QOTD: Do You Think Ford Will Ruin the New Bronco?

by Corey Lewis

Published: January 3rd, 2018

qotd do you think ford will ruin the new bronco

For 2019, Ford will debut a new Ranger (1982-2011), followed the next year by a new Bronco (1966-1996). While there have been some camouflaged Rangers seen running around, Ford is not showing anybody what the new Bronco will look like.

Since they’re leaving it up to our imaginations, do you think they’re going to ace the new Bronco, or drop a big deuce?

Let’s define what both outcomes mean:

Aces: The new Bronco will feature excellent, retro-modern heritage styling much like Ford managed with the new Mustang in 2005. Though it’s unique from a styling standpoint, the Bronco will share basic underpinnings with the global/North American Ranger to save on development costs. This is the option most enthusiasts are hoping for if they have any sense. The Bronco is once again a sales hit, and receives successive generation(s) with revised styling and core characteristics intact. The Bronco legacy continues, untarnished except for that one time in June of 1994.

Deuces: The new Bronco will feature slightly modified Ranger styling (ie. Ranger with bed cap), and will be too similar overall to be a real Bronco. Heritage of prior models will not be present, save for perhaps a few retro throwback badges here and there, or a plaque on the dashboard. Ford will pillage the Bronco name to make money, while expending the smallest possible amount of capital. It’s strip mining, but for cars. At the end of the first generation the Bronco is dropped, or reduced to a trim variant of the Ranger. Perhaps it is reincarnated as a Ford Mobility bicycle or an ECOSport later on.

Point for Deuce: While it’s all well and good to be mysterious about what the new Bronco will look like, the appearance of a Ranger in camo which is just about identical to the global Ranger (see above) does not bode well for the future Bronco. If Ford didn’t spend the money to change the Ranger before bringing it over, it’s doubtful they’d do so for an even more limited model like the Bronco.

Point for Ace: The reason Ford is being so secretive is because they know they have a hit on their hands, and it’s definitely not just a global Ranger with a cap on the back (which would look suitable in any street scene in Thailand). They’ve invested too much to reveal it early, and want to catch competitors like the Wrangler and Defender off guard with their brand new bucking Bronco.

Off to you B&B, which do you think is more likely to happen here?

[Images: Ford; TTAC]

#Ford #FordBronco #FordRanger #Jeep #JeepWrangler #LandRover #LandRoverDefender #NewCars #NewsBlog #ProductPlanning #QOTD #Trucks #QuestionOfTheDay #SUVs #UpcomingVehicles

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 81 comments

Skor on Jan 04, 2018

What I really want it that new Canyonero Can you name the truck with four wheel drive, smells like a steak and seats thirty-five.. Canyonero! Canyonero!

Like Reply
Vulpine on Jan 04, 2018

The FJ Cruiser was not a true retro FJ, it was a fully-enclosed, no removeable panel, SUV lacking any of the off-road 'sport' environment that the original had. It was big, chunky and inconvenient as a purpose-built off-road vehicle. The original Bronco let you open it up much like the CJs, even when it carried that fiberglass hard top. The later full-sized models kept that ability, though the Bronco II didn't.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
Tane94 A CVT is not the kiss of death but Nissan erred in putting CVTs in vehicles that should have had conventional automatics. Glad to see the Murano is FINALLY being redesigned. Nostalgia is great but please drop the Z car -- its ultra-low sales volume does not merit continued production. Redirect the $$$ into small and midsize CUVs/SUVs.