QOTD: Is This Something We Should… Aspire To?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There was an odd bit of PR posted to Ford’s media site this week — something that’s not altogether surprising, given the current socio-economic climate. You know about vans, right? Thought so. While the Econoline van is gone and the Windstar/Freestar a distant memory, Ford still has two boxes on wheels ready for the taking.

How’d you like to live in one?

Ford’s story concerns women who live in their vans — in most cases, as a temporary hotel room while on the road, but in another case as a full-time thing. Yes, that Transit or Transit Connect can be your log cabin in the woods if you so choose. Just be ready with that thermal foil and drill, but be aware that modifications might void your warranty.

The message seems to be that empowerment, freedom, and rent-free (but not necessarily payment-free) living awaits. Of this, we have no doubt. Who doesn’t want to go camping with a large van? If you’re like me, and have a fear of tents — land sharks (bears) lurk everywhere, you know — then the cargo floor of a spacious commercial van seems like a pretty nice place to spend the night. On holiday? Think of the money you could save by choosing the Walmart parking lot over a suite overlooking the ocean. Hell, you might make friends with the owners of the RVs parked there.

But to live in a Transit Connect? To spend your life seeking safe spots to park at night while showering at the YWCA in the morning? (“You get used to picking the right spots, and you just rely on common sense,” says van dweller Tasha Rivard). Is that really the life we should aspire to, or even promote? Sure, if you’re the artsy, creative, connected type who wants to go where the wind takes you while a string of paying clients remains just an email away, have at it. If a city or job beckons you to put down roots, the rental listings await. Far be it for me to tell a woman (or man) what to do.

I’m just not sure if an automaker can expect much of a draw from this would-be customer base. Certainly, if you’re living the stereotypical nomad life, that van probably left its warranty coverage behind during the Clinton administration. It’ll be held together with chewing gum and paper clips.

This type of is a little more extreme than the vanning craze that spawned the vehicles you see here. It was expected that the cool guys driving these rigs owned or rented some sort of residence when they weren’t relaxing at the beach or drinking Miller and seeking out unwanted pregnancies outside the KISS concert.

So, tell me, B&B — am I overthinking this? Should automakers be allowed to promote their vehicles as rolling abodes free of guilt? And: have you ever felt the urge to live the van life yourself?

[Images: Steph Willems/TTAC, Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 37 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Jul 19, 2018

    Ford is actually advocating an illegal act. It's not lawful to be homeless, or a full-time RV'er, especially if you have funds to pay the fines. If you're homeless, live on dirt and broke, no one cares enforce US laws on you. Paying your rent/mortgage/utilities and otherwise "keeping a home" even if that's most of your bring-home pay, helps keep the US afloat and the wheels turning. It's also illegal to be "off grid". In fact, I don't know of any US state that establishes driver's licenses or IDs without 2 month's utility bills in your name.

    • See 1 previous
    • Sub-600 Sub-600 on Jul 20, 2018

      @Scoutdude I rent and utilities are included, I haven’t had a utility bill in 10 years.

  • Pwrwrench Pwrwrench on Jul 20, 2018

    I lived in what was later called a "Mini-van" for about 6 months almost 50 years ago. I was "between jobs" and did not have enough money from previous employment to pay first/last/deposit on an apartment. You learn how to do things differently in that situation. Of course this was long before the term "molester van" or the sticker "Don't Laugh, Your Daughter Might Be Inside". It was a lot easier to find a place to park for the night then. Less competition and fewer security guards. Years later when I got a van with built in camping stuff, beds, cabinets, water tank, sink, etc, it was easier to go on trips of up to two weeks. You learn where you can find showers for free or cheap (often in State Parks) and other tricks of the road. I don't think I'll have to do that again, but if necessary I know I can.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next