Tesla Hoping to Scrounge $1.5 Billion With Automotive War Bonds

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
tesla hoping to scrounge 1 5 billion with automotive war bonds

Tesla Motors launched the Model 3 last month and has been scrambling to improve production volume as over 500,000 eagerly await delivery. However, by the time Tesla hits its targeted production rate of 10,000 units per week in 2018, it is still going to have months — if not a full year — of orders sizzling on the back burner.

It’s not the worst problem to have, since each reservation holder tossed down a $1,000 deposit. But CEO Elon Musk is aware that meeting demand is going to be an uphill battle. “We’re going to go through at least six months of manufacturing hell,” Musk told the press ahead of Model 3 launch event.

With the company already having spent over $2 billion in capital this year, restocking the safe is probably a good idea. As an upstart automaker framing itself as going into battle with traditional manufacturers, Tesla is issuing $1.5 billion in junky war bonds to fund the coming onslaught.

Granted, the company used less flowery language in its press release when it announced that it “intends to offer, subject to market and other conditions, $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of its senior notes due 2025.” But the funds will, no doubt, go to “strengthen its balance sheet during this period of rapid scaling with the launch of Model 3, and for general corporate purposes.”

Tesla isn’t broke. It still has “slightly over” $3 billion at the ready, according to its second quarter financial report. But that same report specifies that it also expects to spend $2 billion over the next six months — and while the company has seen an overall growth in its operations this year, it still isn’t profitable. In fact, Tesla claimed a $401.4 million loss in the quarter that ended June 30th, compared to a $293.2 million hit in the same period for 2016.

That might make it sound like Musk is trying to pull a fast one on the public, but this has always been a faith-based company. So long as investors continue believing in Tesla, there’s no reason to think it won’t persist as an automaker and make good on most of its promises. Despite a modest dip after Musk’s “manufacturing hell” comment, the company’s share price rebounded for August almost immediately and is presently trading at $365.28 as it progresses toward a record high.

Before that, Goldman Sachs said it could see the company’s production levels about to plateau and slashed its 12-month price target valuation by roughly 40 percent in July — when share prices initially began slipping. However, Musk has stated there should be “zero concern” about Tesla achieving a production rate of 10,000 cars a week before the end of next year.

If anything, the junk bonds will likely serve as a buffer as Tesla enters into unknown territory. Any number of disasters could befall it, and most of them have little to do with Wall Street. As calm and collected as Elon appears, ramping up production at this rate is a massive undertaking. Whether you’re of the EV faithful or a disbeliever, you have to appreciate what it’s trying to accomplish.

Last year, the automaker averaged 1,465 cars a week in total. Under ideal circumstances, Tesla wants to see 5,000 weekly deliveries of the Model 3 by December — plus however many Model S and Model X deliveries it can manage.

However, that doesn’t mean the company will suddenly become profitable. In fact, most analysts seem to agree that Tesla will be cash flow negative until 2019. Currently, the California company has total debt of around $8.2 billion, over half of which is long-term debt.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Car Ramrod Car Ramrod on Aug 09, 2017

    Not a bad move, Telsa. Low interest rates for high quality debt and tight credit spreads in high yield mean they'll be historically low rates. Companies that don't even need the liquidity, like Apple, have taken advantage.

  • Beachy Beachy on Aug 12, 2017

    They sold $1.8 billion of these bonds due to extra high demand.

  • Sgeffe Why on Earth can’t you just get the torque specs and do it yourself if you’re so-inclined?!
  • Sgeffe As was stated in another comment, the FAA nominee went down in flames. But the NTSB chairwoman certainly didn’t, and she’s certainly not qualified either!Lots of this kind of stuff going on both sides of the aisle—Ben Carson would have arguably made a better Surgeon General than HUD Secretary under Trump, for example.
  • Art Vandelay Interesting, the Polestar 2 I had as a rental utilized Android Automotive which is what GM said it is going to exclusively, yet it still offers Apple CarPlay according to this. Wonder if GM will do the same.
  • Stuart de Baker EVs just aren't ready for prime time for those with a single car and who take road trips. Being able to charge as soon as you arrive at a charging station, and even the chargers working on your car is a crapshoot. In the former case, you could have to wait for nearly an hour while someone else is charging.I also don't find EVs particularly fun to drive (I've driven a Tesla Model S and an Ionic 5.) I LOVE driving my '08 Civic (stick). I love the handling, the feel and responsiveness of the engine, the precise steering (the Michelin Pilot Ultra Sport tires help, but even with the snows on, the car is a joy). I have 152k on the clock, and hopefully another 25 years or so of driving (I was born early in the Eisenhower Administration and I have exceptionally healthy habits), and I'm going to try to keep the Civic for the duration.My Civic causes a less global warming emissions than some of these humongous battery operated trucks.
  • FreedMike They should throw in a Lordstown pickup with every purchase. Make it the “vapor twofer.”