2019 Ram 1500 Aces Crash Tests, Stymied by Headlights

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
2019 ram 1500 aces crash tests stymied by headlights

You win some, you lose some. For Fiat Chrysler, the new Ram 1500 represents more of a win, both in terms of quality, drive experience, and especially crash ratings, which just rolled in from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The previous-generation 1500 lost marks in two areas: driver-side small-overlap front impacts (a weakness it shares with FCA’s rear-drive passenger cars) and roof strength. Both of these tests earned the 2018 1500 a “marginal” rating from the IIHS, sinking its overall score. FCA engineers clearly did their homework — the new truck aced all crash tests. Too bad about those peepers, though.

Announced Thursday, the 2019 Ram 1500 relegates those marginal ratings to the past, scoring a “good” rating in all six IIHS crash tests.

“The new Ram 1500 also earns a good rating in the passenger-side small overlap test,” the IIHS said. “The previous version hadn’t been tested for passenger-side protection. Both small overlap ratings apply to trucks built after July, when the cab mounts to the vehicle frame were improved.”

The previous-gen Ram showed its age when stacked up against competing domestic pickups; its roof strength was the worst tested in its segment. Now there’s accolades all around, and the institute provided a further nod for Ram’s optional front crash prevention system. “In IIHS track tests at 12 mph and 25 mph, the vehicle avoided a crash,” the institute stated.

Unfortunately for FCA, engineers didn’t work magic on the Ram’s headlights, which earn the same marginal rating as last year’s model. This keeps the new 1500 out of the running for the highly marketable IIHS Top Safety Pick award. (It’s certainly not alone in the foiled-by-lights camp — headlamp performance is generally quite bad. Maybe proposed changes to federal rules will help things.)

For a back-to-back comparison of old and new Ram 1500 generations, here’s the tests for your viewing enjoyment.

[Images: IIHS]

Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • Ar_ken Ar_ken on Nov 08, 2018

    The same test that Volvo aced with its 10 year old design back then? (Although passenger side was not tested,but still...) VERY impressive there FCA....

    • MLS MLS on Nov 09, 2018

      What's that supposed to mean? Ram meets most stringent current standards. What more do you want?

  • Marmot Marmot on Nov 09, 2018

    Ram accomplished this in one year, while the Toyota 4-Runner has had bad crash results for many years and nothing has been done. Same with Tundra, and now the Sienna has been found lacking. What is Toyota thinking?

  • Inside Looking Out Enforcing laws? It is so yesterday! Welcome to California!
  • Lou_BC You'd think cops would have an understanding of the laws they are supposed to enforce.
  • Merlyn I’m on my second Spark and love it! I can pass any car I’ve never had a problem going up a hill it does just fine. As for cargo I can fit three suitcases, two book bags and still have the front seat for a passenger. Not sure what point this guy is trying to make. I have hand free phone service and Sirius radio plug in my phone and have navigation. I would buy another spark in a heartbeat.
  • Buickman I won't own one and I'll be happy!
  • Jeanbaptiste Ever since y’all started sending your damn geese down here we’re just been waiting for one of you to show up.