Buy/Drive/Burn: A Luxury All-Wheel Drive Wagon Awaits

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Our previous entry into Buy/Drive/Burn asked which brougham personal luxury coupe you’d choose from the Big Three for the 1980 model year. Today we’ve got a different Big Three — two Germans and a Swede. (Read ground rules here.)

All of them offered luxury wagons with all-wheel drive around the turn of the century, and we hone in on 2004 today. Which one will you drive up to the Alps and then set on fire?


Audi A6 Allroad

Before the CUV craze started, Audi applied some cladding to its A6 Avant, jacked up the suspension, and increased the price to create the A6 Allroad for 1999. Available with either a 2.7-liter biturbo engine or the full-fat 4.2-liter V8 (an excellent engine), the Allroad sold in relatively low numbers in North America until it was cancelled after the 2005 model year.

Volvo XC70

Much like the Audi, Volvo added cladding and ride height to the all-wheel drive potion to create the rough and ready XC70. First available for 1998, the V70 XC (or Cross Country), name swapped to XC70 in 2003, midway through the second generation. No inline-six in 2004; we had a 2.5-liter I5. The XC70 received a third generation, surviving through 2015 before its replacement by the larger (and elegant) V90 Cross Country.

Mercedes-Benz E320 4MATIC

For the more traditional, cladding-free luxury customer, Mercedes-Benz held onto a traditional wagon format (and still does), while offering its 4Matic system to power all four wheels. Brand new in 2004 (the DaimlerChrysler era), the W211 E320 wagon sported revised but conservative styling that was similar to its predecessor. It’s powered by the standard 3.2-liter V6, because this was a time when the numbers on the back matched the engine’s displacement.

Three different wagons providing the same sort of luxury experience and maintenance opportunities. Which one goes home with you as you speed away from an arson event?

[Images: The Truth About Cars, Audi, Volvo Cars, Daimler AG]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Kmars2009 Kmars2009 on Feb 09, 2018

    If we're going to be criticizing Volvo, let's get the facts straight. The 1st gen XC was on the old 850, then renamed V70XC in 1998. The second P2 came out in 2001 and ran through 2007. It was renamed XC70 in 03 and given a 2.5T engine. All previous models had the 2.4T engine. The last gen was enlarged in 08 and carried on until 17. It now had a 3.2 6cyl in it. I personally own a P2 2002 V70XC. It's been quite reliable, however, like any car...must be well maintained to go the distance. Mine has 218,000 on it and is still going strong. One major thing must be noted about these AWD cars. Multispeed transmissions must be servic regularly...as do the angle gears. Like every 40K miles on both...or u might as well burn it.... literally. Anyway, I love my volvo! As parts ware, I replace them. The body and interior are doing fine, even in the AZ sun. (Again...take care of the leather) I will drive it until it dies. I use synthetic oil and it runs like new...even the turbo is fine. I'd buy another Volvo in a heart beat!

  • B234R B234R on Feb 10, 2018

    Burn: Mercedes. Never liked how it drives, or the interior. Looks ok on the outside but that doesn't help much. Since in -04 it would be just before the M272 that has the balance shaft gear issues this might be the least expensive to run, but i've always been willing to pay more to actually like the car(s) i drive, particularly after trying the low-cost option a couple times and hating every minute of driving the pos kias.. So, the mercedes can burn or whatever, don't even really care. Buy: Volvo, mainly because of three things: lights, seats, even the crappier ones beat anything in a W211 and A6 apart from the recaros in the audi and the "sport" or whatever they were called are just a bit better the aforementioned recaros. This of course is a very personal thing what fits your behind might be completely the opposite. And the third is running costs, since i happen to know what to do to prevent and do if things go awry on one of these it would be cheap to own compared to the A6 and the Mercs cost don't matter.. Drive: Audi, this is the one i'd prefer driving, (with the right seats) but even though i work at an indie VAG specialist shop, i consider buying an old allroad with a 2,7T or 4,2 financial suicide.. Unlike the volvo, knowing what to do doesn't save the day here and while some things might not cost thousands when doing them yourself, it feels like most repairs start with removing the engine..

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next