QOTD: Is Buick a Premium, Luxury, Upmarket Auto Brand in America, or Not?
Use whatever designation you must, but you know what we’re asking. In 2017, is Buick one of America’s premium brands? A competitor for Lexus and Audi? A rival for BMW and Jaguar?
On July 19, Buick released the first images, specs, and pricing details for the next-generation 2018 Buick Regal GS. While dropping the price of the basic Regal to $25,915 — not that much money for a 250-horsepower 2.0T midsize hatchback — Buick apparently improved the sporty GS in every way. The result: the GS is only ten bucks away from being a $40,000 car. The more powerful Ford Fusion Sport is $5,510 cheaper. The Audi S4 is some $12,000 more costly.
But Buick is more than just an intangible no-man’s-land price point. Buick is also a brand that sends mixed messages: advertising that suggests it’s not worthy of praise on the one hand; the new Avenir sub-brand on the other.
What say you: is Buick just another luxury wannabe, or is Buick selling premium goods at a discount?
Sitting in the back seat of my mother’s white 1986 Buick Century, I had no idea as a child that Buick was, had ever been, or ever would be a luxury brand. Decades later, driving a quiet, relatively common, 138-horsepower Buick Encore, a staple of Buick circa twenty-teens, I wondered if Buick was, had ever been, or ever would be a luxury brand.
But forget what other people think, and don’t assume you know what I think. For the purposes of this QOTD, dismiss the belief that Regal GS buyers will never be prospective Audi S4 owners who just decided to save $12K. If only for a moment, reject the idea that your neighbours would never cross-shop the Buick Envision with the blue-collar Chevrolet Equinox.
You decide. On your ledger, in your mind, with your money — is Buick a true American luxury auto brand? Is Buick forever resigned to toil in mainstream obscurity with Chevrolet, Ford, and Honda, or does Buick earn unusual status as Detroit’s Acura?
[Images: General Motors]
Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Lou_BC "15mpg EPA" The 2023 ZR2 Colorado is supposed to be 16 mpg
- ToolGuy "The more aerodynamic, organic shape of the Mark VIII meant ride height was slightly lower than before at 53.6 inches, over 54.2” for the Mark VII."• I am not sure that ride height means what you think it means.Elaboration: There is some possible disagreement about what "ride height" refers to. Some say ground clearance, some say H point (without calling it that), some say something else. But none of those people would use a number of over 4 feet for a stock Mark anything.Then you go on to use it correctly ("A notable advancement in the Mark VIII’s suspension was programming to lower the ride height slightly at high speeds, which assisted fuel economy via improved aerodynamics.") so what do I know. Plus, I ended a sentence with a preposition. 🙂
- ToolGuy The dealer knows best. 🙂
- ToolGuy Cool.
- ToolGuy This truck is the perfect size, and the fuel economy is very impressive.-This post sponsored by ExxonMobil
As pointed out above, it's sort of middling entry-luxury with Acura and Volvo. It's not really all that premium, and it's not upmarket.
Buick is GM's Chinese-driven brand that also sells some product in their secondary, less important market, the USA. And no it's not luxury, it's Sino luxury.