QOTD: How Much Do You Hate Stop-Start Technology?


One of my biggest pet peeves is the very existence of stop-start systems in modern vehicles. In theory, they’re intended to improve fuel economy by shutting down the engine while the car is stationary — when you’re effectively getting zero miles per gallon. In practice, they’re more of a nuisance than anything else. Every time I’m in a car that’s unfamiliar to me and the system shuts down the engine at a stop light, there is a fraction of a second where I assume something has gone terribly wrong and my stomach drops out of my body and onto the seat. Maybe I’ve just driven too many junkers but the sensation is always unsettling to a point where I have to deactivate the system to maintain peace of mind.
I am also fairly confident that repeatedly cycling your engine in stop-and-go traffic isn’t great for the crankshaft and a host of other components, even if the manufacturer is trying its utmost to mitigate the issue. But I’m aware that some people don’t mind their vehicle becoming a jittery, broken-feeling mess in an urban environment so long as it saves them some fuel in the long run. Unfortunately, that information hasn’t made me hate it any less.
What about you? Is stop-start technology the bane of your driving existence or a necessary evil in the war on emissions?
In a half-hearted attempt to play devil’s advocate, I can acknowledge that the system does help some larger engines fly beneath the EPA’s radar by improving fuel economy during city driving. You can also shut the system down (every single time you enter the vehicle) if you don’t want to deal with it.
It should also be said that the technology works far better on hybrid vehicles — thanks to a bigger battery and integrated electric motor. This results in a sensation that doesn’t feel like you are destroying the vehicle every time you ask it to resume operation. Likewise, more recent editions of stop-start technology are decidedly less obnoxious than their earlier counterparts. But I can’t name any since manufacturer who has gotten it so right that it would be forgivable on anything other than the laziest of Sunday drives.
As for the reliability aspect, automakers have upped their lubrication, hardware, and battery games to avoid disaster. However, how effective this will be when you’re asking the system to work overtime is still unclear. I’m skeptical of the durability of any motor that is asked to start up twenty times or more often every single day. There’s also the matter of how much fuel you’ll actually conserve. If your commute includes 30 minutes of gridlock, then you’re likely to notice savings at the pump. Otherwise, automatic stop-start seems rather unnecessary.
That won’t keep it from becoming ubiquitous, though. With automakers seeking to improve fleet-wide efficiency in order to keep regulators off their backs, there’s no way in hell this technology will vanish overnight. If it’s going to die, people will have to come out against it in droves — just like in my dream.
[Image: Ford Motor Co.]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Spectator Mustang at M4 money is a tough sell (and I owned an S550). That said, I like the GT mostly loaded in the high 50s over the M2.
- Spectator Manual transmission appears to be a theft deterrent from what I’ve read…save the manuals for safety!
- Spectator It’s impressive that Tesla has reached market with an electric semi before any existing semi manufacturer, and the only issue thus far is this. It will be interesting to see how these units fare after 500k miles in retail operations.
- JMII I had the sedan version of this same car... same engine, same tranny. I have NO idea how this owner managed to keep it looking so good. The interior on ours literally fell apart after about 4 years: I'm talking about peeling plastic and fabric sagging on the door trim and roof, while various parts simply broke off with no warning - including the glove box handle and the power window regulators failed multiple times (a typical VW problem as noted in the listing). I've never seen an interior disintegrate like this, parts snapped or scratched like they were made out of cheapest, thinnest plastic on the planet. Not just interior parts either: the left turn signal housing just feel off one day and the windshield wipers gave up the ghost. It leaked coolant and any parts/service for it were way overpriced, a prime example was a replacement antenna cost $300! WTF? Guess that was one of those high end Audi parts! At around the 8 year mark the trip computer display faded to point where you could only read it at night which was a real shame. Then the tie rods and suspension gave out along with the ABS system. It was almost like the car was only designed to survive for 60K miles. With each passing mile more random parts broke, for example one day a spring fell out from under the drivers seat. How does that even happen? By 80K (in 9 years) this car was a complete mess, it looked like it had been trashed on the inside despite being garage kept and only driven my wife (no kids either). Since there was nothing wrong with the engine I drove it to 100K but the last year of ownership was down right painful as the car shook and squealed constantly as it crumbled to pieces. I refused to put any money into it, I just kept driving it. On the way to trade it in (for my Nissan 350Z) the cruise control stopped working and the sunroof controls fell off in my hand! I've never been so happy to get rid of a car in my entire life! Don't walk RUN AWAY.
- Analoggrotto Just what the Teslarati need to keep things exciting in bed.
Comments
Join the conversation
I experienced this first in a small rental Ford in the UK, as if coping with RHD and roundabouts wasn't enough pressure. Those jitters got very trying in heavy stop-go traffic. I agree with the feeling that the long term wear and tear to engine components must be considerable, more so if your daily commute always includes bouts of walking pace traffic.
Another high tec stupidity!