Tesla's Big Gamble With Other People's Money

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy
teslas big gamble with other peoples money

Unless you were living under a rock or on the moon late last week, you know Tesla introduced not one but two concepts on Thursday night — a Class 8 semi truck and a kinda-sorta-maybe Roadster (is it a roadster or a targa? It’ll only cost you a quarter mil to find out).

Since then, many corners of the internet have been yammering about the feasibility of Tesla’s plans, not to mention the wisdom of taking eyes off the very important ball that is the Model 3 in favor of two models that likely won’t appear until the next decade.

Tesla was founded in 2003, popping out an all-electric Roadster five years later. Costing $109,000, it went on to sell about 2,500 units during its production run, which ended when its contract with Lotus, which supplied “gliders” (motorless chassis and bodies), expired in 2011.

Chief Twitterer and CEO Elon Musk promised another model after the Roadster, which showed up in the form of the Model S midway through 2012. Sales have been nothing to sneeze at, nearly cresting 30,000 units during the calendar year of 2016. That’s a sum nearly eightfold compared to the number of XJs Jag managed to shift that same year. Heck, it’s more than 10,000 units greater than the total S-Classes sold by Mercedes-Benz.

The thing is, of course, that those manufacturers have many other models with which to make coin. Tesla does not. One of the ways a startup company (there is a significant argument to be made that Tesla is no longer a startup) can keep afloat is through rounds of funding, which can take any number of forms.

On June 29, 2010, Tesla launched its IPO on NASDAQ, when 13,300,000 shares of common stock was issued to the public at a price of US$17.00 per share. The IPO raised US$226 million. As I type this, Tesla stock sits at US$315.00 per share. It nearly touched US$400 in September. Launching an IPO, of course, suddenly means one’s company is no longer privately held, but it does provide an infusion of cash.

Tesla has now figured out a way to raise funds without giving up any part of the company: take deposits on cars that don’t exist based on promises that often skate the bounds of reality. When the company opened deposits on the Model 3, they hoovered up cash at the rate MC Hammer used to spend it. According to Musk, based on a press briefing this past July, over half a million people have now thrown down $1,000 each to reserve a Model 3, meaning Tesla has potentially brought in more than $500 million without the help of investors or by giving up any control of the company.

A similar tune was sung on Thursday, when it was revealed customers could reserve a Founders Series Roadster by plunking down the full $250,000 price tag. Tesla’s making 1,000 of them. Basic math teaches us that, if all 1,000 are reserved, a total of $250,000,000 will be deposited into Tesla’s coffers. That sum, it should be noted, exceeds the company’s initial IPO.

What do you think? Is all of this sustainable? Can Tesla possibly keep all of its promises? Will the house of cards fold like a cheap tent? Or will the company rise like a Phoenix and beat the big guns at their own game?

And – for fun – go look up John Phillip’s book God Wants You to Roll. Penned by one of the greatest automotive scribes to ever turn a phrase, it follows an advance fee fraud in which two out-of-work security guards took deposits on cars that didn’t exist, fleecing people across the nation to the eventual tune of $21 million. They assured their customers that refunds were available any time.

Sound familiar?

[Images: Tesla]

Join the conversation
7 of 84 comments
  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Nov 21, 2017

    As someone mentioned a few days ago, if ttac really believed Tesla was doomed, a "Tesla Death Watch" would be in print. The stock value reinforces the perceived risk of betting against Tesla.

    • See 1 previous
    • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Nov 21, 2017

      @Vulpine Nope, I obviously meant an explicit "Death Watch" series here on ttac. Waiting....

  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Nov 21, 2017

    Speaking of Tesla, why has ttac not even mentioned something as relevant to motorists as Musk's Boring Company?

    • See 2 previous
    • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Nov 21, 2017

      @brandloyalty No, it really doesn't spend much time on them, compared with the competition. And that's one thing I like about it.

  • Zerofoo I learned a long time ago to never buy a heavily modified vehicle. Far too many people lack the necessary mechanical engineering skills to know when they've screwed something up.
  • Zerofoo I was part of this industry during my college years. We built many, many cars for "street pharmacists" that sounded like this.Excessive car audio systems are kind of like 800 HP engines. Completely unnecessary, but a hell of a lot of fun.
  • DedBull In it to win it!
  • Wolfwagen IIRC I remember reading somewhere that the Porsche Cayenne was supposed to have a small gasoline-powered block heater. There was a loop in the cooling system that ran to the heater and when the temperature got to a certain point (0°C)the vehicle's control unit would activate the heater. I dont know if this was a concept or if it ever made it into production.
  • Jeffro As I sit here this morning with my 2 day old TRD OFF ROAD 4RUNNER tucked safely away in the garage, my head spins with this weird desire to locate a 85 LTD equipped with the epic 😵‍💫2.3 and the FOUR ON THE FLOOR. THE HOLY GRAIL. Ying and yang baby!The search begins.