EPA Ratings Appear for the New Jeep Wrangler

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The program for Jeep’s new Wrangler has had more leaks than a screen door on a submarine, from the leak of its owner’s manual and standard options list to the discovery by our own Bozi Tatarevic of potential power numbers for the JL’s new turbocharged mill.

Always of interest to new-car shoppers are the official fuel economy ratings. Such numbers just appeared for the new Wrangler on the EPA’s website, leaving only the texture on underside of the JL driver’s seat as a surprise for its big reveal at the L.A. Auto Show later this year.

The old-style Wrangler Unlimited is currently equipped with a prehistoric automatic transmission when lashed to the Pentastar V6. That powertrain combination is currently rated at 16 city/20 highway/18 combined, or 5.6 gallons per 100 miles.

For 2018, the new JL Wrangler Unlimited is available with the company’s eight-speed auto box when the Pentastar is selected. These extra cogs boost the JL’s fuel economy ratings to 18 city/23 highway/20 combined, or 5.0 gallons per 100 miles. Not a huge increase, but big enough of one that Jeep owners sliding into the new model will see a good difference in range. Assuming a 22-gallon fuel tank, an equivalent amount of gasoline would take the driver of the new Wrangler an extra 50 miles.

Those who choose to row their own will see an increase in fuel economy as well. The old six-speed, Pentastar equipper Wrangler Unlimited was rated at 16 city/21 highway/18 combined. The EPA rates the new one at 17 city/23 highway/19 combined. The powertrain and body configuration mentioned here is the only one currently listed for the new Wrangler on the EPA site.

The new Wrangler broke cover (in pictures) during the SEMA Show in Vegas, with a topless red Rubicon and brown Sahara Unlimited gracing the screens on our phones and laptops. The Rubicon was shown in Firecracker Red, doors removed, and – joy of joys – windshield folded down. It appears folding the windshield may be a bit easier in the new JL than in the old JK, where bugs-in-yer-teeth wheeling involves removing part of the roll bar system. BFGoodrich All Terrain KO2s and a manual transmission all seem present and accounted for on the Rubicon.

Also recently leaked was a supposed list of standard equipment for the three Wrangler trims that’ll be available at launch: Sport, Sahara, and Rubicon. In the Rubicon, we see 4.10 gears listed as standard equipment, paired with Tru-Lok front and rear axles. Those suspension sticks are listed as a ‘Dana M210 Wide Axle’ up front and a ‘Dana M220 Wide Axle’ astern. This ‘wheeler thinks that’s great news, pointing to a stout level of off-road prowess right out of the box.

Sport and Sahara models are listed in the document as getting a Command-Trac Part Time 4WD system, while the Rubicon is showing a 4:1 Rock-Trac HD Part Time 4WD system. The Rubicon will also likely have a power inverter and a 220 amp alternator, perfect for supplying juice to power-sapping electrical accessories.

The new Jeep Wrangler is expected to appear on stage at this year’s L.A. Auto Show.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 14 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Nov 06, 2017

    I don't get the hype about this vehicle; it has exactly the same outdated, unrefined look as every other Wrangler - which means it'll sell like crazy. And, BTW, Wrangler buyers don't care about fuel economy. The 10% bump may as well be a 10% decline; it wouldn't make any difference except in FCA's CAFE numbers.

    • See 6 previous
    • Caboose Caboose on Nov 07, 2017

      @jjster6 Take the roof, doors, and windshield off your car? I think you've just described the motorcycle.

  • CoastieLenn CoastieLenn on Nov 07, 2017

    I'm sorry, but YAAAAWWWWNNNNN.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I've mentioned before about being very underwhelmed by the Hornet for a $50000+ all in price tag. Just wasn't for me. I'd prefer a Mazda CX-5 or even a Rogue.
  • MaintenanceCosts Other sources seem to think that the "electric Highlander" will be built on TNGA and that the other 3-row will be on an all-new EV-specific platform. In that case, why bother building the first one at all?
  • THX1136 Two thoughts as I read through the article. 1) I really like the fins on this compared to the others. For me this is a jet while the others were propeller driven craft in appearance.2) The mention of the wider whitewalls brought to mind a vague memory. After the wider version fell out of favor I seem to remember that one could buy add-on wide whitewalls only that fit on top of the tire so the older look could be maintained. I remember they would look relatively okay until the add-on would start to ripple and bow out indicating their exact nature. Thanks for the write up, Corey. Looking forward to what's next.
  • Analoggrotto It's bad enough we have to read your endless Hyundai Kia Genesis shilling, we don't want to hear actually it too. We spend good money on speakers, headphones and amplifiers!
  • Redapple2 Worthy of a book
Next