Renault Keeps Ghosn as Chairman and CEO As Probe Reveals No Wrongdoing

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Two automakers, two investigations, and two very different outcomes for one man.

Renault’s board of directors met in France today, deciding that CEO and chairman Carlos Ghosn should stay on in his current role in the wake of an internal investigation that members say showed no signs of criminality. Meanwhile, Ghosn sits in a Tokyo jail, indicted on charges of financial misconduct at Renault’s alliance partner, Nissan.

Away from the Paris streets, it seems everything’s hunky dory in France.

While the Renault probe turned up no illegality in regards to Ghosn’s finances on the French side of alliance, Nissan’s internal investigation turned up enough evidence to prompt the former Nissan chairman’s arrest. The Japanese automaker’s board voted to drop Ghosn after that country’s authorities nabbed Ghosn in Tokyo on Nov. 19.

In a media release, Renault stated:

As part of the agenda, Claude Baland, Senior Advisor in charge of Ethics and Compliance, and Eric Le Grand Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, presented to the Board of Directors of Groupe Renault the current status of the review concerning the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Renault for the years 2015-2018 which was undertaken on November 23, 2018. Their preliminary conclusion is that the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Renault and the conditions under which such compensation was approved were in compliance with applicable law as well as the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF.

Japan, as well as Nissan, accuses Ghosn and board member John Kelly (since dropped from its ranks) of under-reporting Ghosn’s income by nearly $80 million between 2010 and 2017. The Japanese indictment, handed down earlier this week, pertains to the 2010-2014 period. Ghosn denies he hid income in statements to Japan’s finance ministry; rather, through his lawyer he claims the compensation was deferred income, to be paid out after his departure. It wasn’t necessary to reveal this income at the time, he claims, though Japan will have the last word on that.

Just yesterday, it was revealed that Nisan received approval to hand over the results of its investigation to Renault. The board has still not had an opportunity to question Ghosn.

“We believe we need to wait on what Carlos Ghosn has to say about this one-sided investigation,” a person familiar with the board meeting told the Wall Street Journal.

In its statement, Renault said, “The Board of Directors requested that Renault’s lawyers continue their review and assessment of the information provided, in liaison with Nissan’s lawyers, and promptly provide the Board with a new update on the situation.”

In addition to reviewing the Nissan dossier, Renault will continue probing financial reports going further back in time. For now, the relationship between the two intertwined automakers remains strained.

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Ravenchris Ravenchris on Dec 13, 2018

    I hope Mr. Ghosn beats the rap.

  • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on Dec 17, 2018

    Ghosn is guilty, he knew he was hiding his pay. Nissan is guilty, they turned a blind eye because he was successful. Now Renault's about to seize control of the whole corporate structure and this is a desperate gambit by Nissan to remain independent. The Japanese government has a dog in the fight because if Ghosn goes free it legitimizes corporate sovereignty over national sovereignty. As much as I like what Ghosn did for Nissan, he needs to face the music for violating Japanese law, if that part is proven. The Nissan board also needs to face jail time for their complicity. Renault needs to go ahead and absorb Nissan and Mitsubishi. France and Japan need to defend their sovereignty through regulation and rule of law, even if the companies stocks go down for a bit.

  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
  • Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
Next