Don't Say You Saw This Coming: Jaguar Now Earning 11 Percent of U.S. Volume With Diesel

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Jaguar’s U.S. sales averaged 3,400 units per month over the last year, a huge turnaround after a decade in which Jaguar’s U.S. dealers sold roughly 1,200 cars per month.

Most of the credit for Jaguar’s U.S. resurgence belongs to the brand’s first-ever utility vehicle, the F-Pace.

A fair chunk of the credit also belongs to the XE, the first entry-level sedan in Jaguar’s lineup since the X-Type disappeared after the 2008 model year.

And some of the credit belongs to an engine formula that’s earned more than its fair share of negative press over the last two years: diesel.

During the first half of 2017, diesel-powered models accounted for 11 percent of Jaguar’s U.S. volume, up from nil in the first-half of 2016.

Just as the F-Pace pieces together the largest swath of Jaguar buyers, so too the F-Pace earns the lion’s share of diesel sales at Jaguar. Of the 2,251 diesel-powered Jaguars sold in the United States in the first six months of 2017, 1,368, or 61 percent, have been of the F-Pace variety.

Jaguar also sold 258 copies of the XF with a diesel engine. Jaguar’s monthly sales report breaks down the XE’s diesel sales even further: 274 of the 625 XE diesels sold were rear-wheel drive.

Though long a diesel player in the executive car market across the pond — you’ll recall Jeremy Clarkson’s range test on Top Gear’s series 12 in a Jaguar XJ — Jaguar and diesel hardly go together in the mind of the American luxury car buyer.

Moreover, Clarkson’s diesel was a six-cylinder twin-turbo unit that shifted the big XJ from nought to 60 in less than eight seconds.

The diesel Jaguar is utilizing in its North American lineup, on the other hand, is a 180-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder. Torquey? Sure. But in the midsize Jaguar sedan, the XF, Car And Driver says the diesel doesn’t exactly produce impressive forward progress. 60 mph comes up in, wait for it, keep on waiting…

8.7 seconds.

On the plus side, while Jaguar demands a $1,500 premium for diesel powerplants in the XE and XF sedans, diesel is the far more economical route in the wildly more popular F-Pace. The diesel F-Pace is $4,210 less costly than the next most affordable F-Pace.

Also distinguishing diesels at Jaguar is the dearth of available oil burners at former diesel players in America’s luxury category. There are presently no diesel engines in the lineup of Audi and Mercedes-Benz. This is now a fight between Jaguar and BMW. According to HybridCars.com, BMW has sold 2,159 diesel-powered vehicles this year.

With 2,251 diesel-powered Jaguars sold already in 2017, diesel Jags are nearly twice as common as XJs and very nearly as popular as the F-Type.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Detroit-X Detroit-X on Jul 13, 2017

    Jaguar? Who cares. Let's talk toothpaste brands...

  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Jul 13, 2017

    It just gets unjaguarish at the gas bar where you have to lineup for fewer pumps with commercials. Watch out for diesel-glove on those Gucci's...

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next