Seatbelt-related Fires Spark Recall of Two Million Ford F-150s

seatbelt related fires spark recall of two million ford f 150s

As far as safety recalls go, this one’s pretty sizeable, and it impacts a company that’s seen a lot of money lost on safety recalls in recent years. Ford Motor Company has announced the recall of nearly two million examples of the world’s best-selling vehicle to prevent the seemingly unlikely occurrence of seatbelt-related blazes.

The recall, affecting 1,995,776 trucks in North America — 1,619,112 of them in the United States, is the result of 17 documented fires or reports of smoke in 2015-2018 model year F-150 regular cabs or SuperCrew models sold stateside. Another six incidents took place in Canada.

The fires originated inside the vehicles’ B-pillar, with the seatbelt pretensioner as the source of the issue. While the life-saving device works properly to restrain the front-seat driver and passenger in the event of a crash, it’s what occurs after the device’s deployment that has Ford worried.

According to the automaker, the problem lies in the combination of three factors: the “excessive sparks” generated when the seatbelt pretensioners deploy, the exhaust gasses emitted by the device, and the close proximity of insulation within the B-pillar.

When a pretensioner activates, an electrode ignited a combustible gas at the bottom of a cylinder, pushing a piston upwards. A rack gear connected to the piston engages a gear attached to the seatbelt retractor spool during this upward motion, retracting the seatbelt so that it hugs the occupant tightly against the seat. The device exhausts the gasses generated by the combustion at the same time.

“When sufficient sparks are present, gases exhausted inside the lower portion of the B-pillar by the pretensioners may ignite,” Ford stated. “If this gas ignites, components behind the B-pillar such as insulation and carpet may subsequently catch fire.”

Documents sent to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration show a lengthy investigation occuring as incident reports piled up. Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group first began investigating after post-collision fires broke out in the B-pillar of four 2015 and 2016 F-150s between April and October of 2017. Despite an analysis of the vehicles, plus subsystem testing, Ford couldn’t come up with a cause.

Further fire reports soon came to the automaker’s attention, with Transport Canada becoming involved in November 2017 after a fire occured on its soil. A joint inspection of that F-150 failed to reveal an ignition source. Ford did, however, determine that the insulation and carpeting used met its own standards. It wasn’t until August, two months after the NHTSA contacted the company with concerns, that the group ID’d the cause.

“A comprehensive series of vehicle level tests was performed. During these tests, Ford observed interaction between pretensioner deployment sparks and exhaust gasses, resulting in momentary combustion, and in some cases, igniting material in the B-pillar area,” Ford wrote in the NHTSA document. “Testing confirmed this potential on both 2015-2017 and 2018 model year systems.”

A field action was approved on August 24th. It’s a simple fix — Ford plans to “remove the B-pillar insulation material and wiring harness tape, and install heat resistant tape.” Owners of regular cab models will see the dealer modify the back interior panel of their pickup cabs.

The recall ( which is free of charge, is expected to begin on September 24th.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Gardiner Westbound Gardiner Westbound on Sep 06, 2018

    Regulators seem to have lost the plot: a) GDI engines that require extraordinary maintenance to regain fuel mileage and emissions compliance, b) Turbocharged engines that generate high MPG numbers in gentle laboratory testing but not in real world driving, c) Gazillion-speed transmissions that cost a king's ransom to rebuild post warranty, likely resulting in early scrappage, d) Exploding airbag inflators have killed over a dozen occupants and caused countless injuries, e) ABS brakes that theoretically allow one to steer around danger while braking. How many know this? How many have the sphincter control to manage it in an emergency? f) And now, seat belt tensioners that can fricassee crash survivors!

  • Megaphone Megaphone on Sep 06, 2018

    Another fine bit of engineering by Ford. Remember the Pinto anyone?

    • Jpolicke Jpolicke on Sep 06, 2018

      Ahh, the good old days, when you could buy a fire trap for peanuts.

  • SCE to AUX Irony is everywhere:[list][*]The mfrs come to Washington asking for a steak, but get a burger instead. Gov't says "we gave you a meal."[/*][*]The alleged purpose behind EV subsidies is to clean up the air, but domestic content requirements means it's really an American nationalist agenda.[/*][*]Tesla lobbied against more subsidies on philosophical grounds, but got them anyway.[/*][*]Rebates on used EVs will drive up the price of used EVs.[/*][*]EV startups necessarily start with higher models, then work down-market. The new rules shut out Rivian and Lucid just as they are trying to get traction. But maybe - as with Tesla ca. 2018 - they won't lose high-dollar customers over a 'few bucks'.[/*][/list]What a mess.
  • Ajla Much like with CAFE I think the new MSRP limits should be set to a single level instead of $55K for cars and $80K for "trucks".
  • Bullnuke There was an interesting comment from the chief of a fire department made today concerning EV fires. "They're like trick birthday candles. They look like they're out and then they're on fire again.". I haven't noted a special subsidy or funding for the nation's fire departments regarding fire suppression training or equipment to combat "trick birthday candles".
  • ToolGuy Name two innovations spearheaded by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation.
  • FreedMike …but did they ever partner with Stutz?
Next