Piston Slap: A Self-defeating Technology Disorder?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Felix writes:

Got a Mazda 3 hatch to replace my 29-year-old MR2, and while it’s no MR2, it has its own benefits. But I detest Hill Launch Assist, and the power steering is the biggest reminder that it’s no MR2.

The Mazda power steering is better than I expected, but it’s still the first thing I notice when I start it up and always makes me want the MR2 back, three years later. I tried turning the engine off on a private road with just enough slope to keep moving, and it’s kind of scary to imagine that happening on a freeway, it’s so stiff and jerky. Is there any way to disable it and having just plain manual steering, to see what it’s like?

As for Hill Assist, what annoys me the most is not knowing if a slope is enough to trigger it or not; if I expect it, and it didn’t engage, there’s a tire chirp for no reason, and if I don’t expect it but it did engage, I sometimes kill the engine unless I’m paying attention. I can understand its attraction for weenies who are just learning stick, but I don’t need it and don’t want it.

Sajeev answers:

Calling this a disorder is a bit much, so perhaps let’s just do it, to it.

Regarding the (intrusive?) Hill Launch Assist, considering these links ( here, here) and what little I know about SCT’s tuning parameters, there’s a slim chance a performance tune could disable Hill Launch Assist while giving you a few more ponies. Better ask SCT, as I had the opportunity to 100 percent kill AdvanceTrac on my 2011 Ranger. But my tail-happy little rig should default to implementing mindless, stress-free control on slick roads. I am rather surprised you’d defeat Hill Launch Assist for similar reasons.

But hey, I live in a flat city so who cares what I think?

As previously mentioned, you can probably pull a fuse/disconnect the plug at the steering motor to experience manual steering on a car with big-ish wheels and a small tiller. I suspect you will regret it the minute you take a low speed, high steering input, parking maneuver.

[Image: Mazda]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Burgersandbeer Burgersandbeer on Jan 06, 2018

    My '08 5 series has hill assist. I had no idea when I bought it. The first time I expected it to roll and it didn't I thought I left the parking brake engaged or something else was wrong. Definitely a weird feeling. After 19 years in manuals I don't need it, but I can see it being convenient in some of the steeper areas of the SF area. Hopefully having it doesn't completely erode the hill start skill.

  • NG5 NG5 on Jan 06, 2018

    Surprising that there isn't a menu option to disable Hill Assist. There is on the Ford I drive. I curbed a wheel the first time I experienced it because I was parallel parking on a hill and didn't want to shift into reverse. I didn't realize what the car was doing. The system completely fooled me about where the clutch catch point was, and as soon as you touched the throttle the brake would drop entirely. Very disorienting first experience. I turned it off for months, but now I leave it on because I think it's better for clutch wear on hills. I hate having to move quick to avoid rolling back in traffic, and the temptation to ride the clutch if traffic is creeping uphill is too great. I'd recommend learning the system and getting used to it for those reasons.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next