Self-driving Company Waymo to Buy Thousands of High-end, Sporty Jaguar EVs for Taxi Service

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Let’s hope future robo-taxi passengers appreciate a sport-tuned suspension and crisp driving dynamics, because there’s a slim chance they’ll notice it when shuttling around in a driverless Jaguar.

On Tuesday, Waymo, autonomous car unit of Google, announced its intent to purchase up to 20,000 Jaguar I-Pace electric crossovers for its future fleet of AV EVs. Fitted with an array of self-driving hardware and software, Waymo says the cars will hit the road in 2020. Testing begins this year, which has us wondering what kind of wait a regular I-Pace customer faces.

News of this bulk buy comes two months after Waymo’s decision to purchase “thousands” of hybrid Chrysler Pacifica minivans for its autonomous ride-hailing fleet. Fiat Chrysler and Waymo entered into an agreement long ago (in AV terms), with testing now ongoing on public roads in numerous cities. Phoenix, Arizona is the site of the company’s Early Rider test program, in which the public can summon and ride in a driverless Pacifica.

Later this year, Phoenix will serve as the launch site for the company’s commercial ride-hailing service, featuring completely driver-free cab rides for paying customers. Phoenix, of course, is a market that’s very unlikely to see snow or rain obscure road boundaries, painted markers, street signs, and the like.

So far, Waymo hasn’t seen a tragedy like that experienced by Uber last week, and, ulike Uber, the company has voluntarily submitted information to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to document its progress.

The deal between Waymo and Jaguar, which carries an undisclosed price (it’s estimated at $1 billion or more — the I-Pace’s profit margin is unknown and Jag won’t want to take a hit), will see the two companies collaborate on the vehicle’s production at the factory level. Self-driving I-Pace models will roll out of the assembly plant with everything needed to enter driverless taxi duty, rather than seeing them shipped to Waymo for outfitting. The two companies claim up to 20,000 of the specialized I-Paces will be built in the first two years of production.

The Jaguar I-Pace, which starts at $69,500 (USD), boasts approximately 240 miles of range from its 90 kWh battery pack. Two electric motors positioned front and rear combine for an output of 394 horsepower and 512 lb-ft of torque — more than enough motivation for sedate, follow-the-rules taxi service. It seem like overkill, given the car’s intended use, but Waymo has global domination in mind here. Jaguar not only has the brand recognition, but also the cash, suppliers, and facility to churn out I-Paces at a reliable clip.

Orders for retail customers began earlier this month, and the first I-Paces should enter driveways by the middle of this year.

[Images: Waymo, Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 11 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Mar 27, 2018

    You’ve got to give Jaguar some credit here. They look like a modern and innovative car maker yet have a tremendous sporting pedigree. BMW and co look soooo last year!

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Mar 27, 2018

    So Jaguar I-pace is a new Town Car now? The reason Google chose Jaguar is that is is reliable, very durable and cheap to repair.

    • Tstag Tstag on Mar 28, 2018

      Correct. Jaguar simply showed Google how reliable their cars aren’t versus Teslas and Google quickly realised that the best electrical car in the world is a Jaguar

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next