Tesla Buyers Reach Back Into the Public Purse After Court Ruling

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

We told you earlier this month that Tesla’s Canadian arm was suing the Ontario government for access to big rebates for some of its vehicles. For years, Ontario, located north of Erie, Pennsylvania, handed out up to $14,000 in taxpayer cash to electric vehicle buyers, part of its effort to support green living.

Over the years, the ceiling of eligible MSRPs varied — from unlimited, to $75k, to $150k, and back to $75k, shortly before the ousting of the previous government in this June’s election. This writer made his feelings on lofty EV subsidies quite clear.

While the cancellation of the province’s Electric and Hydrogen Vehicle Incentive Program (EHVIP) came with a grace period for buyers awaiting delivery that runs out on September 10th, it didn’t include Tesla buyers. Thanks to the automaker’s lawsuit, Tesla buyers can now grab back that $14,000.

According to a CBC report, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sided with Tesla after declaring the government’s reasoning shaky. Ontario stated in early July that only vehicles purchased from a traditional dealer would get the grace period, whereas direct sales would end immediately.

Tesla’s Canadian branch said the decision inflicted “substantial harm,” with many would-be customers cancelling their orders after learning they wouldn’t be eligible for the rebate. The brand was “deliberately and arbitrarily” targeted, it said.

“We’re pleased with the Court’s decision to strike down the [Ontario government’s] transition plan as unfair and unlawful,” a Tesla representative told CBC. Tesla Canada argued that, as an Ontario-licensed dealer, it is just as eligible for the rebate as GM or Nissan.

In the court’s decision, Justice Frederick L. Myers wrote, “The [Government of Ontario’s] asserted rationale for limiting the transition program to franchised dealerships is laden with factual assumptions that were susceptible to being proved or disproved with evidence.”

This might not be the final word on the issue. Through a spokesperson, Ontario Attorney General Caroline Mulroney said the government is “reviewing the ruling and will make a decision on how to proceed in the coming days.”

In fairness to Tesla Model 3 buyers, many other car shoppers also benefited from the rebate, including those lusting after the Chevrolet Bolt, Chevrolet Volt, Nissan Leaf, Chrysler Pacifica PHEV, and other green machines. Lesser sums were paid to buyers of plug-in hybrids with lower seating capacities and smaller batteries.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 25 comments
  • Vehic1 Vehic1 on Aug 28, 2018

    Not particularly a Tesla fan - but GM, Chrysler, and even Ford were saved by gubmint bailouts, and the oil industry has received Billions in subsidies over the years.

    • See 1 previous
    • Thelaine Thelaine on Aug 29, 2018

      This is the most tired rationale for Tesla subsidies. This argument justifies any subsidy of anything anyone personally wants. The government subsidizes GM, so why can't they subsidize my swimming pool or my neighbor's sludge factory? After all, he employs ten idiots who would otherwise be on welfare or crack. This is weak. We should be moving in the opposite direction. The size of government and the amount of debt and waste are so great as to be almost literally incomprehensible. We need fewer subsidies and less government, not more. Tesla is a poster child for subsidy-sucking greed monkeys like Musk and all his wealthy entitlement-gobbling customers and acolytes.

  • Vehic1 Vehic1 on Aug 28, 2018

    stingray65: I thought someone? wanted to end the supposed "war on coal" because heat waves are a hoax?, but it seems they expect to get paid by the rest of us to do it.

  • Bd2 Eh, the Dollar has held up well against most other currencies and the IRA is actually investing in critical industries, unlike the $6 Trillion in pandemic relief/stimulus which was just a cash giveaway (also rife with fraud).What Matt doesn't mention is that the price of fuel (particularly diesel) is higher relative to the price of oil due to US oil producers exporting records amount of oil and refiners exporting records amount of fuel. US refiners switched more and more production to diesel fuel, which lowers the supply of gas here (inflating prices). But shouldn't that mean low prices for diesel?Nope, as refiners are just exporting the diesel overseas, including to Mexico.
  • Jor65756038 As owner of an Opel Ampera/Chevrolet Volt and a 1979 Chevy Malibu, I will certainly not buy trash like the Bolt or any SUV or crossover. If GM doesn´t offer a sedan, then I will buy german, sweedish, italian, asian, Tesla or whoever offers me a sedan. Not everybody like SUV´s or crossovers or is willing to buy one no matter what.
  • Bd2 While Hyundai has enough models that offer a hybrid variant, problem has been inadequate supply, so this should help address that.In particular, US production of PHEVs will make them eligible for the tax credit.
  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
Next