Granite State: It Looks Like GMC's Finally Pulling the Trigger on a Sub-Terrain Crossover

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A Jeep Wrangler fighter it ain’t, but that doesn’t mean General Motors’ truck division can’t go smaller and still have buyers lining up at its door.

Spy shots taken in Arizona show not one, but three small camouflaged crossovers undergoing tests, and the horizontal chrome slats filling the grille should tip you off that there’s a future GMC vehicle under those wrappings. A small or subcompact model has long been in consideration for the brand, and one look at Buick would tell GMC brass why it’s a good idea to have an Encore-like model of its own.

However, GMC buyers would not be pleased if their new vehicle looked like a Chevrolet Trax or Encore.

As we see here, GMC isn’t following its sister divisions’ lead to the letter when it comes to styling. This model, tentatively called the Granite (GMC released a concept vehicle under that name in 2010 and trademarked the nameplate in 2015) rides atop whatever platform underpins the next-generation Trax and Encore, but looks more butch doing it.

Think back to the first-gen Terrain, and how it stood out against its Chevy sister. (Try not to think about the second-gen Terrain.) After looking at recent spy shots of the next Encore, this model appears slightly longer in body — it could be a trick, but perhaps it’s necessary to attain a more squared-off look. Check out that front overhang!

While the front-end camo ends up making this thing look like something rejected by Fiat Chrysler designers, circa 2014, it’s clear there’ll be a generous grille opening, putting further design distance between it and its siblings.

GMC boss Duncan Aldred previously said that going smaller is a logical step for the brand. Unfortunately for those GM fans who like to play in the mud, rumors of a brawny, compact off-roader failed to materialize, though this family-friendly gambit seems like the more profitable choice.

Powertrain-wise, there’s little to go on, but sharing architecture also means sharing a great deal of moving parts. The Granite, if that is the model’s name, will likely appear in 2020 and field a turbocharged 1.4-liter four-cylinder, at least as a base motor. As six speeds is still enough for the Acadia, expect a similar number of cogs in this one.

GMC’s U.S. sales rose 2.4 percent over the first half of 2018, with volume up 6.6 percent in the second quarter of the year.

[Images: Brian Williams/Spiedbilde]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Aug 14, 2018

    I would love to see the GMC Jimmy return based on a shortened Canyon/Colorado platform, a true off-road SUV. Not a copy of the Wrangler (or the ungainly TrailBlazer from other markets), but a worthy competitor. Two and four door, removable top, true 4WD. Oh, and the diesel from the Canyorado would be icing on the cake. Make it exclusive to GMC. Chevy can sell its own versions wherever GMCs aren't sold (world markets). I'm still holding out hope that Ford's Bronco will be a true off-road warrior, and perhaps it'll inspire GMC to field its own entry. The Wrangler is an icon, but like the Mustang, it deserves some serious competition. All these FWD CUVs like this, the EcoSport, Kicks, etc- I get why they exist (there is obviously a market for them), but they're far from the enthusiast's consideration (unless he/she is buying them for their college-attending daughter, or grandmother in the case of the Encore).

    • Scott25 Scott25 on Aug 15, 2018

      Agree, bringing back the Jimmy name for that purpose is so obvious. The Bronco will be a bellweather, determining if the Xterra returns, if Toyota makes a small off-roadish utility, and if GMC enters that space. They just need more proof than the 4Runner that a proper SUV that isn’t the Wrangler will sell.

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Aug 15, 2018

    I absolutely loved the Granite concept car when it came out almost a decade ago. That was near the end of GM's clean-lined and cohesive designs, before they became hunday and started throwing blobby lines everywhere to eliminate negative space. I'd have bought one of those, but this may as well keep the camo on.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next