Tesla Stock Price Dives After Moody's Downgrades Credit Rating Over Model 3 Delays, Liquidity Concerns

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

Tesla has been Wall Street’s fair-haired boy as the electric car startup’s share price soared over the past few years. Production figures have not kept pace with Tesla’s market cap, and now problems getting assembly up to speed on the company’s vitally important Model 3 and concerns about its cash burn have resulted in a downgrade of its credit rating from Moody’s Investor Service. That report from Moody’s was issued late on Tuesday.

When trading began on Wednesday morning, Tesla stock opened at $264.76, down 5 percent from the day before. That is almost 14 percent lower than it was at the beginning of the week, and 31 percent lower than in September of 2017, when Tesla’s stock price apparently peaked at $385 a share.

Tesla’s overall credit rating was dropped from B2 to B3, which is six grades below investment level, and Moody’s said its outlook on the company is “negative.” Moody’s analyst Bruce Clark said, “Tesla’s ratings reflect the significant shortfall in the production rate of the company’s Model 3 electric vehicle. The company also faces liquidity pressures due to its large negative free cash flow and the pending maturities.”

Moody’s report went on to say, “Tesla’s ratings reflect the significant shortfall in the production rate of the company’s Model 3 electric vehicle. Tesla’s rating could be lowered further if there are shortfalls from its updated Model 3 production targets.”

The $1.8 billion in senior unsecured bonds that Tesla issued in August 2017 were downgraded by Moody’s from B3 to Caa1, well into junk bond territory — what the firm considers “very high credit risk, poor standing.” That resulted in a drop Tuesday evening of 3.5 cents on the dollar to 89 cents. At the time that debt was issued, demand was strong enough that Tesla only offered 5.3 percent interest, a record low for Tesla bonds. Now investors seem to be turning away from the EV startup.

The automaker continues to miss production level targets. Bloomberg estimates Tesla is now building about a thousand cars a week after saying that it would hit 2,500 units weekly by this time, the end of the first quarter of 2018. Tesla head Elon Musk predicted Model 3 production would hit 5,000 vehicles a week sometime this year.

In addition to failing to meet production goals, Moody’s said Tesla is facing financial hurdles. The credit rating agency claims the automaker will have to soon “undertake a large, near-term capital raise in order to refund maturing obligations and avoid a liquidity short-fall.” More than $2 billion will reportedly have to be raised by Tesla to meet those needs. The bonds in question mature in 2025.

Moody’s pessimism was echoed by Hitin Anand, senior analyst at CreditSights. “Why would anybody buy the bonds? There is just no reason to buy the bonds. You’re taking up equity-like risk and all you’re getting is a 5.3 percent coupon.”

Anand said that Tesla could possibly seek secured loans or issue notes convertible to equity in order to meet cash needs.

Tesla critics’ bleak forecast was countered by venture capitalist Jason Calacanis, who owns shares in the company (as well as a Model 3 he somewhat contradictorily claims to daily drive in self-driving mode). “Tesla is going to come roaring back,” Calacanis told CNBC. “Everyone who loves Tesla products can’t shut up about them because they are the greatest cars on the road.”

Greatest cars on the road or not, if Tesla cannot get production of the Model 3 up to anticipated levels, you can expect its credit rating and stock price to drop further.

[Image: Bloomberg]

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • Rich Fitzwell Rich Fitzwell on Mar 28, 2018

    The usually useless SEC may have sent a message to Elon Musk last week with the news they are going after Elizabeth Holmes of Theronos for "massive fraud"

  • Tstag Tstag on Mar 29, 2018

    Tesla investors should be worried. The competition is coming thick and fast. Jaguar are now attacking the Model X and the new electric XJ will go after the Model S. Tesla can trade off it’s Apple like status for a while yet but big boys are coming and will have them for lunch. Jaguar have already sold 20,000 I paces to one company. Soon they will really enter the publics mind and because the IPace is cheaper and better looking than the model X and let’s face it probably even more reliable I can’t help but wonder how long Tesla’s got to make a profit.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next