A New Alliance? Volkswagen and Ford In Talks to Share U.S. Plants
Months of speculation fueled by the increasingly chummy relationship between Ford and Volkswagen has given way to new possibilities. The two partners, who signed a Memorandum of Understanding earlier this year, might leap further into bed than initially thought.
To hear VW CEO Herbert Diess tell it, the two automakers might soon share American assembly space. And can Tennessee expect a new plant? It’s on the table.
Diess was in Washington D.C. this week for a White House meeting. Stopping to speak with assembled media, Diess claimed the German company was (quite eagerly, it seems) building an alliance with its American partner.
“We are in quite advanced negotiations and dialog with Ford Corporation to really build up a global automotive alliance, which also would strengthen the American automotive industry,” Diess told Reuters, adding that his company was considering building a second assembly plant in the United States.
An alliance could result in VW building cars in underutilized Ford factories, he said.
“We are building an alliance with Ford which will strengthen Ford’s position in Europe because we will share platforms,” Diess commented. “We might use Ford capacity here in the U.S. to build cars for us.”
Unlike the Renault-Nissan Alliance, this one wouldn’t see VW take a stake in the other company. Rather, it would be all about product and capacity.
When reporters in Detroit questioned Bill Ford Jr. about Diess’ remarks, the Ford chairman replied that talks with VW were going “very well,” though he remained much more tight-lipped than his German counterpart. Asked about the possibility of joint products or shared production space, Ford said the two “haven’t gotten that granular in our talks yet.”
Earlier remarks by VW execs and company sources suggested the main goal for the two companies was the production of light commercial vehicles in Europe. That eventually migrated to the possibility of jointly developed models, or perhaps platform swaps, in other segments. VW is apparently quite interested in Ford’s midsize Ranger pickup, while the company’s MEB electric platform could prove quite useful to Ford.
As for a second VW plant, Diess said the company is in “quite advanced negotiations in Tennessee but there might be other options as well.” Currently, the automaker’s Chattanooga assembly plant isn’t running at capacity, though new products are likely on the way. They include a shorter, sportier version of the Atlas, an Atlas-based pickup, and MEB-platform I.D. models.
If you’re thinking all of this talk of boosted U.S. VW production, accomplished in whatever way possible, is a good way to insulate VW from possible tariffs on European vehicles, well, you’re not alone.
“That’s basically why we are here, to avoid the additional tariffs, and I think we’re in a good way,” Diess told Bloomberg outside the White House.
[Image: Ford Motor Company]
Geozinger on Dec 06, 2018
I'm scratching my head on this one. For years, we've been told there is overcapacity in the US. GM's recent announcement reinforces this idea. I don't recall Ford closing as many plants in the last 8-10 years as GM, but they didn't have as many to start with. VW has a middling market share in the US, I think the Golf/Jetta is the only car that really generates good sales numbers. Are the Atlas and Tiguan really that much in demand? I have a hard time seeing where VW needs the capacity (unless it's strictly for the proposed van production). VW is essentially outsourcing it's new product here in the US, which is kind of odd. Considering they have huge investments in Mexico, I would imagine it would be cheaper to produce there.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Jeff S Corey--We know but we still want to give our support to you and let TTAC know that your articles are excellent and better than what the typical articles are.
- Jeff S A sport utility vehicle or SUV is a car classification that combines elements of road-going passenger cars with features from off-road vehicles, such as raised ground clearance and four-wheel drive.There is no commonly agreed-upon definition of an SUV and usage of the term varies between countries. Thus, it is "a loose term that traditionally covers a broad range of vehicles with four-wheel drive." Some definitions claim that an SUV must be built on a light truck chassis; however, broader definitions consider any vehicle with off-road design features to be an SUV. A [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover_(automobile)]crossover SUV[/url] is often defined as an SUV built with a unibody construction (as with passenger cars), however, the designations are increasingly blurred because of the capabilities of the vehicles, the labelling by marketers, and electrification of new models.The predecessors to SUVs date back to military and low-volume models from the late 1930s, and the four-wheel drive station wagons and carryalls that began to be introduced in 1949. The 1984 [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_Cherokee_(XJ)]Jeep Cherokee (XJ)[/url] is considered to be the first SUV in the modern style. Some SUVs produced today use unibody construction; however, in the past, more SUVs used body-on-frame construction. During the late 1990s and early 2000s, the popularity of SUVs greatly increased, often at the expense of the popularity of large [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_(automobile)]sedans[/url] and station wagons.More recently, smaller SUVs, mid-size, and crossovers have become increasingly popular. SUVs are currently the world's largest automotive segment and accounted for 45.9% of the world's passenger car market in 2021. SUVs have been criticized for a variety of environmental and safety-related reasons. They generally have poorer fuel efficiency and require more resources to manufacture than smaller vehicles, contributing more to climate change and environmental degradation. Between 2010 and 2018 SUVs were the second largest contributor to the global increase in carbon emissions worldwide. Their higher center of gravity increases their risk of rollovers. Their larger mass increases their stopping distance, reduces visibility, and increases damage to other road users in collisions. Their higher front-end profile makes them at least twice as likely to kill pedestrians they hit. Additionally, the psychological sense of security they provide influences drivers to drive less cautiously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_utility_vehicleWith the above definition of SUV any vehicle that is not a pickup truck if it is enclosed, doesn't have a trunk, and is jacked up with bigger tires. If the green activists adhere to this definition of what an SUV is there will be millions of vehicles with flat tires which include HRVs, Rav4s, CRVs, Ford Escapes, Buick Encores, and many of compact and subcompact vehicles. The green movement is going to have to recruit millions of new followers and will be busy flattening millions of tires in the US and across the globe. Might be easier to protest.
- Sckid213 I actually do agree that most Nissans are ultimately junk. (I also think many BMWs are also). I was talking challenging the 3 in terms of driving dynamics. Agree all were failures in sales.
- THX1136 More accurately said, we are seeing exponential growth in the manufacturing capabilities in this market. Unless, of course, all those vehicles are sold with customers waiting until more a produced so they can buy. Indeed, there are certainly more EVs being purchased now than back in 2016. Is demand outstripping manufacturing? Maybe or maybe not. I sincerely don't know which is why I ask.
- ToolGuy The page here (linked in the writeup) is ridiculously stupid https://www.tyreextinguishers.com/how-to-spot-an-suvLike, seriously stupid, e.g., A) Not sure that particular Volvo is killing the planet as quickly as some other vehicles we might choose. B) A Juke is "huge"??? C) The last picture shows a RAV4 Hybrid?