2019 Hyundai Tucson Gets Mild Hybrid Power, Remains Just Out of Reach

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Those Europeans seem like a scared lot. Always trying to appease their domineering rulers’ demands for greener cars, all thanks to strict mandates handed down from the central powers in Belgium.

While we’re hardly that different over here (minus that whole “union of member states” thing), Europe’s push for fuel efficiency generates technological ripples that reach this side of the Atlantic. Eventually, anyway. For the 2019 model year, European customers gain a 48-volt mild hybrid option for the refreshed Hyundai Tucson, heralding a similar setup that’s expected to land in American showrooms before too long.

Right now, Hyundai’s letting its European division handle all of this mild hybrid stuff, as it’s initially only destined for diesel powerplants. That probably won’t remain the case, as the automaker plans to develop gasoline mild hybrids with far greater market appeal.

Everything’s on the table when it comes to Hyundai’s plan to conquer America… again. There’s a 2.2-liter diesel coming to the redesigned Santa Fe. The subcompact Kona’s getting an all-electric variant. Already, there’s three flavors of electrification available in the Ioniq line, and the Sonata lets you handle its plug, too. With an onslaught of new crossovers on the way, the need to boost the entire fleet’s gas mileage makes a 48-volt system an attractive option for some models. Jeep’s already going this route.

At the very least, it’s an option Hyundai could pull out of its toolbox.

Hyundai said the mild hybrid 2.0-liter diesel four-cylinder bound for the Euro-spec 2019 Tucson gains a 16 horsepower boost from its belt starter generator system, which draws power from a 0.44 kWh battery. Regenerative coasting and braking recharges the lithium-ion unit. Just recently, Kia debuted a diesel mild hybrid system bound for the European-market Sportage, though that system offers slightly less grunt under hard acceleration.

The goal for Hyundai’s engineers is to boost fuel economy by 7 percent in vehicles using the system.

[Image: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Bd2 Bd2 on Jun 06, 2018

    Making the 48V system the default across its line-up is a no-brainer. Not only does it help increase fuel economy/reduce CO2 emissions at a manageable cost, a larger battery is needed these days due to drain from all the latest tech. Not really feeling the subtle changes to the sheetmetal. The headlight/taillight treatment is a step back, as is the shape of the grille with that slight curvature at the lower sides; don't exactly like the modified Hyundai hexagonal grille shape, but it works better w/ the design language of the new Santa Fe (so maybe will see an improvement w/ the next Tucson). The 48V system w/ Hyundai's new Theta III 2.5L engine (in turbo form) should be enough power for most (daily) drivers.

  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Jun 06, 2018

    Too bad the EU can't just take over the whole world and bring their social justice to all the rest of us. Step 1: tax the crap out of carbon based fuels and subsidize renewables so that consumers can enjoy energy poverty with $10 per gallon gasoline and 35 cent per Kwh electricity. Step 2: Mandate super tough fuel economy and emission regs that can only be met with micro-cars or expensive and/or unreliable technology that suck all the profits out of auto-manufacturing. Step 3: after paying high prices for cars and fuel, take 50+% of any remaining money consumers and industry has left to pay for: Step 4: the millions of 3rd world refugees with no marketable skills who sign up for the generous welfare state.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next