British Invasion, Part 2: Jaguar Land Rover Sales Soar in U.S., No Thanks to Cars
It’s odd that distinctly British popular music dried up around the time the last vestiges of British Leyland disappeared from the nation. Rover Group bit the dust at the turn of the century, with its associated nameplates finding new homes in unlikely places.
Perhaps we have cumbersome, money-losing car conglomerates to thank for New Wave and Britpop. Maybe the Spice Girls killed everything. Who knows.
Jaguar and Land Rover, having once shared the same BL umbrella, were already orphans by that time, ultimately finding each other again thanks to the temporary love of foster parent Ford. Now owned by India’s Tata Motors and nowhere near as financially dodgy, Jaguar Land Rover is on a product tear. It’s these new models you can thank for the automaker’s record sales year in 2017 — both globally and in the United States.
Don’t thank traditional sedans.
Globally, JLR’s 2017 volume surpassed 2016 — another record year — by 7 percent. The Jaguar brand recorded a 20 percent uptick in global sales, with Land Rover posting a 2 percent increase. In the U.S., rising sales of both brands saw JLR carve out a 9 percent volume increase. The growth was split between Jaguar (up some 27 percent) and Land Rover (up 1 percent).
However, it’s not a continued love for all models across the range that’s boosting sales. Indeed, Jaguar’s sedans posted steep slumps in December. The compact XE, arriving at U.S. dealers in May 2016, ended its first full year on the market with an understandable year-to-date sales increase. Still, December brought a 39.2 percent year-over-year sales decline.
The midsize XF sank 29 percent last month — its fourth December decline — ending the year with a volume loss of 31.7 percent. The stately XJ fared no better, falling 39.7 percent in December. Total volume for 2017 was 29 percent lower than 2016’s figure.
In the sporting category, there was a true increase to be found with the F-Type, but not much of one. December sales rose 0.8 percent, year-over-year — meaning three extra buyers took home an F-Type. For the year, sales rose 0.96 percent, but let’s round that up to 1 percent in the interest of charity.
It was the F-Pace SUV that really brought home Jag’s bacon last year. Introduced in May 2016, the F-Pace’s first full year, coupled with first-full-year XE sales, delivered that impressive growth number. Sales have since reached a plateau, but the arrival of the smaller E-Pace SUV early this year should add significant volume to the brand’s balance sheet. The confusingly named I-Pace electric SUV will tempt green buyers not longer after that.
A bevy of fresh faces raised Land Rover’s fortunes in 2017. The next-generation Discovery arrived mid-year, replacing the boxy and beloved LR4 and sending Disco sales into the lower stratosphere. Discovery sales rose 173.2 percent in December. The lookalike Discovery Sport saw its sales drop 11.6 percent last month, for a year-to-date decline of less than half a percent.
Land Rover’s growing Range Rover family welcomed the Velar late last year, adding some 6,152 sales to the brand’s tally. The classic, top-flight Range Rover saw its sales rise 4.4 percent in the U.S. in 2017, while the Range Rover Sport watched its sales tumble 11.4 percent in a slowly declining market. Meanwhile, the aging Evoque lost 18 sales in December, year-over-year, but closed out 2017 with a sales gain of 8.2 percent.
Looking at these figures, it’s a head-scratcher as to why Land Rover thinks the Range Rover name could do with a non-traditional vehicle, perhaps even a sedan.
[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]
Stuki on Jan 09, 2018
If tailgate to front seatbacks are 6+ feet, the floor with rear seats folded is flat, and it comes with some semblance of a tow rating, that wagon will be a great car for hauling a Thruxton to track weekends at faraway tracks..... OTOH, if you can't fit a decent mattress flat in the back of it, I'd rather just get a sedan.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Arthur Dailey For the Hornet less expensive interior materials/finishings, decontent just a little, build it in North America and sell it for less and everyone should be happy with both the Dodge and the Alfa.
- Bunkie I so wanted to love this car back in the day. At the time I owned a GT6+ and I was looking for something more modern. But, as they say, this car had *issues*. The first of which was the very high price premium for the V8. It was a several thousand dollar premium over the TR-7. The second was the absolutely awful fuel economy. That put me off the car and I bought a new RX-7 which, despite the thirsty rotary, still got better mileage and didn’t require premium fuel. I guess I wasn’t the only one who had this reaction because, two years later, I test-drove a leftover that had a $2,000 price cut. I don’t remember being impressed, the RX-7 had spoiled me with how easy it was to own. The TR-8 didn’t feel quick to me and it felt heavy. The first-gen RX was more in line with the idea of a light car that punched above its weight. I parted ways with both the GT6+ and the RX7 and, to this day, I miss them both.
- Fred Where you going to build it? Even in Texas near Cat Springs they wanted to put up a country club for sport cars. People complained, mostly rich people who had weekend hobby farms. They said the noise would scare their cows. So they ended up in Dickinson, where they were more eager for development of any kind.
- MaintenanceCosts I like the styling of this car inside and out, but not any of the powertrains. Give it the 4xe powertrain - or, better yet, a version of that powertrain with the 6-cylinder Hurricane - and I'd be very interested.
- Daniel J I believe anyone, at any level, should get paid as much as the market will bear. Why should CEOs have capped salaries or compensation but middle management shouldn't? If companies support poor CEOs and poor CEOs keep getting rewarded, it's up to the consumer and investors to force that company to either get a better CEO or to reduce the salary of that CEO. What I find hilarious is that consumers will continue to support companies where the pay for the CEOs is very high. And the same people complain. I stopped buying from Amazon during the pandemic. Everyone happily buys from them but the CEO makes bank. Same way with Walmart and many other retailers. Tim Cook got 100m in compensation last year yet people line up to buy Iphones. People who complain and still buy the products must not really care that much.