2017 Volkswagen Jetta GLI Review - Potent, Painted, Pricey

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain
Fast Facts

2017 Volkswagen Jetta GLI

2.0-liter turbocharged inline-four, DOHC (210 horsepower @ 5,300 rpm; 207 lb-ft @ 1,700 rpm)
Six-speed dual-clutch automatic, front-wheel drive
24 city / 33 highway / 27 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
9.8 city / 7.4 highway / 8.7 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
34.1 mpg [6.9 L/100 km] (Observed)
Base Price
$28,715 (U.S) / $36,740 (Canada)
As Tested
$29,815 (U.S.) / $38,140 (Canada)
Prices include $820 destination charge in the United States and $1,745 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

I was lost. Rather, I was about to be lost.

As I drove an eye-catching white silver metallic 2017 Volkswagen Jetta GLI onto the MV Confederation in Caribou, Nova Scotia, it dawned on me. I had never driven across Prince Edward Island by myself. But I was about to, if I could find my way.

Mrs. Cain and the kids had already made it to Prince Edward Island, having departed earlier in the week to begin our house hunt after our Nova Scotian home sold in 24 hours. Sunshine and a quick car made me realize that the MV Confederation’s perfectly timed departure would allow for some sorely needed blood pressure reduction, sitting on the deck of a ferry for an hour in the middle of a Friday afternoon.

But I left my iPhone charge cord at home on the dining room table. My phone’s battery was below 5 percent with pictures yet to be snapped. I couldn’t use my phone for directions. I didn’t trust the island signage to be sufficient — we’re not big on signs around these parts. And then a light came on: the ferry’s tourist bureau would have maps. Maps! Maps, my dear Watson. Maps. I studied that arcane sheet for, well, it had to be minutes. In the belly of the ship, with everybody else back in their cars, I spent a few more minutes folding that sucker up with every ounce of dexterity my parents’ genetics afforded me.

Not until I arrived at my Summerside destination did it dawn on me. The 2017 Volkswagen Jetta GLI has a navigation system.

Maybe that’s why it costs $29,815.

Gulp.

The 2017 Hyundai Elantra Sport we reviewed a few weeks ago can be navi and DSG-equipped, like this Jetta GLI, at $25,150, nearly $5,000 less. The Elantra is also, dare I say it, more fun.

Thankfully, the Jetta GLI certainly doesn’t want for power. Although distinctly less torquey than the 2.0T-powered Volkswagen Golf GTI – the GTI produces the same 210 ponies but 51 additional lb-ft at 200 revs sooner — the Jetta’s 2.0-liter turbocharged inline-four is nicely suited to the dual-clutch automatic, particularly in sport mode; less so at low revs.

After I got off the boat and realized supper at my mother-in-law’s was quite likely in the offing, the Jetta GLI made exceptionally quick work of slow-moving traffic on the Trans-Canada Highway. (Yes, I should have taken a shortcut across Route 23, but that map was a distant memory by the time it was folded up. And I found myself entranced by the dulcet tones of Karen Mair on CBC’s Mainstreet, unconscious of the NAV button to the right of the touchscreen.)

The Elantra Sport, by comparison, is powerful enough, but its 1.6T never feels especially energetic, like it’s champing at the bit and egging you on.

Unfortunately, compared with the supple Elantra Sport, this particular Jetta GLI specimen traversed rough island roads quite roughly indeed. I’ve been in Jetta GLIs before — they’re not supposed to ride like this. But on winter run-flats, even smooth surfaces begin to feel like cobblestone streets.

This negated much of the fun one could have on twisty, rural two-lanes. Turn-in isn’t what you’d expect, mid-corner bumps turn into annoying disruptions, and the Jetta GLI’s chassis is exposed for what it is: not a GTI.

Fine. Entirely acceptable with the right tires. A pleasant daily driver.

But not a GTI.

And not an Elantra Sport.

That’s not to say that in 2017, in the months before an all-new Jetta’s reveal, the Volkswagen Jetta GLI doesn’t have a number of redeeming qualities. Forget those early criticisms of the Mk6 Jetta. Cheap and decontented? Material quality now, especially in this top-spec car, is leagues beyond what it was seven years ago. That torsion-beam rear suspension of early Mk6 Jettas is long gone, as well. This is a mature performance sedan, if not an outright athlete like its hatchback sibling.

It’s also huge inside. There’s midsize-aping space in the back of the Jetta, a car that stretches only 182.2 inches from bumper to bumper, 10-inches shorter than a Passat. The official trunk capacity specs of 15.7 cubic feet are belied by a shape that permits the loading of a vacation’s worth of stuff. Observed fuel economy of 34 miles per gallon is outstanding. Aside from the roaring tires and some pleasant 2.0T burbles, it’s a quiet and generally refined car. It’s a Mk6 Jetta with enough subdued style to turn heads but without the boy-racer cues that shout for attention. [Maybe Mazda should take note. –Ed.]

Nevertheless, price matters. Admittedly, Volkswagen is in a discounting kind of mood, but other automakers aren’t opposed to incentivizing their products, either, especially in 2017’s challenging sedan arena. With 2017 Jetta GLI pricing starting at $28,715, to which you’ll add $1,100 for two-pedal operation, the Elantra Sport and Golf GTI aren’t the only cars standing in the Jetta GLI’s way. Besides, it’ll take a bit of a leap for many sports sedan enthusiasts to consider a Hyundai, however unfair. And the $26,415-37,110 GTI’s hatchback and tighter rear quarters are definitive no-nos for many sedan buyers.

But the Subaru WRX has a lower base price and substantially more athleticism. The upcoming Honda Civic Si stickers for only $24,775.

Those are inexpensive and enticing opponents for a Mk6 Jetta that debuted in late 2010, otherwise known as the year you last looked at a map.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net and a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 68 comments
  • Jfbar167 Jfbar167 on May 24, 2017

    Had a 2013 GLI for couple years. Overall very nice and ZERO issues. As for the "fake leather", I actually preferred it to the real deal. It did NOT wrinkle and crack as the (all other prior cars with) real stuff. Tim mentioned the "growl" but failed to realize it was actually a "fart can"(soundaktor) mounted on the firewall. Disconnected that, and it sounded more refined and true. My takeaway from it rather than referring to it as a 30K Jetta, I thought of it as a 40K CC in a more "toss able" and practical body style.

    • Krhodes1 Krhodes1 on May 24, 2017

      Very much second killing the stupid noise grunter. Did that electronically with my GTI and makes for a much more pleasant car. There is a BIG difference between how the MBQ GTI drives and how this car drives, IMHO. Not that the GLI is in any way bad, just the MBQ Golf is that much better. I don't like how the current A4 drives, so I expect I will like the MBQ version better. But I have zero use for AWD regardless of type in a car.

  • Br2_wdc Br2_wdc on Jan 06, 2018

    In the Washington DC metro area, they are clearing out 2017 GLI's both manual and DSG for low 20's. Simply the bargain of the century. I picked up a 6-speed manual, and couldn't be more thrilled with the car, especially with the announcement of no manual transmission option for 2018 VW GLI's. I did drive a base 2017 VW GTI S, and it's certainly a nice car, with a more sport tuned suspension, more torque, and a more updated MQB platform. But 25k for a base GTI vs. low 20's for a fully loaded GLI? Not a fair fight: GLI wins going away.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next