Man on the Edge: New York Times Interview Shows Elon Musk at His Lowest

man on the edge em new york times em interview shows elon musk at his lowest

It’s a portrait of a man who’s gone past fraying at the edges. In an hour-long interview with the New York Times, Tesla CEO Elon Musk appears as a man threatening to come apart — and it’s not a joyous sight.

Despite the frustration stemming from Musk’s actions and pronouncements, and the aggravation born of his cheerleading, conspiracy theorizing fan base, it’s difficult to watch a man’s ambition and drive spiral into self-destruction.

Musk teared up frequently during the interview, the NYT claims. Working up to 120 hours a week and sometimes spending three or four days inside the automaker’s Fremont, California assembly plant, Musk claims he doesn’t sleep much, even with help from the now-controversial sleep aid Ambien. Instead, the drug provides the impulse for late-night tweetstorms that immerse the CEO in hot water and increase the polarization of this fans and detractors.

Recent bizarre actions like publicly mulling a journalist ratings site (“Pravda”) and calling a British cave rescuer a pedophile pale, at least in terms of consequences, next to one tweet Musk sent from his car. That, of course, would be the August 7th tweet declaring his intention to take Tesla private. Funding, he wrote, was secured.

And yet it wasn’t. Per the NYT:

Mr. Musk has said he was referring to a potential investment by Saudi Arabia’s government investment fund. Mr. Musk had extensive talks with representatives of the $250 billion fund about possibly financing a transaction to take Tesla private — maybe even in a manner that would have resulted in the Saudis’ owning most of the company. One of those sessions took place on July 31 at the Tesla factory in the Bay Area, according to a person familiar with the meeting. But the Saudi fund had not committed to provide any cash, two people briefed on the discussions said.

Another possibility under consideration is that SpaceX, Mr. Musk’s rocket company, would help bankroll the Tesla privatization and would take an ownership stake in the carmaker, according to people familiar with the matter.

Directors on Tesla’s board claim the tweet blindsided them. Musk himself admits in the interview that no one saw or reviewed it before he hit “send.” Sources tell the NYT that board members scrambled to craft a public statement explaining the tweet and diffusing the already mounting criticism. Musk’s tweet lacked details, and a Tesla blog post posted not long after failed to answer the question of whether funding was indeed secured.

This didn’t go unnoticed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which quickly launched an investigation into the tweet. Recent reports state the SEC resorted to subpoenas in its bid to learn who’s backing the go-private deal. Shareholders aren’t happy about being left in the dark, either. Three have already filed lawsuits.

In the interview, Musk speaks of social isolation from friends and family, a byproduct of Tesla’s frenzied Model 3 production push.

“I thought the worst of it was over — I thought it was,” he said. “The worst is over from a Tesla operational standpoint.”

He added, somewhat cryptically, “But from a personal pain standpoint, the worst is yet to come.”

Sources with knowledge of Tesla’s board claim there’s a hunt on for a right-hand man, someone who can take pressure off of Musk. Some directors fear the volatile combination of Ambien and Twitter in Musk’s hands, they claim, with others worried about recreational drug use.

That’s what sources claim. In public, the members remain committed to their leader, issuing a statement in response to the newspaper’s questions:

“There have been many false and irresponsible rumors in the press about the discussions of the Tesla board,” the statement read. “We would like to make clear that Elon’s commitment and dedication to Tesla is obvious. Over the past 15 years, Elon’s leadership of the Tesla team has caused Tesla to grow from a small start-up to having hundreds of thousands of cars on the road that customers love, employing tens of thousands of people around the world, and creating significant shareholder value in the process.”

Musk himself mused about a possible successor, despite claiming he won’t step down as CEO and chairman.

“If you have anyone who can do a better job, please let me know,” he said. “They can have the job. Is there someone who can do the job better? They can have the reins right now.”

