Shenanigans: Toyota's 'Flying Car' Doesn't Fly and Isn't a Car
We need to have a candid discussion about flying cars. Automobiles and airplanes entered into the mainstream around the same time, and we’ve talked about combining them into a singular platform ever since. While nobody has successfully pulled it off, we keep acting like the technology is right around the corner. The closest we’ve gotten are the Terrafugia Transition and Pal-V One. However, both of those products make major on-road sacrifices, undergo a pre-flight metamorphosis, and require regular access to a runway. They’re still not representative of anything we’d consider a real car.
Lack of success hasn’t stopped automakers from dabbling in the field of aviation. Toyota has purchased Cartivator Resource Management in the hopes that its “flying car” expertise will yield a vehicle capable of lighting the torch at the 2020 Olympic games in Tokyo. Still, based on the firm’s progress to date, we can only imagine the attempt ending in a globally broadcast fiery disaster.
Cartivator’s current project essentially involves aluminum scaffolding attached to eight propellers. It’s an uncooperative and suicidal drone that manages to hover a few feet off the ground before immediately crashing to the pavement — and the company wants someone to pilot it above a flaming cauldron in just a few years.
Toyota has invested 42.5 million yen ($386,000) into the startup for work on its “Sky Drive,” and Cartivator hopes the investment will provide the means to move the project along. The team’s lead, Tsubasa Nakamura, told The Associated Press the company wants to provide a vehicle offering seamless transition between driving and flight, à la “Back to the Future.”
“I always loved planes and cars. And my longtime dream was to have a personal vehicle that can fly and go many places,” said Nakamura.
While the company looks to have an incredibly long way to go before Sky Drive goes anywhere, vertical takeoff would set it apart from literally every other “flying car” milling around in development hell. But it doesn’t currently have wheels, a roof, or a seat for the exceedingly brave pilot this giant quadcopter is supposed to cart around.
Even if it could be made safe, Cartivator’s ultimate goal for the project wouldn’t result in something you’d ever be able to call a car. Members of the Sky Drive team have suggested the vehicle should one day be capable of flight, with a maximum ceiling of around 30 feet.
Automakers, please stop calling these objects flying cars. Media outlets, please stop acting like this technology is anywhere near mainstream acceptance. What we have now are roadworthy aircraft and that’s likely all we’ll see for the foreseeable future. Regulators would never allow for deafeningly loud, open-prop vehicles capable of three-dimensional mobility and the autonomous technology needed to make them safe doesn’t exist.
Re-categorize them as mobility solutions, single-occupant flight systems, or whatever the hell else you want to call them. But please stop referring to them as “flying cars” because we’re calling shenanigans.
[Image: Cartivator Resource Management]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- FreedMike Suggested use for the one year delay: de-uglify it.
- MaintenanceCosts How strong is the second power stroke as a percentage of the strength of the first?
- Steve Biro It doesn’t matter. The Colorado/Canyon, like most trucks, has gotten too big, too heavy and too expensive.
- SCE to AUX "EV sales are still growing but are expanding slower than expected". You mean slower than the outlandish claims made by politicians and some mfrs? Nobody ever believed those claims, but now they're used as evidence the EV market is failing even as it's growing. Also, I was told here that Toyota was going to crush Tesla when they decide to do it. Maybe those 10 EV models in 2026 will accomplish that.
- Bd2 Hyundai's domination in this segment is no doubt the reason for Toyota's retreat. What a backward right wing godless company of Japanese. Hyundai is like the Israel of EVs with the best technology, faith and fighting power. Toyota is pathetic Gaza Strip and Lebanon and they build hilux for terrorists.
Comments
Join the conversation
Why does this thing not have auto-hover or some kind of stabilization software running? Model helicopters have it, drones have it...heck, I used to write this kind of real-time feedback-response hardware control code myself back in the dawn of of computing. If I could do it with a 6502 processor and 48K of RAM then anyone can do it. All engineers, no coders?
THIS is what $ 390k gets you? F**k off...