Infiniti Wasn't Fibbing When It Estimated the Revolutionary QX50 Engine's Thirst

infiniti wasnt fibbing when it estimated the revolutionary qx50 engines thirst

One thing is clear — with variable compression comes a newfound lack of thirst.

Infiniti’s previous midsize QX50 crossover didn’t astound in its thrift, garnering 20 miles per gallon on the EPA combined cycle. The move to a new, front-drive platform and addition of a years-in-the-making gasoline engine for 2019 has done wonders for the model’s drinking habit, however, and Infiniti engineers pegged the MPG figures right on the nose.

With the 2019 QX50‘s fuel economy now confirmed by the EPA, it begs the question: just how much of the model’s thriftiness can the variable compression engine take credit for?

By adopting a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder with revolutionary internals, the front-drive 2019 QX50 delivers 27 mpg combined, 24 in the city, and 31 on the highway. Shave off 1 mpg from the highway and combined figures for the all-wheel-drive model.

This is exactly the estimated 35 percent (FWD) and 30 percent (AWD) increase in fuel economy touted by Infiniti reps at a recent first drive event. Last year, chief powertrain engineer Shinichi Kiga said the VC-T engine would help the new QX50 top the old one by 27 percent on the combined cycle.

To put the mileage into perspective, Acura’s MDX Sport Hybrid, available only in AWD, rates 27 mpg on the combined cycle. But the Infiniti, devoid of any pricey electrical trappings, beats it by 3 mpg on the highway.

It would be interesting — and informative — to see an engine swap performed on an existing model, with no other changes. That’s because, for 2019, the QX50 donned more than just a new skin and beating heart. Its engine went from a 3.7-liter naturally aspirated V6 to a turbocharged four-banger designed to make up for the lost displacement with varying piston reach. Horsepower shrunk from 325 to 268, with torque seeing a boost from 267 to 280 lb-ft.

While engineers shaved some weight from the new model, the lost heft didn’t amount to more than 100 pounds. The previous seven-speed automatic transmission also disappeared in favor of a continually variable unit programmed with economy in mind. It’s no secret CVTs are the go-to ‘box for ultra-thrifty models, but combined MPG gains well into the double digits are not something you’ll attain with a simple tranny swap.

In the absence of significant lightweighting, the new engine looks to be the main culprit. It’s certainly a win for Infiniti engineers and the brand itself, but it remains to be seen if the new engine (and styling) helps win the QX50 more fans than the previous-generation model, which never became a huge player in the all-important premium crossover segment.

As for reliability, we can only trust Infiniti did its homework there, too.

[Images: Infiniti]

Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Saturnotaku Saturnotaku on Feb 15, 2018

    The MDX hybrid is geared toward performance over outright fuel economy. It's also bigger and heavier. The Lexus RX 450h is closer and rates 30 mpg combined.

  • MyerShift MyerShift on Jul 30, 2018

    Nightmare engine guts, unproven durability plus CVT? Nissan?! The only way for that combination to be worse is substitute "Nissan" with something German. A neat experiment, but I feel long term reliability is questionable.

  • Tane94 are both eligible for federal tax credits? That's the big $7,500 question.
  • Jkross22 Toenail says what?
  • MaintenanceCosts This sounds like old-school GM drama!
  • SCE to AUX It's not really a total re-badge since some of the body parts are unique, and the interiors are quite different.As I mentioned the other day, the Tonale has a terrible name and a dim future.As for the Alfa team - guess what, this is how corporate ownership works. You are part of Stellantis partly because you're not viable as a standalone business, and then your overlords decide what's shared among the products.By the way: That Uconnect infotainment system found in Alfas was originally a Chrysler product... you're welcome.
  • Kurkosdr Someone should tell the Alfa Romeo people that they are a badge owned by a French company now.The main reason PSA bought FiatChrysler is that PSA has the technology to enter the luxury market but customers don't want a French luxury car for psychological/mindshare reasons. FiatChrysler has the opposite problem: they have lots of still-respected brands but not always the technology to make good cars. Not to say that if FCA has a good platform, it won't be used in a PSA car.In other words, if those Alfa Romeo buds think that they will remain a silo with their own bespoke platforms and exclusive sheet metal, they are in for a shock. This is just the start.