One Look Shouldn't Fit All Sizes: Jaguar Design Boss Plans to Help Buyers Tell Models Apart

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Fortunately, premium automakers have not adopted a One Size Fits All approach. We have choices. Plenty of choices.

Increasingly, however, we are seeing a One Look Fits All Sizes methodology, limiting our ability to distinguish between a 3 Series, 5 Series, and 7 Series at BMW; between A4s, A6s, and A8s at Audi; or between C, E, and S-Class sedans at Mercedes-Benz.

With the second-generation XF appearing all but identical to the first XF, and the subsequent launch of the entry-level XE closely resembling an abbreviated XF, Jaguar’s guilty of the same crime against differentiation.

Fortunately, famed Jaguar design director Ian Callum says future Jaguar designs won’t be revealed merely as S, M, and L versions of the same t-shirt.

“We will separate them more in the future,” Callum told Autocar, referencing the XE and XF in particular and confirming that the next-generation XE will also be rear-wheel-drive-based. While connected by traditional Jaguar themes, Jaguar will provide greater distinctions between its growing lineup. “There will be a constant grille, then a more flexible front.”

This explains why the new E-Pace, revealed yesterday, doesn’t look exactly like the larger F-Pace crossover. “We wanted the E-Pace to have its own character, its own place,” Callum told AutoExpress. “So its headlights are from the F-Type.”

Callum also says the E-Pace’s key side signatures, a line that begins at the headlights and disappears at the rear door along with a higher line that accentuates the hind quarters, are inspired more by the F-Type sports car than the F-Pace utility vehicle.

Design unity is integral to image building, particularly for luxury brands. High-end automakers want their entry-level buyers to feel as though they bought into something premium, an upmarket lifestyle. But if the entry-level model doesn’t look anything like its more expensive siblings, then what is the image-conscious customer acquiring?

Unfortunately, design unity has gradually become design uniformity. Without a measuring tape, it’s not easy to tell which one is the Audi A4 and which one is the Audi A6. Is that a C-Class Cabriolet or an E-Class Cabriolet?

Now it becomes Ian Callum’s job to convince Jaguar’s other division heads that some differentiation is healthy, as the need for greater distinction may only increase. Asked by Autocar about the potential for even smaller Jaguars, “No plans, but I’d like to think so,” Callum said.

[Images: Jaguar]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Scott25 Scott25 on Jul 15, 2017

    The only ones I can't tell apart are the Audis, and that's only because the A6 and A8 sell in such minuscule numbers. The Mercedes can easily be figured by amount of ugliness, they generally get better looking the bigger they are.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Aug 01, 2017

    Say what you want about the Buick ventiports, but when they were properly implemented it told you exactly what model it was.

  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
Next