American Car Buyers Can't Get Enough of Long-Term Car Loans

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
american car buyers can t get enough of long term car loans

The low, low monthly payments offered by spreading the cost of a new or used vehicle across a vast gulf of time is certainly an attractive one, even though the practice is fraught with hidden danger.

For U.S. car buyers, it has also become a very popular one, with data showing just how many people have decided to embrace a 73- to 84-month payment plan. Not only are their spending habits changing, they’re also changing their lender.

According to data from information services company Experian published by Automotive News, long-term loans are proving increasingly popular with both new and used car buyers.

In the first quarter of 2009, the depths of the recession, 11.7 percent of auto loans were 73 to 84 months. At the time, consumer spending was not what it once was (or is now), with even stably employed people holding off on big ticket items like vehicles. Fast-forward eight years, and the picture changes drastically.

During the first two months of 2017, 33.8 percent of new-vehicle loans fell within this category. Not only that, term lengths within that top period are on the rise. Karl Kruppa, a senior automotive solutions consultant for Experian, says a full three-quarters of new-car loans in the fourth quarter of 2010 were 73 to 75 months. Now, borrowers are increasingly tapping the ceiling of that term window. In the final quarter of last year, 28.7 percent of those loans were for the full 84-month term, up from 17.1 percent in Q4 2010.

The trend carries over into used vehicles. While 30 percent of loans for 2016 model year vehicles fall within the 73 to 84 month term window, some lenders are now offering long-term loans on vehicles up to seven years old. Minuscule payments, yes, but with a larger cost of borrowing over the long term. With this kind of deal, be it on a new or old vehicle, cash-strapped buyers can find themselves in a much nicer vehicle than they thought they could afford — only to be soaked by interest or to realize their vehicle is worth less than what they owe.

Whatever the vehicle, consumers are increasingly turning to credit unions for their long-term loans. While banks and automakers’ financial divisions still see plenty of demand, credit unions see the most. Auto loans of 73 months or more made up 30.8 percent of the credit union portfolio in Q4 2016. For even longer-term loans, credit unions are still the preferred go-to.

[Image: Bike Tourist/]

Join the conversation
2 of 97 comments
  • Mikey Mikey on Jun 01, 2017

    Some very interesting, and insightful comments here. Let me add my two cents worth. I would be one of those aging "boomers" . My wife and I worked long term for big corporations . Yes, and we enjoy that elusive benefit known as company pensions. We bought, and sold houses, a cottage, and countless vehicles. We paid for educations, weddings, and helped both kids with a down payment on their first house. Believe me, we gave "creative financing" a new meaning. That being said, early on we both vowed to be debt free before we turned 60. We hit that goal when I was 57. Today I get antsy when my Visa card hits $250.00 Just a little advice, to the much younger crowd here. Don't even entertain the thought of carrying debt into retirement. By all means, do what ever you need to do while bringing up family . If it means a 7 year loan to keep a reliable vehicle on the road ? Do what you have to do. Just keep in mind that one day you will be old. Don't make the mistake that so many of my fellow Baby Boomers have. I've watched too many of my peer group sign the retirement papers , while carrying car payments, and mortgages . I see those same people today, stocking shelves at Wall Mart, and working 12 hour shifts behind the wheel of a cab. Just my 00.2

  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Jun 01, 2017

    We just bought 2 new to us cars (2012 G37S, 2011 MKX) with a decent bit down and 60 month loans. At 2.2% APR it was a complete no brainer; the combined interest on the 2 ~15K loans is about $1500. I also have no qualms about having these cars that far out... I bought a 10 year old 350Z and drove it for 2 years; one of the most reliable cars I've owned. Only real scare is infotainment honestly; My Ford Touch is modern enough for us and while the G's infotainment is a bit ancient the aftermarket has stepped in with some pretty slick updates.

  • Redapple2 Why does anyone have to get permission to join? Shouldnt the rules to race in a league be straight forward like. Build the car to the specs. Pay the race entry fee. Set the starting grid base on time trials.?Why all the BS?I cant watch F1 any more. No refuel. Must use 2 different types of tires. Rare passing. Same team wins every week. DRS only is you are this close and on and on with more BS. Add in the skysports announcer that sounds he is yelling for the whole 90 minutes at super fast speed. I m done. IMSA only for me.
  • Redapple2 Barra at evil GM is not worth 20 mill/ yr but dozens (hundreds) of sports players are. Got it. OK.
  • Dusterdude @SCE to AUX , agree CEO pay would equate to a nominal amount if split amongst all UAW members . My point was optics are bad , both total compensation and % increases . IE for example if Mary Barra was paid $10 million including merit bonuses , is that really underpaid ?
  • ToolGuy "At risk of oversimplification, a heat pump takes ambient air, compresses it, and then uses the condenser’s heat to warm up the air it just grabbed from outside."• This description seems fairly dramatically wrong to me.
  • SCE to AUX The UAW may win the battle, but it will lose the war.The mfrs will never agree to job protections, and production outsourcing will match any pay increases won by the union.With most US market cars not produced by Detroit, how many people really care about this strike?