Hilarious: Canadians Can't Even Buy a Focus Active Under Ford's New Plan

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

For a country that looks at its southern neighbor’s gasoline prices with lust and envy, you’d think small cars would make up a greater share of the vehicle mix. Well, they don’t. Canadians like their crossovers, pickups, and SUVs even more than Americans, and Ford’s future product lineup shows it.

It seems like just yesterday you could walk into a Ford dealer and check out a stingy and unsafe Aspire, before the hungry salesman upsold you on an Escort (or perhaps its sporty ZX2 sibling). Then there was the Contour, Taurus, and Crown Victoria to consider.

Those days are gone, and under Ford’s new truck-centric product plan, which ditches the Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, and Taurus, Canada won’t even get the crossover-ized Focus Active hatch. It’s a Mustang or nothing for small car lovers.

Apparently, we’ve made our bed and now need to lie in it.

News of this change comes by way of Autofocus, which quotes Ford Canada communications manager Christine Hollander as saying Canadians just don’t buy enough cars to warrant the model’s introduction.

“The car segment in Canada has been declining steadily since 2012 and now makes up just 33 percent of the overall market,” Hollander said. “Going in the other direction, SUV and crossover sales have been growing steadily since 2012 and now account for about 44 percent of all vehicle sales in Canada. And that trend of car sales declining as more consumers choose SUVs is expected to continue. So, we are focusing our efforts on vehicles customers prefer.”

It’s your fault, Greg in Moncton, and yours too, Crystal in Trois-Rivières. The only passenger car to crack the top 10 in monthly sales volume in Canada is the Honda Civic, positioned far below the best-selling Ford F-150. The best-selling Ford car last month was the Focus — in 39th place, according to GoodCarBadCar.

Canadians apparently prefer compact offerings from Toyota, Nissan, Mazda, Honda, Kia, Subaru, Chevrolet, and Volkswagen before they turn to the Blue Oval for a small car. As for the Fusion, which disappears south of the border, too, the BMW 3 Series is more popular in the Great White North. Hell, the Canadian-market Nissan Micra moved more metal last month. It’s a grim country for cars.

My neighbor already owns an EcoSport.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 72 comments
  • Macmcmacmac Macmcmacmac on Apr 29, 2018

    I wish (affordable) small cars didn't all have such insipid engine choices.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 29, 2018

    @mikey--What you have said about affordable housing is true. It is hard for many especially younger people starting out to own their own home and pay off student debts. It is hard to be interested in the latest and greatest car or truck if you are barely getting by financially. I don't believe it is fair to blame unions for all of the problems with the auto industry. Over paid executives and focus on short-term profitability at the expense of long term sustainability. Also most vehicles do not have the whoa factor in that the vehicle is so attractive and desirable that you just have to have it. True today's vehicles are safer, cleaner, more efficient, and overall more reliable but many have the appeal of a toaster especially with the choice of colors both exterior and interior wise. Additionally many new vehicles are bought by older buyers which include me. Again this gets back to what I stated previously about younger peoples ability to afford new vehicles. Its not that many younger people don't want to its that they have other financial obligations.

  • 28-Cars-Later “1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries....It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences”― Theodore J. Kaczynski, Ph.D., Industrial Society and Its Future, 1995.
  • FreedMike "Automotive connectivity has clearly been a net negative for the end user..."Really? Here's a list of all the net negatives for me:1) Instead of lugging around a road atlas or smaller maps that do nothing but distract me from driving, and don't tell me where to go once I've reached Point B, I can now just ask my car's navigation system to navigate me there. It'll even tell me how long it will take given current traffic conditions. 2) Instead of lugging around a box of a dozen or so cassette tapes that do nothing but distract me from driving, I can now just punch up a virtually endless library of music, podcasts, or audiobooks on the screen, push a button, and play them. 3) I can tell my car, "call (insert name here)" and the call is made without taking my hands off the wheel.4) I can tell my car, "text (insert name here)" and the system takes my dictation, sends me the text, and reads off any replies. 5) I can order up food on my screen, show up at the restaurant, and they'll have it waiting for me. 6) I can pull up a weather map that allows me to see things like hailstorms in my path. 7) If I'm in trouble, I can push a "SOS" button and help will be sent. 8) Using my phone, I can locate my car on a map and navigate to it on foot, and tell it to turn on the heat, A/C, or defrosters.None of these are benefits? Sorry, not sorry...I like them all. Why wouldn't I? Consumers clearly also like this stuff, and if they didn't, none of it would be included in cars. Now, maybe Matt doesn't find these to be beneficial. Fair enough! But he should not declare these things as a "net negative" for the rest of us. That's presumption. So...given all that, what's the answer here? Matt seems to think the answer is to "unplug" and go back to paper maps, boxes of music, and all that. Again, if that's Matt's bag, then fair enough. I mean, I've been there, and honestly, I don't want to go back, but if that's his bag, then go with God, I guess. But this isn't the solution for everyone, and saying otherwise is presumption. Here's a solution that DOES work for everyone: instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, clean the bathwater. You do that very, very simply: require clear, easy-to-understand disclosure of data sharing that happens as the result of all these connected services, and an equally clear, easy-to-understand method for opting out of said data sharing. That works better than turning the clock back to those thrilling days of 1990 when you had to refer to handwritten notes to get you to your date's house, or ripping SIM cards out of your car.
  • Funky D What is the over-under for number of recalls in the first 5 years of ownership?
  • Normie Dayyum! Great White Woman!The car, I mean. I could feel kinda safe in it.
  • Slavuta "The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. " --- 1984
Next