Mini Seriously Streamlines Its Badge for 2018


Mini has revealed an ultra-streamlined logo that will begin appearing on the brand’s cars by March of 2018. Abandoning the three-dimensional model as the automaker’s official mark, the new crest isn’t any more exciting but does looks a bit more contemporary.
The new emblem actually made its debut on the Mini EV Concept in late summer. At the time, it wasn’t clear what the purpose of the new logo was. For all we knew it could have been a way of differentiating electrified models from the company’s main lineup, or simply be a way to further streamline the battery-driven concept. Instead, it’s to be the replacement for the old logo and will crop up in all the automotive locales one would expect: the hood, tailgate, steering wheel, and key fob.
However, straying too far from Mini’s current logo probably wouldn’t have made the marketing department happy. Mini thinks the flat, monochrome design makes key graphic elements easier to identify and brand recognition is an essential part of any automaker’s business.
“The preservation of the fundamental, tradition-steeped motif of a winged wheel with the brand name printed in capital letters at the centre ensures the logo will be instantly recognized,” Mini said in a release. “The deliberate avoidance of shading and grey tones creates a starkly contrasting black-and-white effect that conveys the authenticity and clarity of the new brand identity, its two-dimensional character also allowing universal application.”
The strategy is very similar to what BMW is doing with its own logo on flagship models. Of course, this should come as no surprise — BMW Group has owned Mini since 2000.
[Image: BMW Group]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Schurkey Decades later, I'm still peeved that Honda failed to recall and repair the seat belts in my '80 Civic. Well-known issue with the retractors failing to retract.Honda cut a deal with the NHTSA at that time, to put a "lifetime warranty" on FUTURE seat belts, in return for not having to deal with the existing problems.Dirtbags all around. Customers screwed, corporation and Government moves on.
- Bullnuke An acquaintance of mine 50+ years ago who was attending MIT (until General Hershey's folks sent him his "Greetings" letter) converted an Austin Mini from its staid 4 cylinder to an electric motored fuel cell vehicle. It was done as a project during his progression toward a Master Degree in Electrical Engineering. He told me it worked pretty well but wasn't something to use as a daily driver given the technology and availability of suitable components of the time. Fueling LH2 and LOX was somewhat problematic. Upon completion he removed his fuel cell and equipment and, for another project, reinstalled the 4 banger but reassembled it without mechanical fasteners using an experimental epoxy adhesive instead which, he said, worked much better and was a daily driver...for awhile. He went on to be an enlisted Reactor Operator on a submarine for a few years.
- Ajla $100k is walking around money but this is almost certainly the last Dodge V8 vehicle and it's likely to be the most powerful factory-installed and warrantied pushrod engine ever. So there is some historical applicability to things even if you have an otherwise low opinion of the Challenger.And, like I said up thread, if you still hate it will be gone soon anyway.
- Carlson Fan GM completely blew the marketing of the Volt. The commercials were terrible. You'd swear they told the advertising company to come up with an ad that would make sure no one went out and shopped a Volt after seeing it!...........LOL My buddy asked why I bought a car that only goes 40 miles on a charge? That pretty much sums up how confusing and uninformative the advertising was.
- HunterS This thing has had more farewell tours than Cher.
Comments
Join the conversation
I like it! The badge not the car. Ironically it reminds me of the USAF insignia not the British.
Any time you see a company "flatten" or otherwise simplify their logo, the intent is to increase legibility on a smartphone. It's funny, long ago company logos were largely constrained by print-related factors -- cost of using multiple colors or amount of embellishment based on the dpi available at the printer. All that went away in the 2000s and we had an explosion of color gradients and 3D shading as color printing became cheap and video resolution (and screen size) increased. Now the measure is how clean does it render when it's 1cm x 1cm on a 4" wide screen you glance at during red lights. I understand the intent, but from a lot of logos you'd think it was the 1920s again. Which is why I was actually surprised that Buick elected to reintroduce color to the tri-shield.