paper maps, boxes of music, and all that. Again, if that's Matt's bag, then fair enough. I mean, I've been there, and honestly, I don't want to go back, but if that's his bag, then go with God, I guess. But this isn't the solution for everyone, and saying otherwise is presumption. Here's a solution that DOES work for everyone: instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, clean the bathwater. You do that very, very simply: require clear, easy-to-understand disclosure of data sharing that happens as the result of all these connected services, and an equally clear, easy-to-understand method for opting out of said data sharing. That works better than turning the clock back to those thrilling days of 1990 when you had to refer to handwritten notes to get you to your date's house, or ripping SIM cards out of your car.
Funky D What is the over-under for number of recalls in the first 5 years of ownership?