Ford to Announce Firing of CEO Mark Fields This Morning: Report


Mark Fields has reportedly been fired from his position as CEO of Ford Motor Company, to be replaced by a man he appointed as head of the automaker’s mobility subsidiary.
According to Forbes, the company will announce the appointment of Jim Hackett as CEO this morning, part of a broader shakeup of the company’s upper ranks. Hackett, former CEO of Steelcase, served on the automaker’s board for three years before being named head of Ford Smart Mobility LLC in March, 2016.
Fields, a 28-year Ford veteran who replaced Alan Mulally in mid-2014, was reportedly booted by the company’s board amid a continued decline in share values. Two weeks ago, the CEO was grilled by board members and shareholders alike over the direction he has taken the company.
Sources told Forbes Executive Chairman Bill Ford and the rest of the board had lost confidence in Fields’ ability to run the company. Since taking the helm, Ford’s share prices have dropped by 40 percent. Compared to rival GM’s aggressive streamlining and healthier balance sheet, Ford recently saw its first-quarter profits sink 35 percent.
Many question whether Field’s aggressive push for Ford’s entry into the realm of mobility services has harmed the company’s financial footing.
The report suggests new roles are on the way for other executives within the company. Those individuals include James Farley, president of Ford’s Europe, Middle East and Africa division, and Joseph Hinrichs, head of Ford North America. Ray Day, group vice president of communications, will reportedly be replaced by Mark Trudy, vice president of communications for the company’s Asia-Pacific division.
Before being named CEO on July 1, 2014, Fields served as Ford’s chief operating officer. Ford has announced a news conference at its world headquarters in Dearborn at 9:45 this morning.
[Image: Ford Motor Company]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Alan I don't know how well Mustangs are selling in the US, but here in Australia since its release a while back Mustang sales have taken a nose dive. Maybe those who wanted a Mustang have bought, or Ford needs a new Mustang model, maybe both.
- Alan GM is still dying. The US auto manufacturing sector overall needs to restructure. It is heavily reliant on large protected vehicles with far more protection than the EU has on its vehicles (25% import tariff).Globally GM has lost out in the EU, UK, Australia, etc. GM has shut down in Australia because it is uncompetitive in a global market. Ford still exists in Australia but is reliant on a Thai manufactured pickup, the Ranger which is Australia's second largest selling vehicle.The US needs to look at producing global products, not 'murica only products. Asians and Europeans can do it. America is not unique.
- Duane Baldinger Ya my cupcake Mailman will love it!
- Duane Baldinger Where can I send the cash? It's a surprise BDAY present for my cupcake Mailman. D Duane
- Art Vandelay Pour one out for the Motors Liquidation Corporation
Comments
Join the conversation
Lots of Monday morning quarterbacking here. Ford is doing fine, but could be better. The F150 was a huge risk that worked out very well. Lincoln is dong well for the minimal investment involved - particularly versus the huge sums misspent at Cadillac. Ford's biggest problems are reliability and fuel efficiency. The vehicles have sub par reliability, and the efficiency on their turbo cars - especially the real world results - are terrible. Hard to justify great new investments in small cars, but if the focus and fiesta were reliable and fuel efficient they would,be respectable contenders in their classes. Ford also has moved to break even in Europe, while GM had to give up and abandon that market.
Well said, Deadweight! I commend you. Succinct too! I would add this: That is generally the way it has been for a while. During the eras from 1900 to 1930, and again 1945-1973, the interests of big money coincided with the interests of "middle" and "working" America. That is, the path to even bigger riches for big money was to invest and to PAY the masses well. Since 1973 in America, and 1990 in the West in general, this has ceased to be the case. This is why we (the 'average' American) is running--on a treadmill, and going backwards.