By on November 3, 2018

VW logo, Image: Volkswagen

According to sources who spoke to Reuters, Volkswagen Group has more interest in pursuing technological relationships with new partners, especially Ford, than continuing on with Audi as its main development hub. At least for a while.

VW CEO Herbert Diess will reportedly unveil a 10-year plan to his company’s board later this month, part of an efficiency initiative born of diesel fines and the need to stay ahead of rivals. While the move would lessen Audi’s importance in the group, VW would stand to save big on R&D costs. Meanwhile, Ford might get access to VW’s electric vehicle architecture.

“The strategy plan doesn’t only cover the next five years, but looks a decade ahead,” one of the sources said.

The proposal reportedly focuses on — what else? — autonomous and electric vehicle development, which no automaker can be without these days. Ford isn’t the only potential technology partner, but it gets top billing in this report. The two automakers already have a partnership that’s pretty wide-ranging in scope, though neither company has come out and said exactly where the tie-up will take them.

An Audi spokesman told Reuters there’s been no decision made on Audi’s role as the group’s autonomous driving developer. The division rolled out its latest driver-assist features in the new A8 earlier this year.

While autonomy can wait, at least for a bit, electric vehicle are a much more pressing matter in hyper-regulated Europe, as well as markets like China. VW has them almost ready to go; Ford, not so much. The Blue Oval brand took it on the chin in Europe in the last fiscal quarter, and VW’s dedicated MEB electric architecture would provide the company with the basis for a range of potentially profitable small electric cars.

In exchange for this, the sources claim, Ford might provide VW with something it desperately needs: a truck platform, and the engines to go with it. Alternatively, VW might invest in Ford’s self-driving efforts in exchange for the MEB platform.

As both automakers remain tight-lipped about the potential fruits of their partnership, we’re left waiting until VW’s Nov. 16 supervisory board meeting to see what Diess puts on the table.

[Images: Volkswagen Group]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “Volkswagen Might Put Audi on the Back Burner, Spend More Time With Ford: Report...”


  • avatar
    phxmotor

    The people’s car company + The people’s car company.
    Henry would love it. Ferdinand would love it.

    Either that… or perhaps they are both rolling over
    in their grave right now.

  • avatar
    Davekaybsc

    I don’t imagine Henry would love the fact that Ford decided to take their toys and go home because making anything other than SUVs and pickups is like, really hard.

    That, and what’s become of Lincoln. I recently saw a 1938 Lincoln Model K V-12 touring coupe at a museum in California, that was the S-class coupe of its era. Compared to that, the modern, recently abandoned Continental doesn’t come within a mile.

    • 0 avatar
      raph

      “I recently saw a 1938 Lincoln Model K V-12 touring coupe at a museum in California, that was the S-class coupe of its era. Compared to that, the modern, recently abandoned Continental doesn’t come within a mile.”

      Ford cost engineered the brand into irrelevance. What are Lincolns these days except a ploy by Ford to get old codgers to cough up a few extra dollars on slightly different shared platforms. Ergo just a hollowed out shell lacking any real substance

      • 0 avatar
        el scotto

        Lincoln’s been like that since the 70’s. T-Bird/Mark1-5, or so; Town Car/LTD. At least they had Ford truck engines in them. Now a four door Mustang as a Mark X? Yes, please. Sadly, the days of American luxo-barges has passed with the Chrysler 300 being the outlier. Caddy and Buick try and thousands leave for the imports. Anywhoo, Ford should share the electric car tech with VW and slot Golfs and Jettas in for Fiestas and Focuii. Or just merge the companies; the fits aren’t bad. Possible Amaroks built in LOuisville?

      • 0 avatar
        sportyaccordy

        “What are Lincolns these days except a ploy by Ford to get old codgers to cough up a few extra dollars on slightly different shared platforms.”

        The most successful Lexuses & Audis are the same thing and have been succeeding for over 20 years. Platforms don’t have to be bespoke and RWD to be appropriate for luxury cars… if they did, Cadillac and Jaguar would not be knocking on heaven’s doors. 99% of luxury customers don’t give a crap about platforms; they buy on brand, experience and (relative) value.

  • avatar
    WallMeerkat

    I do think Skoda would be an easy fix for those missing Ford’s cars. The Octavia could replace the Focus and Superb as Fusion. Federalisation should be straightforward as they are basically Golf/Passat based.

    Or perhaps some SEATs, the Leon is close in spirit to the Focus.

    Not sure if they could or would federalize a Fabia/Polo/Ibiza/A1.

    • 0 avatar
      dtremit

      Ford doesn’t have a shortage of federalized platforms to sell here; they have a shortage of willingness to do so.

      I wouldn’t be surprised to see a Passat-derived Mondeo replacement outside of NA, though.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Corey Lewis: how dare!
  • d4rksabre: I’ve always wanted to do this but it seems like it would be tricky. I assume you need the dealer to...
  • stingray65: Very interesting analysis of the future of EVs as evidenced by the lack of new capacity and low prices...
  • davefromcalgary: Sweet Buick ;-)
  • Corey Lewis: That’s not much of a story though!

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States