It’s too late to put the genie back in the bottle. The Model 3 is in production, some of which occurs in tents, backed by a lengthy list of reservation holders eager to fill their driveway. Ardent superfans have turned Musk into their deity, with any criticisms levelled at the man or his operation attributed to short sellers and covert operatives of Big Oil. Tesla is what it is.

But at the root of its problems is speed. Growing too fast. Issuing production promises far too grand, then building cars in an all-hands-on-deck flurry. Stacking the pipeline with products like the Model Y and Semi and pickup truck, despite barely managing Model 3 production.

It’s too fast. And the speed hasn’t had a positive impact on Musk’s health.

This isn’t said out of malice, but by all appearances Musk needs help beyond what Ambien can provide. Help that’s within his grasp as a man of means. And help that might ensure a healthier future for both himself and Tesla.

[Image: OnInnovation/ Flickr ( CC BY-ND 2.0)]

Join the conversation
2 of 69 comments
  • Conslaw Conslaw on Aug 19, 2018

    A paid-for factory can't solve all the ills of a carmaker. Ford's St. Paul factory was not only long-since paid for when they shut it down, but they effectively got free power from hydroelectrics on site. If you can't find something to build with a paid for factory, a trained labor force, and free power, you're f- uh, fried.

  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Aug 20, 2018

    And he wants someone to ride his space junk to Mars? Poor Muskrat. Instead of being focused on doing one thing extremely well, he is over stretched onto a myriad of things that he can't achieve squat doing. I'd go nuts if I kept living in Lala Land instead of dealing with reality.

  • Master Baiter The D-bag elites like Al Gore demanding that we all switch to EVs are the type of people who don't actually drive. They get chauffeured around in black Yukon Denalis. Tesla does have a good charging network--maybe someday they will produce a car that doesn't suck.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird As a Challenger GT awd owner I lIke it’s heritage inspired styling a lot. There’s a lot of 66-67 as well as 68-70 Charger in there. It’s refreshing that it doesn’t look like a blob like Tesla, Volt/Bolt, Mach-e BMW I whatever etc. The fact that it’s a hatch makes it even better as a everyday driver thus eliminating the need for a CUV. If it’s well built and has a reliable track record I can see trading up to it in a few years.
  • Jbawden I thought sedans were dead? Coupes even more so. The core Charger/Challenger buyer is in it for the Hemi. To whom is this and the presumed EV Camaro marketed to? The ICE versions of these cars have a LOT of shortcomings, but rear drive, a V8, and a Tremec 6 speed made all that disappear. If you're forcing me into a 1,000hp appliance, then give me some visibility and practicality while your at it. And for the love of all things holy, please allow me to maintain a little dignity by leaving off the ridiculous space jam sound effects. What out of touch focus group think approved that? It's almost as embarrassing as the guy who signed off on the Pontiac Aztec.
  • Jalop1991 The simple fact is, America and Americans excel at building complex things (bridges, for example) but absolutely SUCK at maintaining them. We're too busy moving on to the next new shiny thing that a politician can get good airtime for. Fixing the bridge? Not sexy. Cutting the ribbon at a new EV charge site? Photo-op worthy. Demanding that the owner of said charging site be accountable and not let his site become the EV equivalent of a slum? Hard and not a newsworthy event.I have a PHEV and once tried some sort of public charging, just to see what happens. Failed miserably. We'd all be riding horses today if gas stations performed like EV charge stations do.
  • SCE to AUX Apps like PlugShare prove a few points:[list][*]Tesla's charging network is the best, almost always earning a 10/10.[/*][*]Dealer chargers are the worst, often blocked (ICE'd) or inaccessible behind a locked gate.[/*][*]Electrify America chargers aren't bad; my few experiences with them have been quite good. But they are also very new.[/*][*]Calling the help line is nearly useless.[/*][*]There are still charging gaps in high-travel flyover areas, which coincidentally have a lot of "Trump" flags waving in them.[/*][/list]As an EV driver and engineer, I don't understand how public chargers get so screwed up. They are simple devices. My home charger is 10 years old and has never missed a beat, but it only gets one cycle a day and lives indoors.