Let Mobility Die: Hyundai Showcases Dumb, Spider-legged Thing for CES 2019

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Hyundai kicked off the New Year by teasing a concept vehicle it claims can tackle just about any terrain in a manner befitting Inspector Gadget. That’s because it’s time for the 2019 Consumer Electronics Show (CES), which is the premiere event for showcasing half-baked and incomplete technological marvels in a desperate effort to titillate investors and tech fetishists.

For Hyundai, that meant rolling out computer-generated images of Project Elevate and its Ultimate Mobility Vehicle (UMV) after a few days of gentle teasing. Normally, I wouldn’t touch a topic like this if I wasn’t planning on making fun of it — which is what I intend to do here. But before getting too deep into the ridicule, there’s an important takeaway to be made: This lack of vision might herald the final days of mobility-based marketing.

Stay with me here. Roughly a decade ago, everyone and their mother became obsessed with tech and automakers began talking endlessly about autonomous cars while parading tiny, single-occupant vehicles to dazzle people in their absence. Hyundai released an unintentionally hysterical mobility pod, called the E4U, at the 2013 Seoul Motor Show. It also dabbled in automotive flight and drone technology, but knew enough to tap both as part of its April Fool’s Day goof for 2017.

Project Elevate is being treated much more seriously, though. Hyundai Motor Group, which has done an exceptional job improving its automotive product over the last fifteen years, clearly needed to deliver something to this year’s Consumer Electronics Show. Presumably, Hyundai’s CES marketing team understood that flying cars have been done to death over the last couple of years and knew they needed to take a different approach. Several episodes of Wacky Races later, they had their idea — a car with an extendible suspension that can drive over any obstacle. True brilliance.

Frankly, we’re shocked Hyundai didn’t just run with putting up fake exit signs and matte paintings of the horizon, as it’s slightly more realistic than Project Elevate. Still, the UMV isn’t for winning illegal derbies. It’s supposed to be a search-and-rescue vehicle capable of handling any terrain — sort of like a helicopter, but worse.

“When a tsunami or earthquake hits, current rescue vehicles can only deliver first responders to the edge of the debris field. They have to go the rest of the way by foot. Elevate can drive to the scene and climb right over flood debris or crumbled concrete,” explained John Suh, VP and founding director of Hyundai’s CRADLE. “This technology goes well beyond emergency situations — people living with disabilities worldwide that don’t have access to an ADA ramp could hail an autonomous Hyundai Elevate that could walk up to their front door, level itself, and allow their wheelchair to roll right in — the possibilities are limitless.”

Supposedly, the UMV can tackle walls up to 5 feet in height and traverse gaps of a similar length to reach troubled areas. Once it’s there, the legs adopt a movement style (animal or reptilian) that’s best suited for the terrain. After securing its payload and exfiltrating the area, the vehicle then hunkers down for some energy efficient street cruising.

Based on a proprietary modular EV platform, which can be customized in a similar manner as General Motors’ Silent Utility Rover Universal Superstructure (SURUS) platform, Hyundai’s UMV uses wheel hub propulsion motors and a purely electric powertrain. It’s also completely hypothetical. Despite claiming it’s worked on this project for several years, everything the automaker showed is conceptual. It’s almost like they ran out of ideas for the now obligatory mobility angle that’s omnipresent at CES and had to check the waste basket at CRADLE (Hyundai’s Center for Robotic-Augmented Design in Living Experiences).

So long as automakers keep rolling out harebrained schemes, we’re going to continue rolling our eyes. Of course, we seem to be one of the few outlets that’s willing to anymore, as much of the media seems to think it’s a great idea. And it was a great idea when NASA incorporated it into the pint-sized Mars rover and George Lucas needed something to threaten rebel bases. But you’re living in a fantasyland if you think Hyundai will turn Project Elevate into a full-scale, commercial product. Hyundai doesn’t feel like the right company for the job and the logistics would be nearly insurmountable even with some hearty government funding.

Mobility projects are always worth exploring, but they aren’t always worth advertising. Obviously, Hyundai has no serious intention of bringing this idea to fruition. It’s just another mobility concept from an automaker that’s playing pretend at the Consumer Electronics Show, and it’s my deepest hope that I’m not the only person who sees this (and believes the industry is finally running out of dumb mobility ideas).

[Images: Hyundai Motor Company]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 17 comments
  • Craiger Craiger on Jan 08, 2019

    We've all seen the videos of the experimental robot pack mules. This is just a larger version of that. The technology is available. I could see the Army looking at it for mobility across rough terrain. That being said, the vehicle would probably burn so much fuel that it couldn't travel far enough to be feasible.

    • See 1 previous
    • PeriSoft PeriSoft on Jan 09, 2019

      "It’ll be a BEV. And have a range of 0.5 miles." In fairness, it's not going to use all that much power, really. The 'leg' axes would be heavily geared and not be at full power most of the time; slowly lifting weight doesn't actually take a ton of juice. If you wanted this thing to go 50mph over broken terrain it would be massive amounts of power; 5mph and it could probably run for hours and hours - so for the stated use case it's probably fine. Nothing you actually designed to do this job would *look* anything like this, but power usage probably isn't the dealbreaker.

  • Jfk-usaf Jfk-usaf on Jan 09, 2019

    You could have just left it at "Let Mobility Die"... this thing brought to you by the company that wants to build a new luxury brand and just released a couple of nice new high end cars ..... to a market focused (scratch focused) dominated by SUV/CUVs ... "Go Go Gadget A** Hat!"

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next