Volkswagen Might Put Audi on the Back Burner, Spend More Time With Ford: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

According to sources who spoke to Reuters, Volkswagen Group has more interest in pursuing technological relationships with new partners, especially Ford, than continuing on with Audi as its main development hub. At least for a while.

VW CEO Herbert Diess will reportedly unveil a 10-year plan to his company’s board later this month, part of an efficiency initiative born of diesel fines and the need to stay ahead of rivals. While the move would lessen Audi’s importance in the group, VW would stand to save big on R&D costs. Meanwhile, Ford might get access to VW’s electric vehicle architecture.

“The strategy plan doesn’t only cover the next five years, but looks a decade ahead,” one of the sources said.

The proposal reportedly focuses on — what else? — autonomous and electric vehicle development, which no automaker can be without these days. Ford isn’t the only potential technology partner, but it gets top billing in this report. The two automakers already have a partnership that’s pretty wide-ranging in scope, though neither company has come out and said exactly where the tie-up will take them.

An Audi spokesman told Reuters there’s been no decision made on Audi’s role as the group’s autonomous driving developer. The division rolled out its latest driver-assist features in the new A8 earlier this year.

While autonomy can wait, at least for a bit, electric vehicle are a much more pressing matter in hyper-regulated Europe, as well as markets like China. VW has them almost ready to go; Ford, not so much. The Blue Oval brand took it on the chin in Europe in the last fiscal quarter, and VW’s dedicated MEB electric architecture would provide the company with the basis for a range of potentially profitable small electric cars.

In exchange for this, the sources claim, Ford might provide VW with something it desperately needs: a truck platform, and the engines to go with it. Alternatively, VW might invest in Ford’s self-driving efforts in exchange for the MEB platform.

As both automakers remain tight-lipped about the potential fruits of their partnership, we’re left waiting until VW’s Nov. 16 supervisory board meeting to see what Diess puts on the table.

[Images: Volkswagen Group]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 10 comments
  • Davekaybsc Davekaybsc on Nov 03, 2018

    I don't imagine Henry would love the fact that Ford decided to take their toys and go home because making anything other than SUVs and pickups is like, really hard. That, and what's become of Lincoln. I recently saw a 1938 Lincoln Model K V-12 touring coupe at a museum in California, that was the S-class coupe of its era. Compared to that, the modern, recently abandoned Continental doesn't come within a mile.

    • See 4 previous
    • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Nov 05, 2018

      @raph "What are Lincolns these days except a ploy by Ford to get old codgers to cough up a few extra dollars on slightly different shared platforms." The most successful Lexuses & Audis are the same thing and have been succeeding for over 20 years. Platforms don't have to be bespoke and RWD to be appropriate for luxury cars... if they did, Cadillac and Jaguar would not be knocking on heaven's doors. 99% of luxury customers don't give a crap about platforms; they buy on brand, experience and (relative) value.

  • WallMeerkat WallMeerkat on Nov 05, 2018

    I do think Skoda would be an easy fix for those missing Ford's cars. The Octavia could replace the Focus and Superb as Fusion. Federalisation should be straightforward as they are basically Golf/Passat based. Or perhaps some SEATs, the Leon is close in spirit to the Focus. Not sure if they could or would federalize a Fabia/Polo/Ibiza/A1.

    • Dtremit Dtremit on Nov 05, 2018

      Ford doesn't have a shortage of federalized platforms to sell here; they have a shortage of willingness to do so. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Passat-derived Mondeo replacement outside of NA, though.

  • 3-On-The-Tree 2014 Ford F150 Ecoboost 3.5L. By 80,000mi I had to have the rear main oil seal replaced twice. Driver side turbo leaking had to have all hoses replaced. Passenger side turbo had to be completely replaced. Engine timing chain front cover leak had to be replaced. Transmission front pump leak had to be removed and replaced. Ford renewed my faith in Extended warranty’s because luckily I had one and used it to the fullest. Sold that truck on caravan and got me a 2021 Tundra Crewmax 4x4. Not a fan of turbos and I will never own a Ford again much less cars with turbos to include newer Toyotas. And I’m a Toyota guy.
  • Duke Woolworth Weight 4800# as I recall.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X '19 Nissan Frontier @78000 miles has been oil changes ( eng/ diffs/ tranny/ transfer). Still on original brakes and second set of tires.
  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÜV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
Next