Mexican Auto Industry Undeterred by 7.1 Magnitude Earthquake


Automakers spent Wednesday surveying factory sites in Central Mexico after a 7.1 magnitude earthquake ravaged the region Tuesday evening. However, after some momentary shutdowns, it’s looking like business as usual for most manufacturers. Despite countless injuries, over 200 fatalities, and widespread damage yet to be fully assessed, the automotive industry emerged from the quake largely unscathed.
Arguably the hardest hit, Volkswagen Group’s Puebla plant temporarily halted assembly so workers could inspect buildings for damage. Finding no significant structural harm, factory employees resumed third-shift production of the Jetta and Golf.
Audi’s crossover plant, also in the state of Puebla, sustained no obvious damage. It’s second shift was halted early on Tuesday as well. The company said third-shift production was canceled so that employees could attend to their loved ones after the quake.
Nissan similarly underwent a temporary shutdown on Tuesday and sent workers home for the remainder of the day in order to conduct a structural investigation of the site. “We will assess those facilities for damage before determining when they can return to safe operation. We expect to have more to share in the coming days,” the company said in an official statement.
While most other manufactures operate sites further away from the quake’s epicenter, south of Mexico City, Fiat Chrysler Toluca Car Assembly is only a little over an hour away. The factory would have been among the closest to ground zero, but FCA has yet to release any information on the status of its facilities. However, Ford said its Cuautitlán Assembly went undamaged despite its proximity to the Mexican capital.
Toyota and General Motors’ Mexican-based plants were both too far north to have been seriously affected.
Shipping lines are also largely unaffected. Preliminary infrastructure assessments indicate minimal destruction beyond city centers, despite the strength of the earthquake. Most roadways and rail lines remained intact, while shipping ports were too far away to have suffered from the incident.
[Source: Automotive News]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- RICK Lou, not sure about panthers and Cougars , BUT at 76,I now consider myself a vintage Rolls Canardly. I roll down one hill and Canardly get up the next! Wishing you a Very Happy, Merry HanaKwanzaMas. 🎅🎄
- Lou_BC The dealbreaker for me is the $80k starting price in Canada.
- Zipper69 The Grenadier was designed ground up to be a "better Land Rover" and by most press accounts comes close.What little we know about the Quartermaster it's clear that it's intended for serious off road work without additional aftermarket fettling needed.The price is clearly a barrier, but IF it's the real deal, it will have a slot in the market.
- Michael Charging more for less. Hmmmm
- FreedMike Meanwhile, over at Nissan, you can get a perfectly nice, well equipped Frontier four-door that has a V-6, 4wd, and is capable of all the "truck stuff" you could ever want for $36,000. And unlike the "pay over sticker or go f**k yourself" nonsense you get at the Toyota place, the Nissan store will probably happily make you a nice deal.
Comments
Join the conversation
The pictures and videos coming out of Mexico City are horrifying. I’ve seen the aftermath of a few earthquakes (I’m a structural engineer) and it’s not a new story. The city is basically built on a bowl of jello that amplifies the ground motions. Here in San Francisco, parts of the city had a similar effect in 1989, with the Cypress superstructure and buildings in the Marina District built on low-quality fill. That earthquake would not otherwise have been a major one in SF, given the distance to the epicenter. One major reason the auto industry is fine is that its facilities are relatively new and they’ve actually been engineered. The one in the photo either precedes building codes or ignored them. That’s common here too (buildings designed before adequate codes – it’s harder to get away with ignoring them), especially because we keep learning about earthquakes so our old codes weren’t all that great.
Natural disasters are generally unforgiving if you build over/near former lakes, swamps, and river beds. Taking some care on your sighting and building standards always pays (relative) dividends.