2018 Toyota Camry XLE - Jack of All Trades

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2018 Toyota Camry XLE

2.5-liter four-cylinder (203 horsepower @ 6,600 rpm; 184 lb-ft @ 5,000 rpm)
Eight-speed automatic, front-wheel drive
28 city / 39 highway / 32 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
8.5 city, 6.1 highway, 7.4 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$28,450 (U.S) / $35,090 (Canada)
As Tested
$34,388 (U.S.) / $36,962 (Canada)
Prices include $895 destination charge in the United States and $1,845 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.
2018 toyota camry xle jack of all trades

Complete the last part of the phrase in the headline up there. Yeah, it’s “master of none.” Thing is, that doesn’t apply to the 2018 Toyota Camry – it really is a jack of all trades, and it even masters at least some.

Fight it we might, but most automotive journalists, or at least most of us who grew up as enthusiasts, have biases. One of mine has been to rag on the Camry, dismissing it like so many others as a boring and beige (figuratively, not literally) commuter sleigh.

Toyota was listening, and every generation got a bit better, even if the driving dynamics part of the equation was still lacking compared to some of the competition.

Well, now that part is finally on par.

I spent more time with my Camry tester than I do with most – it was my ride to Detroit and back earlier this year for the auto show. So I got a lot of seat time, most of it spent on the freeway.

In years past, I’d have had mixed feelings about that – the old Camry was fine for freeway cruising but not really engaging in most other respects. That’s changed.

The keys handed to me belonged to an XLE-trim car with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder making 203 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque. That “power” gets to the front wheels via an eight-speed automatic transmission.

I put “power” in quotes because 184 lb-ft doesn’t sound like a lot of torque, especially not in comparison to the 267 provided by the available V6. But it got the job done both around town and while merging on the freeway.

Toyota engineers have finally figured out how to dial sportiness into the steering and suspension. Gone is the float of yore. Gone is steering that feels like it’s not even in the same area code as the tires. The steering is direct and has a nice heft. Meanwhile, Toyota hasn’t confused sporty with stiff – the Camry’s ride is far from soft, but it’s compliant enough to make a freeway slog comfortable.

All of this is done without sacrificing the elements that have kept Toyota cranking out Camrys in huge numbers over the years. It’s more fun to drive, but not only does it keep the ride on just the right side of comfy, it also continues to offer a spacious cabin, trunk space aplenty, plus fuel efficiency.

So, the Camry finally drives well enough that enthusiasts won’t shun it. It finally drives well enough to put it in the same conversation with the also all-new Honda Accord, the Mazda 6, and the soon-to-depart Ford Fusion when it comes to fun-to-drive factor. Huzzah! Great! There must be some flaws somewhere, though, right? Nothing in life is perfect, after all.

Yeah, there are flaws. None fatal, but I found plenty to be annoyed by. That’s not to pick on Toyota – it’s literally part of my job.

Let’s start with the styling. I don’t find it ugly, but Toyota’s attempt to make the Camry look as sporty as it now feels means the car is a mish-mash of design cues. I like the wing-shaped logo/grille element, but the large and gaping maw that makes up the lower front grille gets uglier the more you look at it, and the weird lines on the front hood mar what could be a clean look.

Speaking of clean, the rear of the car is better looking because Toyota kept it simpler out back. If that same philosophy existed up front, the Camry could look even sleeker than it does.

Also annoying – a snowstorm completely flummoxed most of the various driver-assistance systems. Not surprising, perhaps, and likely not unique to the Camry – but it tells me our autonomous future isn’t quite here yet.

What bugged me the most, however, is the feature-to-cost ratio. The XLE is the second-highest trim available for non-hybrid models, and the window sticker is as notable for what isn’t there, as what is. Not only are the aforementioned driver’s aids optional as part of a package, but so too is the premium audio system. Furthermore, if you want factory nav, you need to get a V6 – with the four-cylinder, you get navigation via an app.

That would be all well and good if the price were lower. Sure, the average new-car transaction price is $33K and all that, so maybe this is me being the old man yelling at a cloud, but a $28,450 base and a $34K sticker for the driver’s aids, premium audio, panoramic roof/moonroof, and a few other accoutrements still strikes me as dear. Especially since a base XLE V6 is just a tick more (yes, I know – that gap will widen with options).

Let’s pause here and note that a top-trim Accord bases under $34K, although there is no more V6 in that car.

Fuel economy is a wallet-pleasing 28 mpg city/39 mpg highway/32 mpg combined, making the Camry a good road trip choice.

Which, for me, it was. It swallowed luggage easily, the seats never got uncomfortable, the steering tracked straight, the ride was never harsh, and I needed gas just once on a Chicago-Detroit round trip.

Camrys always sold well, even when they didn’t drive well. Now, in a bit of bad timing, the Camry finally drives well just as the market shifts to crossovers. Still, with the car able to do almost everything well, the Camry presents at least one exhibit in the case for midsize sedans.

[Images © 2108 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Join the conversation
4 of 69 comments
  • Akear Akear on May 14, 2018

    So this is the car that basically put Ford and Chrysler out of the passenger car business. Is it really that good?

    • See 1 previous
    • Akear Akear on May 15, 2018

      @ponchoman49 So the Fusion and 200 must be the burgers you get at the local high school cafeteria. Ford has set a new low. What a disgrace!

  • Elusivellama Elusivellama on May 30, 2018

    I could have sworn I read a review of a 2018 Camry SE rental, here on TTAC where it was derided as the second coming of the 2007 Camry. What gives? Did Toyota update the car between when the first article was written, and now?

  • Chiefmonkey Honda just cuts too many corners. There's no reason why the base Accord should have a 4 speaker stereo lol. It's a $28,000 midsize sedan, not a Mitsubishi Mirage! Not to diss the Mirage it's a great car for what it is. And what's up with Honda's obsession with the dullest most spartan looking black cloth or leather interiors? Literally every other automaker I can think of offers two, three, four possibilities. If I order even the top trim accord in the blue paint, I am limited to a black interior...why???? Strangely, if I order the white paint, the possibilities expand overwhelmingly to two: black, or dentist's office gray (which clashes with white.) There's zero rhyme or reason to it. Just a cheap, corner cutting company.
  • Dartman It was all a scam just to gin up some free publicity. It worked. Tassos go back to sleep; no ones on your lawn. Real ‘murricans prefer hot dogs to gyros.
  • ToolGuy I plan to install a sink in the crawl space soon. After that I plan to put washer and dryer hookups on my roof.
  • ToolGuy "That power team adds an electric supercharger"YES!
  • Cardave5150 UAW is acting all butt-hurt that their employers didn't "share the wealth" when they had massive profits. They conveniently forget that they have a CONTRACT with their employers, which was negotiated in good faith, and which the Remaining 3 are honoring, paying them exactly what they negotiated last time.