Tesla Discovers an Obvious Place for Urban Owners to Fuel Up

by Steph Willems

Published: September 11th, 2017

tesla discovers an obvious place for urban owners to fuel up

Until now, Tesla’s growing network of Supercharger stations was generally aimed at the long-distance crowd. If a (very) premium-priced sedan can’t make the five-hour trip to your sister’s house for Thanksgiving, well, second thoughts might crop up about that purchase.

To accomplish the goal of Tesla proliferation, much of the automaker’s fast-charge network sprouted up in locales convenient for travellers. Places like Holiday Inn Express parking lots, restaurants, visitor centers, and Macadoodles Fine Wine & Spirits in Springfield, Missouri. In the Midwest, hungry travellers can hop off the Interstate and charge up at Meijer while shopping for juice boxes and potato wedges.

However, logic (and infrastructure) states that the majority of Tesla buyers, current and future, live in large cities and don’t leave town all that often. They’re also more likely live in condos with garages free of any plug-in points. Tesla’s latest round of Supercharger construction takes this into account, dropping the fast-charge stations directly where those urbanites inevitably show up once a week.

Starting in Chicago and Boston, the newest urban Superchargers will crop up in grocery store parking lots. A no-brainer, sure, but it’s a move that’s secondary to the company’s initial goal of cross-country Tesla viability.

The chargers located at downtown supermarkets will be supplemented by others at shopping centers and other high-traffic, centrally located destinations. As for cost, the same variable rates apply. With hundreds of thousands of reserved Model 3s waiting to be built, Tesla can’t afford to give new owners the same free ride they once enjoyed. It also can’t afford to not have the infrastructure in place to serve those vehicles.

From Tesla’s blog:

Superchargers in urban areas have a new post design that occupies less space and is easier to install, making them ideal for dense, highly populated areas. To increase efficiency and support a high volume of cars, these Superchargers have a new architecture that delivers a rapid 72 kilowatts of dedicated power to each car. This means charging speeds are unaffected by Tesla vehicles plugging into adjacent Superchargers, and results in consistent charging times around 45 to 50 minutes for most drivers.

The roll-out of new urban stations includes eight stalls in Boston and 10 in Chicago, both of which opened to drivers today.

[Image: Tesla]

#ElectricVehicles #EVs #Infrastructure #SuperchargerNetwork #Tesla

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 34 comments

APaGttH on Sep 12, 2017

I live in the land of Teslas. Any AMZN, GOOG, or MSFT employee who hit a nice vest in the last few years (remember boys and girls, MSFT stock has gone 2X since Ballmer left) is driving around in an S or an X around here. Nothing says I'm a tech employee who burned some shares like driving a Tesla. Nearest grocery store to my house is a Kroeger sub-brand flagship store located less than 1/2 a mile from a freeway interchange and has a line of electric car charging stations (not Tesla superchargers). The spots are ALWAYS full. Always. Of non-electric cars with drivers who are: a) Using the ATM machine by the electric car charging station b) Douche-nozzles who don't want to walk to the entrance of the store c) Occasionally a handicapped driver who parked there because the handicapped spots on either side of the electric car charging station are full (one likely by some douche nozzle using the ATM machine)

Like Reply
Brandloyalty on Sep 12, 2017

Interesting that TTAC has no article about what Tesla did for owners evacuating Florida. Some Model S' have the battery capacity limited by software. So they cost less. Whether this makes sense is another matter. Tesla fanned out a temporary software change allowing those owners to use the full capacity until mid-month.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)