Toyota CEO Promises Automaker Will Be Better, Faster, Stronger

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota Motor North America, is going to great lengths to tell the world his company is only going to get better in the years to come — proving to his employer that he knows exactly what his job entails. In addition to explaining how the brand’s new modular architecture will give assembly lines much-needed flexibility, this week also had him announcing Toyota won’t dawdle anymore on getting product into consumer hands.

“I think we’re going to be quicker to market,” Lentz announced to the press at Toyota’s brand new $1 billion Texas headquarters on Thursday. “Before if you were part of the sales organization, you had your own legal team [and] HR team, so there was a lot of redundancy across the organization … we were able to streamline that and, with a lot of the headcount changes, we were able to hire more engineers to our operation in Ann Arbor, as we continue to develop vehicles here in North America, for North America.”

While Toyota’s U.S. R&D remains fixated in Michigan, the Texas base of operations unifies thousands of employees under one massive roof that had previously been spread across the country. According to WardsAuto, Lentz claimed Toyota retained 72 percent of its workforce from California, Kentucky, and New York. Around 1,400 employees opted out of making the move.

There is time, however, for them to change their minds. Toyota is giving employees a two-year window in which to relocate and is incentivizing employees who stay with the company in Plano, Texas as well. “I fully expect that we will have people [go], as they reach retirement age, two or three years down the road,” Lentz said. “But I really don’t expect to see what Nissan saw. That was a fairly large drop-off.”

Nissan encountered problems when it lost 60 percent of its 1,300 Los Angeles headquarters staffers and executives after relocating to Nashville in 2006. Attempting to do the same thing, Toyota has taken every precaution to avoid similar setbacks.

“I came to Nashville with only two of my product planners,” stated Larry Dominique in a 2014 interview with Automotive News, who originally relocated with Nissan North America as vice president of product planning but eventually returned to California in 2011 to become executive VP of TrueCar. “People said we’d never be able to recruit the new talent we needed to replace everyone,” Dominique recalled. “And that did take some work. But we did it. We assembled a great staff.”

Toyota achieved a much higher retention rate while using Nissan’s example as a cautionary tale. It went a little further to make the move easier on staff and is showcasing the campus’ seven office buildings as a desirable place to work. In addition to providing space to work, the Plano location also has an on-site pharmacy, physician, and 11 eating establishments. Toyota also saw fit to provide non-traditional office spaces and amenities — although it only cited microwaves and refrigerators, which we are willing to bet most offices already have.

Toyota has hired 800 workers locally, most of which live in the Dallas area, for about 1,000 open positions. There will be 4,200 permanent employees at the new HQ, but the campus can accommodate up to 6,500, according to Lentz.

Toyota is also using the Texas locale to highlight its commitment to green technologies, claiming it possesses the largest non-utility-owned solar array in the state. While that only accounts for 30 percent of the facility’s needs, the automaker has claimed the remaining power all comes from renewable energy sources. There is also a massive rainwater collection grid to harvest 400,000 gallons of fluid to use in irrigation. But Governor Greg Abbott said water and power weren’t nearly as important as the people Texas had to offer.

“The greatest resource we have here in the Lone Star State is our highly-skilled workforce that draws global businesses like Toyota to Texas every day,” Abbott said during the HQ’s opening ceremony. “The 4,000 jobs added and Toyota’s impressive new facility are proof of the remarkable momentum of Texas’ continuing economic expansion. I am proud that Toyota is expanding here, and I thank them for their commitment to being an important part of our Texas community.”

Even though the campus opening was little more than an opportunity for Toyota executives and local dignitaries to issue corporate praise until they were blue in the face, the company has been making serious moves in 2017. Slower than its competitors to modernize, the brand has begun taking swifter steps toward electrification and updating its production facilities. It has also started putting more money into R&D and expanded its engineering operations in Michigan. Texas’ role to play is to ensure nothing holds Toyota back in putting that fruit on the market in a timely manner.

[Images: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jul 10, 2017

    "Toyota CEO Promises Automaker Will Be Better, Faster, Stronger" Que sound track from "The Six Million Dollar Man".

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jul 10, 2017

    It good to see these higher paying Toyota jobs. I did read an article 3-4 years ago about the Chinese. The Chinese are using specialist design and engineering studios to design cars. The claim back then was 15 months from an idea to the first vehicles rolling off the production line. This is one area the "West" must tackle in competing with the Chinese. If the Chinese can produce a vehicle quicker it will have an edge on the Western vehicle manufacturers. Maybe the West might need to look at how we are designing vehicles. Should we have only a few design and engineering studios/complexes?

    • Joeaverage Joeaverage on Jul 10, 2017

      Will the US gov't ever let Chinese cars be sold here? I know the US isn't the whole world of course. I'm sure Europe and Russia already allow Chinese brands to be sold there which says to me that their markets are more open and free than our's. There would be a whole gaggle of sub-prime rate people who would get over any xenophobia and would buy a Chinese car if it was halfway good and cheap enough - think Kia Sephia grade cars.

  • Lou_BC I've had my collision alert come on 2 times in 8 months. Once was when a pickup turned onto a side road with minimal notice. Another with a bus turning left and I was well clear in the outside lane but turn off was in a corner. I suspect the collision alert thought I was traveling in a straight line.I have the "emergency braking" part of the system turned off. I've had "lane keep assist" not recognize vehicles parked on the shoulder.That's the extent of my experience with "assists". I don't trust any of it.
  • SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
  • Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
  • SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
  • Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.
Next