By on March 20, 2018

GM Cruise AV roofrack

General Motors has announced it will begin manufacturing autonomous vehicles by 2019. Since purchasing Cruise Automation in 2016, GM has invested heavily into self-driving cars. However, its Chevrolet Bolt-based Cruise AV has only served as a testbed for the technology. That will change next year when the Orion Township assembly plant in Michigan starts building examples for commercial use.

If so, that would make General Motors the first company to sell an autonomous vehicle. However, it’s not entirely clear if that’s the ultimate goal. Thus far, GM has only said the autos will enter into a “ride-sharing environment” where the vehicles can be managed in a fleet — perhaps something akin to Uber.

Obviously, the analogy is as accurate as it is unfortunate. Uber recently suspended autonomous testing after one of its vehicles fatally struck a pedestrian earlier this week. While GM’s product planning can hardly be faulted for the goings-on at another company, the collision could see the general public wonder if production Cruise AVs are ready to take over the road.

“We’re continuing to make great progress on our plans to commercialize in 2019,” said GM President Dan Ammann in a statement. “Our Orion and Brownstown teams have proven experience in building high-quality self-driving test vehicles and battery packs, so they are well-prepared to produce the Cruise AV.”

The company has already built over 200 test examples of the model and over $100 million will be invested into the plants to prepare them for autonomous assembly. General Motors hasn’t stated any production goals but noted it’s already building the rooftop modules that house sensor arrays essential for operations.

Brownstone will continue handling the sensor modules and battery assembly as Orion gets a dedicated production line for the autonomous cars. Assembly of the Chevrolet Bolt and Sonic will continue at the site, as well.

GM has showcased its Cruise AV without a steering wheel in the past, generating some light criticism for its underperformance in real world environments. The vehicle seemed to have difficulty navigating construction-laden areas. Still, most agree GM’s autonomous tech is among the best currently in existence — roughly on par with Waymo, which is the only company currently running self-driving vehicles with passengers and no driver.

GM previously petitioned the Department of Transportation for permission to operate cars with no human driver and no manual controls on public roads. For now, current Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards specifically call for manual controls. General Motors says if it does not receive the special dispensations on controls, its vehicles will still meet existing standards.

Meanwhile, the AV Start Act, crafted to help push through these changes, is currently being held up by a handful of concerned senators. Their primary concerns involve data protection, privacy, establishing what defines an autonomous vehicle, and ensuring any mechanical exemptions made for self-driving cars does not jeopardize public safety. If the bill passes, automakers would be able to test them with fewer regulations and market them directly to customers before updated federal safety regulations can be established. It would also prohibit individual states from adopting their own rules on autonomous vehicles.

[Image: General Motors]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

16 Comments on “GM Claims It Will Start Manufacturing Autonomous Cars Next Year...”

  • avatar

    They can’t foist this technology on the test subjects, er, I mean public, fast enough.

  • avatar

    Amazing timing of this announcement. Didn’t one of these things go all Skynet yesterday and kill a person?

  • avatar

    General Murders?

  • avatar

    … Or not, considering Sunday night’s accident. I’ve been trying to say Lidar and radar are not enough; Sunday proved it. No matter who was at fault, the AV system should have recognized the potential and at least steered somewhat away from it. Lidar simply doesn’t scan quickly enough to generate an effective picture and radar saw right through her and the bike.

    • 0 avatar

      Vulpine: Exactly! In addition to what you’ve said, there are these issues:

  • avatar

    Not only do I not want an autonomous vehicle from GM, I do not want these things anywhere near me…or my family.

    There needs to be the potential for criminal charges, in addition to civil liability, for these things.

  • avatar

    GM would be crazy to allow its autonomous tech in the wild outside of interstate highways.

    The tech will be perfected some day. Just not next year.

  • avatar

    DEATH RACE 2019!

  • avatar

    WHO exactly is pushing for the rapid development of this tech!? Consumers aren’t demanding the tech, why the rush? Why is it needed in the first place?

    • 0 avatar

      Taxi fleet operators are the ones that want it, and I expect that delivery services are very interested as well. Imagine how much more efficient a FedEx truck could be if the human could focus only on the packages while leaving the driving to the system.

    • 0 avatar

      It’s super-important to save money *cough* er, I mean lives.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    What a rich, untapped vein of law we’re about to mine.

    I guess GM doesn’t read the headlines.

  • avatar

    So, looking at those sensors and living in the upper Midwest I wonder how they keep those sensors clear when driving during heavy snow or freezing rain? How long does the car have to warm up after sitting in the parking lot in said conditions to clear them enough to even start driving? Do they have electric heating elements in them? Does snow or ice accumulation have any effect on them?

    Sorry, I have always wondered about that.

    • 0 avatar

      Radar would be marginally affected… at least until it melts the snow off (it is microwaves, after all.) Sonics might have a problem since they’re ultrasonic and as such don’t create much effective vibration to clear themselves. Cameras? Nope… hand cleared unless your wipers pass in front of the lens.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • mcs: @Garak: It would also be good for search and rescue. In a search, with a gas model, the noise could drown out...
  • Garak: I could see quite a few places where you’d might want an electric model. Countries with expensive gas,...
  • DungBeetle62: Don’t know whose apple my Dad polished but in the early 80s after a parade of awful Cutlasses...
  • JD-Shifty: lowest gas prices were under Clinton. But that’s none of my business. We’ve seen wild price...
  • Buickman: anyone notice AutoNews has eliminated their comment section?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber