Appeals Court Says Trump Cannot Delay CAFE Penalties

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

During the Trump administration’s year-long quest to roll back Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) targets, it attempted to give automakers in violation of the current standards a break by delaying the scheduled increase of penalties. The logic here is that the federal government is reassessing the Obama era standards, so it lumped in the new fines that were supposed to go into effect last July.

Those penalties represent an increase of $8.50 for every tenth of a mile per gallon a new car consumes above the minimum fuel standard. But with the new targets in quasi limbo, the updated fines were not being applied.

On Monday, a federal appeals court ruled the Department of Transportation cannot do that. Since the old rules are technically still in effect, the court ruled that automakers are still subject to the fine.

Plaintiffs included the State of New York, California, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Vermont — as well as the Sierra Club, National Resources Defense Council, and the Center for Biological Diversity. Those groups collectively filed a lawsuit against the Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, NHTSA acting Deputy Administrator Jack Danielson, and Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao.

“Americans will breathe easier because the court undid the Trump administration’s bizarre attempt to encourage toxic tailpipe pollution,” said Vera Pardee, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, in a press release following the court ruling. “Cheap fines incentivize automakers to produce gas-guzzlers that fuel climate change and spew harmful pollutants. Reinstating proper penalties will help protect our kids’ lungs and our planet’s future.”

A blog post from the National Resources Defense Council claimed the court’s decision restored what it considered the proper fines. “The updated penalty impels automakers to clean up their fleets, rather than offering them a cheap license to burn more gas if they fail to keep pace with fuel economy targets,” said the council’s Clean Energy Attorney, Irene Gutierrez.

Meanwhile, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said the administration will continue to progress toward “more appropriate” fuel economy standards for the automotive industry. The new targets have not yet been set.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 51 comments
  • X-defector X-defector on Apr 24, 2018

    For those who don't believe, or simply aren't sure, whether the new CAFE standard were an earnest attempt at controlling fossil fuel dependence and pollution, or merely a power play by the ubiquitous and iron-fisted federal government, I'll just leave this right here..... https://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/features/emissions-test-car-vs-truck-vs-leaf-blower.html And of course this is to say nothing of motorcycles, scooters, and other two-wheeled motorized transport which are everywhere yet require no emissions controls whatsoever.

    • Charliej Charliej on Apr 24, 2018

      Too bad that you are not a biker. You would know that bikes do have catalytic converters now. Motorcycle emission control first started in 1978. There is a long history of emission control in motorcycles.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 24, 2018

    Coal Rollers should have their vehicles confiscated and destroyed.

    • Dynasty Dynasty on Apr 24, 2018

      So what you're saying is if someone rolls the coal, they should pay the toll?

  • Mike Beranek Fast cars certainly do separate the men from the boys, and that's what happened here.
  • Redapple2 The answer to a question I didnt ask.
  • Mike Beranek He needs that 20 grand to get a psychiatrist to cure him of being crazy enough to ask 20 grand for this car.
  • MaintenanceCosts Also, I'm pretty sure those wheels were from a 929.
  • ScarecrowRepair I remember when the Gen 2 turbos came out and I was worried my '86 might not last and I should look at the replacements. Not as much fun, and the dealer was an absolute jerk, wouldn't let me do anything but drive around the block. I ended up finally giving it away at 533,000 miles and 29 years when the second engine (first lasted 473,000) blew its head gasket and the connecting rod bearings started knocking. Someone's using it for parts now, and I miss it all the time.
Next