Leaked 2020 Mustang Shelby GT500 Specs Claim 720 Horsepower
Thanks to the internet, it’s hard to keep industry secrets. This is especially true when a product has lots of eyes on it, as at least a few of them will be of the prying variety. Fresh leaks concerning the 2020 Shelby GT500 claim Ford has added serious horsepower and a hefty curb weight to the most muscular of Mustangs.
According to documents shared via the Mustang6G forums, the new Shelby receives a 5.2-liter, port-injected V8 that produces 720 horsepower (at 7,500 rpm) and 650 ft-lb of torque (at 4,500 rpm) with help from a supercharger. However, the claimed weight distribution ought to make it more of a straight-line bruiser than the first car you’d want to take into a tight corner with a decreasing radius.
With 56.2 percent of the load distribution hovering over the front axle, the GT500 would be the least balanced pony in Ford’s stable. However, it isn’t as if the Shelby’s supercharger could be placed into the trunk or that there’s a bunch of other Mustangs with a perfect 50/50 weight distribution. They’re front-heavy cars and always have been.
Speaking of hardware and heft, all of Ford’s go-fast parts seem to have resulted in a curb weight of 4,225 pounds. Assuming these figures are accurate, that’s pretty portly. But any Ford loyalist that’s seriously interested in flinging a coupe around a racetrack has probably purchased the much lighter GT350 already.
The GT500 appears to be aimed at other autos emphasizing brute force over agility, namely the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Redeye. At 4,492 pounds, the Redeye will definitely remain a few cheeseburgers ahead of the Ford. But the pair are more evenly matched than we’d have guessed. Dodge’s output will surpass the Stang’s proposed figures, although the added weight should help Ford make up the difference.
We’re presuming the GT500 uses the current flat-plane-crank engine found in other Shelby Mustangs, based on displacement and how high it seems willing to rev. Documents list the top speed at 190 mph with an axle ratio of 3.73:1. If everything we’re reading is true, we’d expect that aspect to the most subject to change. We’re under the assumption that the specs came from a test platform, meaning Ford could swap gearing (and a few other things) prior to production.
[Images: Ford Motor Co.]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends, regulation, and the bitter-sweet nature of modern automotive tech. Research focused and gut driven.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Ernesto Perez There's a line in the movie Armageddon where Bruce Willis says " is this the best idea NASA came up with?". Don't quote me. I'm asking is this the best idea NY came up with? What's next? Charging pedestrians to walk in certain parts of the city? Every year the price for everything gets more expensive and most of the services we pay for gets worse. Obviously more money is not the solution. What we need are better ideas, strategies and inventions. You want to charge drivers in the city - then put tolls on the free bridges like the Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges. There's always a better way or product. It's just the idiots on top think they know best.
- Carsofchaos The bike lanes aren't even close to carrying "more than the car lanes replaced". You clearly don't drive in Midtown Manhattan on a daily like I do.
- Carsofchaos The problem with congestion, dear friends, is not the cars per se. I drive into the city daily and the problem is this:Your average street in the area used to be 4 lanes. Now it is a bus lane, a bike lane (now you're down to two lanes), then you have delivery trucks double parking, along with the Uber and Lyft drivers also double parking. So your 4 lane avenue is now a 1.5 lane avenue. Do you now see the problem? Congestion pricing will fix none of these things....what it WILL do is fund persion plans.
- FreedMike Many F150s I encounter are autonomously driven...and by that I mean they're driving themselves because the dips**ts at the wheel are paying attention to everything else but the road.
- Tassos A "small car", TIM????????????This is the GLE. Have you even ever SEEN the huge thing at a dealer's??? NOT even the GLC,and Merc has TWO classes even SMALLER than the C (The A and the B, you guessed it? You must be a GENIUS!).THe E is a "MIDSIZED" crossover, NOT A SMALL ONE BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, oh CLUELESS one.I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THE NONSENSE you post here every god damned day.And I BET you will never even CORRECT your NONSENSE, much less APOLOGIZE for your cluelessness and unprofessionalism.