Musk Opens Up Over Model 3 Progress, Television Cameras Enter Fremont Facility

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Tesla Motors is months behind schedule. Despite promises that Model 3 production would be humming along by the end of last year, the automaker has found itself bogged down by all kinds of delays. In March, the company’s problems were exacerbated by a voluntarily recall on 123,000 Model S sedans and another high-profile crash involving its Autopilot system.

This has shaken investors’ previously unwavering faith in Tesla, and forced a significant dip in its overall share price. Last month, the company’s stock valuation took a hit that it’s just now starting to come back from. But Tesla CEO Elon Musk knows he cannot simply dazzle shareholders with new ideas and promises, and has been camping out at the factory in Fremont, California, to prove his resolve and engage in some on-sight troubleshooting.

While he has mentioned his office sleeping-bag before, we actually got to see it in a recent interview he had with CBS This Morning host Gayle King — along with the rest of the factory. Musk invited CBS to come and see the plant and discuss Tesla’s current status, providing a rare glimpse of the facility. Normally, the automaker is incredibly strict in terms of who it allows inside and no network television crew has ever been able to film the assembly process.

Clearly tired, Musk remained humble throughout the interview. “I’m definitely under stress, so if I seem like I’m not under stress then I’m gonna be clear, I’m definitely under stress,” Musk told King. When asked if he knew all of what “production hell” would entail when he playfully made the claim last year, Musk responded with, “No. It’s worse than I thought.”

“We got complacent about some things that we felt were our core technology. We put too much technology into the Model 3 all at once. This should have been staged,” he said before going on to blame the factory’s automated assembly line for some of the production holdups. “We had this crazy, complex network of conveyor belts and it was not working, so we got rid of that whole thing.”

Musk has placed himself personally in charge of the line’s duties since the start of April and says he has been sleeping in the factory somewhat regularly. It’s his belief that the extra effort has paid off. Production still hasn’t hit the 2,500 unit per week benchmark yet but Elon believes it’s on track to meet that goal again.

“We were able to unlock some of the critical things that were holding us back from reaching 2,000 cars a week. But since then, we’ve continued to do 2,000 cars a week,” he said. “We’ll probably have, I don’t know, a three or four-fold increase in Model 3 output in the second quarter.”

When questioned about the April Fool’s joke that got him into hot water with worried investors and media outlets, he suggested everyone should lighten up. “It should be pretty obvious, I think, that I’m not going to joke about bankruptcy if I think it’s remotely real,” Musk said.

[Image: Maurizio Pesce/ Flickr ( CC BY 2.0)]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 39 comments
  • Incautious Incautious on Apr 16, 2018

    Bloomberg reports builds not sales, and that is an approximation. Over the last 5 months which is how long the 3 has been for sale, there were just over 4000 sales reported by good car bad car. Over that same 5 month period there were about 16,000 volt/bolt sales. Total bolt/volt sales over 13 months is about 50,000 sales which no doubt some are conquest sales of the 3. Still Tesla 3 is ramping up and the 2600 or so built this week will be sales in short order.Still with the $7500 tax credit expiring in July and other manufacturers offering their own alternatives is going to be a tough road for Musk and Co.

  • ABC-2000 ABC-2000 on Apr 16, 2018

    Can we stop calling this model 3 "affordable"? Consumer Reports just bought one for 59K !

    • See 1 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Apr 16, 2018

      $59k with the Autopilot option, certainly. To be fair, though, the cheapest one you can get right now is $49k. $59k represents the high end of Model 3 pricing, just as I can get a Camry for 40-something. On the other hand, the average transaction price for pickups - the best-selling vehicle in the US, is north of $40k, and cars are mid-30s. "Affordable" is certainly in the eye of the beholder, but statistically-speaking, the Model 3 is not affordable.

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next