Two Scoops of Brawn: 2019 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro Packs a Premium

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

With half-ton pickup facades now verging on grotesque, we’ll miss the Toyota Tundra’s appealing, chrome-heavy grille when the model inevitably gives way to a fresh generation. Speaking of fresh, the Tundra ain’t it. Bowing for the 2007 model year, the second-generation Tundra soldiers into 2019 relatively unchanged, though there’s improvements at the top of the range.

No, Toyota hasn’t put the model on a weight loss regimen or finessed its powertrain, but it has added off-road capability. And for this newfound ruggedness, you’d better be prepared to cough up more cash.

According to order guides seen by CarsDirect, the Tundra TRD Pro, back and somewhat better than ever after skipping a model year, sets the pricing bar high. Featuring the toughest legs in the Tundra line (read about the TRD Pro upgrades here), the 2019 model reaches $51,275 after destination. That’s $3,870 more than the 2017 model and less than a grand below the 2018 Ford F-150 Raptor SuperCab’s sticker.

Available only in crew cab guise, this TRD Pro approaches the price of a 2018 Tundra 1794 Edition — the gaudy, ultra-lux Tundra variant that didn’t exactly find a home in my heart. That King Ranch rival tips the pricing scales at $51,725 after destination.

Perhaps that double hood scoop is for hoovering up money.

Regardless of the canyon-bombing potential of the off-road Tundra’s new 2.5-inch Fox internal-bypass shocks and other specialized suspension kit, this model’s bones are painfully dated compared to its full-size competition. Ford’s F-150 is still young, and both the Ram and General Motors twins gain new engines and a lighter, restyled body this year. And yet the Tundra seems unwilling to move on. Toyota clearly has better things to invest in.

Automotive News‘ product pipeline says a full revamp won’t occur until the 2022 model year, so there’s still time to get into a strong-but-dated pickup with a great grille and dismal fuel economy. Tundra sales fell 10.1 percent in July, year over year, but the model’s year-to-date tally remains in the black. Over the first seven months of 2018, Tundra sales rose 1.7 percent.

Indeed, U.S. Tundra volume remains extremely consistent, varying only by a few thousand units each year since 2013.

[Images: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Aug 20, 2018

    Third rate truck maker who doesn't appear to be very serious about keeping their product current. At least these third rate trucks are durable and relatively maintenance free. Otherwise ISIS and the related middle eastern nice people would be buying Honduh Ridgelines - the sticking point is how do you mount the required guns when the covered catbox in the bed of the Ridgeline is in the way?

  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Aug 20, 2018

    Needs a raisin theme on the inside to go with the two scoops...

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next