Unsubscribed: The Problem With Car Subscription Services

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Automakers are trying everything under the sun to turn a larger profit these days. Building and selling cars is no longer enough. Manufacturers now offer data plans, rental services, lifestyle products, and much more. One of the newest additions to their collective portfolio is the subscription plan — which yields customers a vehicle, insurance, maintenance, and other perks for a monthly fee.

However, as the concept is preparing to enter the mainstream market, the value of such programs have been called into question. While subscription services look like one-stop shopping, often providing users with the ability to swap models throughout the year, their cost effectiveness comes into doubt when one examines the bottom line. We’ve been skeptical for a while but Edmunds recently crunched the numbers to find out for sure.

“At these price points that we’re seeing, [a subscription service] virtually makes no sense to anyone,” Edmunds senior analyst Ivan Drury told Automotive News during a presentation on industry trends.

Using BMW’s $3,700 per month subscription plan as an example, he showed exactly how much more the program can cost customers. Access by BMW gives access to high-end vehicles such as the X6 M but it comes to $133,200, or double what it would cost to lease the vehicle for three years. Keep in mind that swapping to a less expensive model during that time would effectively reduce the plan’s cost effectiveness even further.

“If you went the other route versus the subscription cost … you could essentially have two,” Drury elaborated. “You can make your own miniature fleet. You don’t even need to use their program. So, it’s not going to be worthwhile for a lot of people who are going to do the math. It’s just a rich person’s toy.”

BMW does offer a less expensive subscription program at $2,000 per month. But, based up leasing offers we found on the more expensive models in its U.S. rotation (the M2 Competition and X5 xDrive40e iPerformance), you’re still spending nearly double. Although, subscription plans from other manufacturers don’t seem quite so bad if you spend the majority of your time in the more expensive models.

The Mercedes-Benz Collection plan starts at $1,095 and still nets you the concierge service that has a Daimler employee dropping off your chosen vehicle at a predetermined location. It’s still more expensive than leasing but, if you’re really into car swapping and like the white-glove treatment, it’s a semi-affordable alternative to BMW.

However, a spokesperson from Mercedes said that the comparison between the subscription plans and leasing wasn’t exactly fair. “This is not competing with leases,” the company said. “It’s for different needs, different mindsets, different psychographics. They’re paying a premium for the ability to do what you can’t do out of any other type of automobile acquisition.”

Fair enough, but there are examples of it being done in a way that will make you think twice about leasing. Care by Volvo is a subscription plan that has come with some problems. Customers have seen their delivery dates pushed back repeatedly as they wait for a vehicle. However, the pricing is actually competitive when you account for the added costs associated with leasing (insurance, down payments, etc). But whole point of a subscription service is access to a premium experience and ease of use, regardless of if you’re trying to hop into a $105,000 BMW X6 M or $33,000 Volvo XC40. If that aspect of it fails, then it’s impossible to rationalize the added expense.

Other brands have seen troubles as well but it has often been due to a limited supply of vehicles to meet demand. That sounds like a major victory for the automakers but it has been unclear if the issue stems from an overwhelming response from consumers or simply a problem with logistics

Will these services eventually be rolled out into mainstream brands? Most likely. “[The] thing that I think would be far more appealing from a regular consumer standpoint is having a diverse lineup,” said Drury. “These luxury automakers — they don’t have a minivan, they don’t have a pickup, they don’t have these other things that on occasion you might actually want to borrow.”

Edmunds claims that the mass-market appeal of such services lies in the ability to draw from a diverse lineup. With luxury manufacturers you really only have sporting sedans/coupes and SUVs. But that stable would be exceptionally diverse from an automaker like Fiat Chrysler, presuming it gave you access to all of its brands. Of course, that hasn’t happened yet but FCA is launching its Jeep Wave membership program offering three-tiers of access sometime next year.

While it will offer many of the same perks as its upscale competitors, it will cater to a broader demographic. Up until now, most of the subscription plans have had names like “ Book by Cadillac” and “Porsche Passport.” However, pricing for the mainstream market remains an issue. Would customers on a tighter budget be comfortable paying a premium on Ford vehicles when they’re only going to want the F-150 a couple times per year?

We think car sharing services like Zip Car and General Motors’ Maven may have already nipped this in the bud. There are also traditional rental outfits that can take care of most other needs. If you only need a pickup truck or utility van for the day, you can rent one with relative ease. You might not get the cleanest vehicle in the best condition, and you’ll have to pay a daily or hourly rate for it, but you will also probably end up saving money in the long run against any subscription service.

[Image: BMW]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 74 comments
  • MoparRocker74 MoparRocker74 on Jul 16, 2018

    For something like an electric or autonomous car I can see this as a slightly higher end Uber/Lyft. I mean its not like anyone will want to actually 'own' a self driving box. For us enthusiasts, if a cheap ride subscription justifies something cool in the garage (Wrangler, Hellcat, Ram) for nice sunny days, date nights, camping trips, etc while letting a hailed on the spot appliance to deal with the commute in snow/salt, kid hauling and grocery getting...might be worth it. The smart move for the D3 would be to offer 'appliance service' for those who buy a corvette, hellcat, etc. They make their profits on niche vehicles anyway, but everyone needs a commuter box at some point. Being able to use and abuse one when needed makes that nice car purchase more than attainable...

  • Lagunadallas Lagunadallas on Jul 16, 2018

    These services will fail at these prices. $3,700/month for an X6M?!? I have a 2017 X5M (leased) and a 2013 Bentley Continental GT with a CPO warranty (financed with 20% down), and COMBINED they cost me LESS per month than $3,700 including gas and insurance... plus maintenance is already covered on the BMW. Good luck with that!

  • MaintenanceCosts If the top works, it’s a minor miracle. If the top doesn’t work, this is nothing more than a GTI with a weaker structure and 600 pounds of permanent ballast.
  • SCE to AUX Anybody can make a cheap EV, but will it have the specs people want? Tesla is best positioned to do it, but achieving good specs could turn their profits negative.
  • MaintenanceCosts All depends on battery prices. Electric cars can undercut gas cars easily if they drop. If they stay the same or go up, there’s not much fat left for Tesla to cut out of the Model 3.
  • ToolGuy a) Can the brand successfully offer more vehicles that are affordable to more consumers? Yes if they decide to, for two reasons: a1) If and when they introduce the 'Model 2'/'Redwood'/whatever (or other 'low-cost' model or models) -- my understanding is they had valid reasons for waiting. a2) Tesla has gotten good at efficiency/cost reduction and passing (some of) the savings along. ¶ b) Would you be interested in a more affordable Tesla? b1) Yes, maybe, eventually but in the near term 'more affordable' Teslas should tend to make -all- used Teslas more affordable and this interests me more because I sort of kind of have my eye on a nice Model S one of these years. (Have never driven one, don't spoil the ending for me if you hate it.)
  • Aja8888 Notice no photos with the top down. They break...a lot on the Eos. And parts are unobtanium (besides no one wanting to work on the complicated flogging top).
Next