Truck Buyers Made a Choice in October (and Chose the Bigger One)
So diverse are the trim levels available in a modern pickup truck, it wouldn’t be shocking to see automakers begin offering a “Scotsman” edition, complete with three-on-the-tree shifter, for buyers accustomed to eating beans out of a can. On the other end of the ladder, surely “Limited,” “Platinum,” and “Tungsten” fall short in the luxury trappings offered within their leather-trimmed cabins. Buyers clearly need a wood-panelled humidor for their stogies.
Suffice it to say that automakers are making the purchase of a pickup truck more appealing than ever, and in October, buyers did their duty. October 2017 was a boffo month for light truck sales, with every full-size truck line recording rising year-over-year sales in the United States. Unfortunately, but not all that unfortunately (according to accountants, anyway), buyers offered a raised middle finger to mid-size pickups sold by those same automakers.
How well did trucks perform last month? The perennial frontrunner, Ford’s F-Series, saw sales climb 15.9 percent compared to October 2016. Over at General Motors, the Chevrolet Silverado posted a 6.8-percent sales boost, and its GMC Sierra twin rose 25.5 percent, year-over-year. Of the Detroit Three, only the Ram line came close to falling behind last year’s tally, posting a 0.7-percent sales gain. (Note: October 2017 featured one less selling day than the same month last year.)
Of the Japanese full-sizers, Toyota’s Tundra climbed 5.1 percent, while Nissan’s Titan line grew its volume to 29.3 percent, helped along by the addition of the huskier Titan XD.
Surely this is reason for smiles all around, no? Not when you factor in midsize truck sales. In the U.S. last month, every model save for one recorded a year-over-year sales hit. Are couples having more children, or has the generous incentives offered on full-sizers simply tipped buyers into a larger vehicle?
Whatever the motivation, buyers stayed away in droves. The class-leading Toyota Tacoma saw its sales fall four-tenths of one percent. The positively ancient (but cheap) Nissan Frontier fell 2.3 percent. Still, fall was even greater at GM. There, sales of the Chevrolet Colorado declined 5.6 percent, with the volume loss not entirely recouped by a 2.7-percent increase in sales of the slower-selling GMC Canyon.
The unibody, front (or all-wheel) drive Honda Ridgeline saw the worst sales decline of the bunch, sinking 19.6 percent.
North of the border, the news was much the same. Canadians took to pickups in even greater numbers in October, with the F-Series line growing a whopping 30 percent, year-over-year. GM Canada saw Silverado sales climb nearly 60 percent, with Sierra volume climbing 32.8 percent. For Ram, it was a slightly more disappointing month north of the border than south, with its Canadian sales sinking 3.2 percent. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles can take solace in the fact that Ram sales are still up 14.4 percent in the Great White North, year-to-date.
The Japanese offerings, which sell in far fewer numbers than in the U.S., also took a sales hit in Canada. Titan sales fell 21.9 percent, year-over-year, while Tundra volume shrunk 10.3 percent.
Canucks are an odd bunch, traditionally taking to smaller vehicles with less trepidation than their southern neighbors. This stereotype bore out in October. Whereas Americans turned their backs on mid-size trucks, the same segment saw significant growth above the 49th Parallel.
Colorado sales climbed 32.2 percent. The Canyon did even better, rising 59.4 percent. Compare that to the 2.4 percent increase enjoyed by the current sales front-runner, the Tacoma. However, the largest rise in popularity was made possible by history buffs flocking to Nissan dealers, resulting in the Frontier’s volume ballooning by over 91 percent.
Still, for all the midsize enjoyment occurring in Canada last month, Honda’s oddball Ridgeline couldn’t find any new suitors. Sales of the little truck headed in the exact opposite direction, falling 14.2 percent.
Depending on which side of the border you’re on, new truck buyers like their trucks either big, or big and less-big. Few of them, it seems, like their trucks unconventional.
[Images: General Motors, Ford, Honda]
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Bullnuke One might ask the reason that auto manufacturers desire its removal , knowing that an AM radio receiver portion of an "infotainment system" is a relatively tiny IC chip and exceedingly inexpensive to include. I remember constructing a simple AM receiver as a kid using a crystal, a variable capacitor, a toilet paper tube wrapped in bare copper wire, and a diode that could pick up AM stations from several miles away. A simple research of the pros/cons of AM vs FM may be instructive. Noise and static is a common issue (some of us older folks remember interference with the AM band from breaker-point ignition systems from times gone by and the methods to mitigate it). Is the push toward electrification reintroducing the electrical interference problem to the AM band that is expensively difficult to mitigate? Is the fact that AM, as imperfect as it may be, has a much longer signal "reach" than FM? The automobile industry Borg does nothing without a long term plan for greater and greater control of the vehicle that you pay for but do not truly own. The push to remove AM receivers from the vehicles that the meat puppets purchase but do not truly own indicates that there is, indeed, much more to this story...
- Ajla Not very impressive materials. And nearly every control touch point not on the screen is piano black.
- Azfelix Justice is depicted as being blind(folded) to represent the expectation that everyone is treated equally when judged. What could possibly go wrong when certain groups or individuals receive preferential or disadvantageous treatment by the legal branch of the government? /s
- Oberkanone AM Radio forever! Fully support government mandate to require AM in vehicles.
- Redapple2 looks like a H-K.
Alberta born and raised and I've never owned a pickup truck, WTF?
Even though we traded in our Luxury Brown Ram Big Horn in June for the Pacifica, we want the Ram back. Indeed, the minivan does get eleven more miles per gallon, but I should have thought among the lines of: The RAM had two years left on the current $369 per month lease -$8,856. The Pacifica has a new 36 month lease at $499 (some inequity with the RAM trade, of course)- $17,964. In a mathematically amazing sense, I missed the fact that we had over $9,000 to spend on fuel if we kept the truck anyway! Even though we had 23,000 miles on the truck in just one year, I now realize that most truck values decline rapidly, then hold steady and then actually rise in the last two years. So we are going to make double payments on the Pacifica and order a new 2018 Harvest Edition Ram. Leases are best in the spring anyway. . . Plus we have to get the 2018 Challenger GT in F8 green as well. Our 2016 Plum Crazy SXT Challenger is going to a State Department employee in Washington D.C. in February.